IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

Disappointing dyno day FBO tune ISF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-17, 09:34 AM
  #1  
512ISF
Rookie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
512ISF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Disappointing dyno day FBO tune ISF

I finally got around to dynoing today.

6th gear,sport mode, rr tuned intake box open with fan directed at it.

mods:
ppe headers
rr tune and intake
full 3inch custom exhaust catless with x pipe
joe z elbow

results:
385hp/368tq


Any ideas what could be holding back the car from the 400+ that everyone else is hitting?
Old 10-14-17, 09:44 AM
  #2  
moleb
Driver School Candidate
 
moleb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Tx
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

should have dyno before bolt ons, then after imho. Thats what I'm doing. I'm also taking it to the track after every mod i do.

so far stock i dynod 348whp, and ran 12.7 1/4 at 112mph. just installed borla exhaust so now I will be going back to track and dyno it see the gains.

i think you should go to the 1/4 to be honest. If you trap over 115mph and run below 12.5 then your mods were useful imho.
Old 10-14-17, 09:58 AM
  #3  
MileHIFcar
Pole Position
 
MileHIFcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,672
Received 402 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

I wouldn't be too worried about the numbers honestly. I've found out that the ISF is SUPER finicky on the dyno if it doesn't see the right conditions. Example I dynoed my car when it was stock and it put down 357 whp and then after when I put on the Borla exhaust and I think I lost 5 hp lol..........

After that and researching here on CL I've come to the realization that this car doesn't like dynos like some other dyno queens and it doesn't mean that your not making north of 400+ whp because you are!

There is no way to simulate road speed at 60 mph+ with some of these fans that these shops use, and I think that's one of the problems with the ISF and it's computers that pull timing if they don't see something equivalent with IAT at higher speeds.

Trust me I was disappointed too but I soon got over it and have never went back to the dyno and I'm FBO and honestly don't care to see what I'm putting down. I know that my car is pretty fast for what it is in it's current state of tune based on the wins I've had down in Mexico every weekend. I've raced over 75+ cars at least over the past year since being FBO and although I don't win every race the ones I do win validate that the car is putting out what it's supposed to when RR engineered the tune for the associating mods

Just my 2c
The following users liked this post:
breed (01-25-20)
Old 10-14-17, 10:01 AM
  #4  
512ISF
Rookie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
512ISF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by moleb
should have dyno before bolt ons, then after imho. Thats what I'm doing. I'm also taking it to the track after every mod i do.

so far stock i dynod 348whp, and ran 12.7 1/4 at 112mph. just installed borla exhaust so now I will be going back to track and dyno it see the gains.

i think you should go to the 1/4 to be honest. If you trap over 115mph and run below 12.5 then your mods were useful imho.
I did dyno stock as well 345/308. And ran around a 13.0 1/4.

With current mods my best is 12.5x with 114/116.
Old 10-14-17, 10:04 AM
  #5  
512ISF
Rookie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
512ISF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MileHIFcar
I wouldn't be too worried about the numbers honestly. I've found out that the ISF is SUPER finicky on the dyno if it doesn't see the right conditions. Example I dynoed my car when it was stock and it put down 357 whp and then after when I put on the Borla exhaust and I think I lost 5 hp lol..........

After that and researching here on CL I've come to the realization that this car doesn't like dynos like some other dyno queens and it doesn't mean that your not making north of 400+ whp because you are!

There is no way to simulate road speed at 60 mph+ with some of these fans that these shops use, and I think that's one of the problems with the ISF and it's computers that pull timing if they don't see something equivalent with IAT at higher speeds.

Trust me I was disappointed too but I soon got over it and have never went back to the dyno and I'm FBO and honestly don't care to see what I'm putting down. I know that my car is pretty fast for what it is in it's current state of tune based on the wins I've had down in Mexico every weekend. I've raced over 75+ cars at least over the past year since being FBO and although I don't win every race the ones I do win validate that the car is putting out what it's supposed to when RR engineered the tune for the associating mods

