IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

IS F at altitude

Old 01-06-18, 12:15 PM
  #1  
mxer
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
mxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: CO
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default IS F at altitude

Hey all, looking into getting into an IS F but I have concerns about the N/A engine at Denver altitude or greater (10,000 ft). I was hoping to get some owners who drive them at altitude to give me their opinions. I'm concerned about it feeling sluggish especially going up to the mountains.

I had a friend who sold his E92 M3 because he felt like it was too slow at our altitude. I also heard of people complaining about their RS4 (maybe altitude and carbon buildup) I currently have a mildly modified STi which is a little less susceptible to altitude due to the turbo and I don't want to downgrade in performance.
IS Fs are pretty rare so a test drive is also rare plus it's difficult to gauge on a 20 min drive.

Thanks
Old 01-06-18, 12:24 PM
  #2  
liquidtek
Advanced
 
liquidtek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: CO
Posts: 635
Received 96 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

The NA engine does struggle a bit at altitude vs boost but with full bolt ons it still puts the smack down on majority of the evos/sti/bwm/mustangs around town.
Old 01-06-18, 12:48 PM
  #3  
mxer
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
mxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: CO
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was looking to keep it stock.
Is it pretty disappointing then?
Old 01-06-18, 04:16 PM
  #4  
MileHIFcar
Pole Position
 
MileHIFcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,672
Received 402 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

Yes, if your going to keep it stock it will struggle and wheeze a little like an asthmatic going up to the mountains. It's such a different beast when it's FBO and it compensates some for altitude but still loses about 82 hp @ the crank compared to sea level.

It's not as bad in town @ 5,280 +/- but when you head up into the mountains it will start to lose power especially if you want to keep it stock.

I'd say forced induction or a Tesla for altitude especially for a lot of mountain driving....... my 2 cents
Old 01-06-18, 04:37 PM
  #5  
mxer
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
mxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: CO
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess I’ll have to just go drive one. There’s only one that I know of for sale. Is yours stock? If so are you disappointed? I’m guessing just intake and headers are the main mods.
Old 01-06-18, 07:28 PM
  #6  
mxer
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
mxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: CO
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks professor. I'm aware that the the partial pressure of oxygen is lower therefore less power can be made through combustion.

My point was how it feels. You could have a 600 hp car at sea level and have it make 500 hp here and it's still freaking fast.
Old 01-06-18, 07:30 PM
  #7  
MileHIFcar
Pole Position
 
MileHIFcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,672
Received 402 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

OP ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^I sent you a PM if you had any further questions other than what has been said on this thread feel free to contact me
Old 01-06-18, 10:30 PM
  #8  
ultimase
Intermediate
 
ultimase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Ok
Posts: 384
Received 70 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

how it feels is going to be completely subjective, so yes, you should try to drive one.
Old 01-10-18, 09:37 AM
  #9  
Savixor
Driver School Candidate
 
Savixor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine isn't sluggish around town. It's a V8 this is one of the best for NA setup around here, that's why I went this route. Then again, I have'nt driven mine up the mountain yet. I just got it. I drove a 4x4 four cylinders up the mountain before this so I'm sure I won't be disappointed with this.

Last edited by Savixor; 01-10-18 at 09:41 AM.
Old 01-10-18, 11:22 AM
  #10  
jdmSW20
Racer
iTrader: (12)
 
jdmSW20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vegas
Posts: 1,632
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

I'm in vegas which isn't as high as Denver, but, we are a lot higher than Cali. But the car still feels good, it just feels better at lower altitude.

I don't know if someone higher than us can chime in and help, but its a V8 so its not going to get "slow"
Old 01-10-18, 02:22 PM
  #11  
Leander311
Intermediate
iTrader: (2)
 
Leander311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 359
Received 47 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mxer
Thanks professor. I'm aware that the the partial pressure of oxygen is lower therefore less power can be made through combustion.

My point was how it feels. You could have a 416 hp car at sea level and have it make 290 hp here and it's still decently fast.
Fixed. That's exactly how it's gonna feel, after plugging in your 10k ASL reference to an air density calculator. If you want elevation performance, stick to FI.

Btw, '14 CTS V-Sports are becoming quite affordable - there was even a Jalopnik blurb to that effect recently. With tune they'll make ~430whp and won't be nearly as impacted by the thinner air. It's no Lexus, but not a terrible option since RWD seems to be an acceptable platform to you.
Old 01-11-18, 07:17 AM
  #12  
LexusfanVA
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
LexusfanVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: MD
Posts: 754
Received 260 Likes on 158 Posts
Default

To make it easier, just go test drive another V8 with similar power, 10-15 Camaro SS/11-17 Mustang GT. They are fairly similar in weight and power and you'll be able to tell if it's weezy or not at that altititue. I'd venture to say if a 420hp ISF is brought down to IS350 levels at 300HP or so, that's still plenty quick and you'll have the V8 sound and great 8 speed to boot. ATS-V or S4 or 340i or something similar would be my choice if you want to stick to FI.
Old 01-12-18, 03:50 AM
  #13  
IronNam
Pit Crew
 
IronNam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: KS
Posts: 227
Received 83 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

My bone stock ISF did not like elevation at 6000ft in New Mexico and Arizona during my roadtrip to and from California/ Kansas. I'm really used to the power at Sacramento and Wichita, elevation is pretty low compared to the mountains.

I guess the full bolt on guys have said differently, which I wish I got to experience. Go for the RR Racing Supercharger!
Old 01-12-18, 07:05 PM
  #14  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,190
Received 3,836 Likes on 2,325 Posts
Default

Sacramento Raceway was 16 feet ASL. Hard to get too much lower without getting wet or going to the Mojave.
Old 01-13-18, 05:47 AM
  #15  
IronNam
Pit Crew
 
IronNam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: KS
Posts: 227
Received 83 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
Sacramento Raceway was 16 feet ASL. Hard to get too much lower without getting wet or going to the Mojave.
In a matter of a day, I was able to experience full power bone stock ISF... and asthmatic ISF when driving in 6000ft...

Pulling onto a 40mph road was scary LOL

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: IS F at altitude



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:02 PM.