Review | 2018 Lexus LC500 | Finally Something Original (savagegeese)
#3
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (9)
Enjoyed this, but take exception to a couple of the things:
First the wheels - 20" vs 21" - Ride comfort - wheel diameter is not the only determinate in the equation. Size and aspect ratio of the tires play a large role in the equation and both determine the OD of the tire/wheel combo. Both the RCF and GSF ride on 19" wheels, and their overall OD is 26" front and 26.6" rear. therefore the tires have a sidewall height of 3.5" front and 3.8" rear. On the LC (21" wheels) the OD is 25.7' and 28.5" front to rear - Sidewall height is 3.9" front and 3.8" rear. Higher in front and same in the rear compared to the two F cars. The 20" LC wheels are 28.7" front and rear - therefore sidewall height is 4.4". So yes about .5" more for the 20s. But that is on an RFT which we all know rides harsher and doesn't handle as well as a non RFT tire. As a point of reference my 255/40/21 and 295/35/21 are 29" - so sidewall height is 4" front and rear.
Second - The reviewer said that the LC was unique, not another this and not another that. I disagree - when I first saw the LC, Aston Martin immediately popped into my head. I'll bet Lexus bought and tore down a couple of AMs
Otherwise - Yes a pretty good take IMO
Lou
First the wheels - 20" vs 21" - Ride comfort - wheel diameter is not the only determinate in the equation. Size and aspect ratio of the tires play a large role in the equation and both determine the OD of the tire/wheel combo. Both the RCF and GSF ride on 19" wheels, and their overall OD is 26" front and 26.6" rear. therefore the tires have a sidewall height of 3.5" front and 3.8" rear. On the LC (21" wheels) the OD is 25.7' and 28.5" front to rear - Sidewall height is 3.9" front and 3.8" rear. Higher in front and same in the rear compared to the two F cars. The 20" LC wheels are 28.7" front and rear - therefore sidewall height is 4.4". So yes about .5" more for the 20s. But that is on an RFT which we all know rides harsher and doesn't handle as well as a non RFT tire. As a point of reference my 255/40/21 and 295/35/21 are 29" - so sidewall height is 4" front and rear.
Second - The reviewer said that the LC was unique, not another this and not another that. I disagree - when I first saw the LC, Aston Martin immediately popped into my head. I'll bet Lexus bought and tore down a couple of AMs
Otherwise - Yes a pretty good take IMO
Lou
#4
Driver School Candidate
The following 2 users liked this post by flowrider:
JONPRON (06-05-20),
pottypants (06-04-20)
#6
Looks like Aston copied Lexus. The LC concept came out in 2012.
Steve
Steve
The following users liked this post:
DRGibbons (06-04-20)
#7
Pole Position
I owned both a Vantage S and now the LC. In the flesh the those two have a different stance, the AM being much lower and shorter. Aston design also has flowing curves from every angle, while the LC has razor sharp lines viewed from the sides and front. That being said, they are still part of the same basic design DNA.
The following users liked this post:
DRGibbons (06-05-20)
Trending Topics
#9
Pole Position
^^^^The Vantage is the wrong model for comparison. The DB11 is the comparable model:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CefQUhmbqIM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OWBXEsy8_U
Lou
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CefQUhmbqIM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OWBXEsy8_U
Lou
#10
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
i think you mean 28.7 front (a typo i assume).
Wow, you got plus size tires, huh? Was that for looks or ride quality? Is there a pic of your car with those tires on someplace? Runflats or not?
As a point of reference my 255/40/21 and 295/35/21 are 29" - so sidewall height is 4" front and rear.
#14
I'll say this, I like savagegeese a lot more than Doug DeMuro...
#15
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post