My 08 ISf Vs Challenger 392 Vs 2011 Mustang GT
09-28-18, 01:38 PM
#1
Rookie
Thread Starter
My 08 ISf Vs Challenger 392 Vs 2011 Mustang GT
Hi Everyone, Just wanted to share this Video with you, as i took my ISF to the track, and my best run was 12.39 Sec @ 114.52.
08 ISF(RR Racing Tuned Intake, PPE Headers, Borla CAT-Back, and RR Racing Tuned) On street Tires.
Challenger 392 On Drag Radials (Unknown mods).
2011 Mustang GT (Intake, Headers, Cat Back Exhaust,Tuned) 6 MT, and on Track Tires.
08 ISF(RR Racing Tuned Intake, PPE Headers, Borla CAT-Back, and RR Racing Tuned) On street Tires.
Challenger 392 On Drag Radials (Unknown mods).
2011 Mustang GT (Intake, Headers, Cat Back Exhaust,Tuned) 6 MT, and on Track Tires.
Last edited by GS430FTW; 09-28-18 at 01:43 PM. Reason: Words
09-28-18, 04:52 PM
#2
Pole Position
Good runs thanks for sharing!
The following users liked this post:
GS430FTW (09-29-18)
The following users liked this post:
GS430FTW (09-29-18)
09-29-18, 02:49 AM
#5
Interesting times. Last time I ran with just Joe Z exhaust I ran 12.65 @114 with a lousy 2.2 60ft time. If I could’ve gotten down to 2.0 I probably would’ve been around 12,2 - 12.3. I would’ve expected with that 60ft time you’d be running faster, especially with headers.
09-29-18, 06:46 AM
#6
Different tracks, different days, different weather. It's hard to compare times with so many different track and weather factors to consider. Seems like the fastest NA ISFs are in the northeast where they sometimes get -800 DA weather. Us poor schmucks in SoCal get the 2000+ DA weather all the time at the track and times suffer signifcantly. I've found the only real way to truly compare is heads up racing.
The following users liked this post:
GS430FTW (09-29-18)
09-29-18, 09:17 AM
#7
Rookie
Thread Starter
Different tracks, different days, different weather. It's hard to compare times with so many different track and weather factors to consider. Seems like the fastest NA ISFs are in the northeast where they sometimes get -800 DA weather. Us poor schmucks in SoCal get the 2000+ DA weather all the time at the track and times suffer signifcantly. I've found the only real way to truly compare is heads up racing.
Trending Topics
09-29-18, 06:06 PM
#9
Yeah it’s tough to compare. I too start to question the performance of my car when I hear near stock guys running the same times and/or faster lol.
But then I watched all the supposed “fast” domestics run 13’s and then I don’t feel so bad haha
But then I watched all the supposed “fast” domestics run 13’s and then I don’t feel so bad haha
10-01-18, 07:40 AM
#11
Moderator
DA makes all the difference. Between 2500 and 1800 I see a .3 sec difference. If I can ever race close to 1000ft I’ll def see low 12s. At 0 ft I will prob have an 11 second car. I’ll never see that good of a DA here though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post