Just my 2c
You definitely have a point. The car does well in Mexico as is. I haven't managed to crack below 12.5 at the track but it still is running decent. It'll be interesting to see what my tuner is able to do with the custom tuning.
Old 10-14-17, 07:06 PM
  #6  
jspecvtec
Lead Lap
iTrader: (4)
 
jspecvtec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 777
Received 51 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

can't be disappointed if you don't know what the baseline numbers were and the weather conditions of the dyno days
Old 10-14-17, 07:13 PM
  #7  
mahcah
Racer
iTrader: (3)
 
mahcah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tx
Posts: 1,260
Received 46 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Generally people expect 400+ with those mods so I understand why OP is disappointed. True a baseline should have been done and there are variables that affect dyno results. But with many cases of 400+ on that set up, it is hard not to expect the same or something near it for your own car.
Old 10-14-17, 07:49 PM
  #8  
512ISF
Rookie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
512ISF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Texas
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jspecvtec
can't be disappointed if you don't know what the baseline numbers were and the weather conditions of the dyno days

I did baseline, made 345/308. Tq gains were decent hp not so much. When overlayed it made good gains through mid rpms but the top end peak gains were not as impressive.
Old 10-14-17, 08:21 PM
  #9  
Supraman16
Advanced
iTrader: (5)
 
Supraman16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 586
Received 37 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

One thing I've noticed with my FBO is that it's very sensitive to the quality of the gasoline. What octane were you running? If it's 91 oct, you may want to run a small amount of E85 to bring up the octane a bit. I believe people have had good luck with mixing about 3 gallons of E85 with a full tank of premium gasoline to make the FBO tuned F's run like they are supposed to.
Old 10-15-17, 04:00 PM
  #10  
JDMV8
Instructor
iTrader: (6)
 
JDMV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 1,224
Received 187 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Go dyno at another shop. They can make your graph show 500hp if you want.
My point is that 40hp and 60 ftlb peak gain from pipes and a tune is incredible....LOL
Blame your car for baselining so low
Old 10-15-17, 10:29 PM
  #11  
j3ff
Advanced
 
j3ff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 580
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDMV8
Go dyno at another shop. They can make your graph show 500hp if you want.
My point is that 40hp and 60 ftlb peak gain from pipes and a tune is incredible....LOL
Blame your car for baselining so low
agreed. Those are solid gains that you're putting down. It's always the delta that matters.
Old 10-16-17, 05:57 AM
  #12  
Defratos
Racer
 
Defratos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: On a sand dune
Posts: 1,496
Received 69 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Well last time I did my Dyno with PPE Heades and Joe-Z exhaust I got 370whp, was very disappointed and a few weeks later I had to change my exhaust to OEM one and found I had a decent exhaust leak in the header/exhaust connection area.
Old 10-18-17, 01:31 PM
  #13  
jdmSW20
Racer
iTrader: (12)
 
jdmSW20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vegas
Posts: 1,632
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Yeah a lot of folks get caught up on the numbers but its more about the gain before and after. Like JDMV8 said, those aren't bad gains at all
Old 10-18-17, 03:27 PM
  #14  
Jz39
Advanced
iTrader: (2)
 
Jz39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: MD
Posts: 740
Received 55 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

It's really all about the 1/4 times IMO. No matter what the numbers say, if your car isn't faster at the track, life sucks!
Old 10-20-17, 11:13 AM
  #15  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,203
Received 3,847 Likes on 2,332 Posts
Default

Actually it's all about trap speed. Times are driver dependent and only matter if you are concerned about winning a race. Trap speed tells you everything you need to know about horsepower. Higher speed, more horsepower. Lower speed, less horsepower. You also need to normalize based on density altitude because nothing is more important than the air pressure available to the engine. It is what boost is all about, and even boost is ambient air pressure dependent.

It surely makes sense to check everything and be sure you don't have an intake or exhaust leak hurting your numbers, but dyno numbers are only as good as the tester. From all indications, you did see a pretty impressive gain even if you didn't see the 400+ number you were expecting.

And peak engine torque numbers are meaningless. I have no idea why anyone bothers posting engine torque numbers because engine torque does not move your car, horsepower does.

Last edited by lobuxracer; 10-20-17 at 11:16 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Positron (03-14-23)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stingraygt
LC Model (2018-present)
3
01-25-18 09:13 PM
Vitveet
IS F (2008-2014)
18
01-12-17 09:57 PM
hamooduae
IS F (2008-2014)
12
12-08-15 04:13 PM
Stuno1
IS F (2008-2014)
4
02-21-14 08:33 PM
mercurymet
IS F (2008-2014)
22
04-12-11 11:11 AM



Quick Reply: Disappointing dyno day FBO tune ISF



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:52 AM.