ISF Baseline Dyno Results
09-30-08, 09:00 PM
#1
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ISF Baseline Dyno Results Dynojet Added 10-7
Dynopak chassis dyno- bolts to the hub
6 pulls , 2 in each 5th, 4th, 3rd with 20HP difference in each.
peaked at 341 in 3rd, second gear was nearly identical.
Also note I am at 5300 ft roughly.
edited to focus on the DYNO plot
Fig
6 pulls , 2 in each 5th, 4th, 3rd with 20HP difference in each.
peaked at 341 in 3rd, second gear was nearly identical.
Also note I am at 5300 ft roughly.
edited to focus on the DYNO plot
Fig
Last edited by TherealFIG; 10-07-08 at 05:45 PM.
10-01-08, 10:52 AM
#6
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Under an IS F since 2008
Posts: 13,446
Received 1,058 Likes
on
586 Posts
Here in So Cal my R&D IS-F got an approx 333 rwhp base run Pull on a Dyno Jet in 6th gear...
(6th gear is closer to the 1:1 final drive ratio)
5th gear was in the 340's rwhp...
Thanks for sharing
- Joe Z
(6th gear is closer to the 1:1 final drive ratio)
5th gear was in the 340's rwhp...
Thanks for sharing
- Joe Z
10-01-08, 12:14 PM
#7
I'm signed up for a dyno event November 1st at the same shop I always go for testing. I think there is another thread in the IS-F section for people to post their results. You might want to add yours there as well. My work has photobucket links now blocked so I won't get to check out your graphs until later, but 340whp sounds good.
Trending Topics
10-01-08, 12:42 PM
#8
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are the dyno pulls stickies? I will track down that thread.
My pull in 5th was right at 300, so that sounds pretty close to your figures given the altitude difference.
Fig
10-01-08, 03:52 PM
#12
Few comments now that I have had a chance to look at the graphs.
1. The HP and torque lines should cross at 5250 rpm and they aren't.
2. I see SAE correction was used so elevation shouldn't be an issue with results.
3. I like the fact that with those dyno's look so much safer than the dynojet ones spinning 100+mph on rollers held down with a few straps.
3a. Definitely try 6th gear next time.
1. The HP and torque lines should cross at 5250 rpm and they aren't.
2. I see SAE correction was used so elevation shouldn't be an issue with results.
3. I like the fact that with those dyno's look so much safer than the dynojet ones spinning 100+mph on rollers held down with a few straps.
3a. Definitely try 6th gear next time.
10-01-08, 04:03 PM
#13
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Under an IS F since 2008
Posts: 13,446
Received 1,058 Likes
on
586 Posts
Peter
^^ Very Nice... SAE corrected I'm sure...
Every Dyno (various brands) will yield different numbers with different BONE Stock cars...
Including Dynojets...
Whats good, is that I have DYNO tested 3 different Bone Stock IS350's on different days... On the same Dyno Jet, at same location with same tech and each time the cars put down approx. 265 rwhp using 4th gear of course...
- Joe Z
^^ Very Nice... SAE corrected I'm sure...
Every Dyno (various brands) will yield different numbers with different BONE Stock cars...
Including Dynojets...
Whats good, is that I have DYNO tested 3 different Bone Stock IS350's on different days... On the same Dyno Jet, at same location with same tech and each time the cars put down approx. 265 rwhp using 4th gear of course...
- Joe Z
Last edited by Joe Z; 10-01-08 at 04:06 PM.
10-01-08, 04:10 PM
#15
Yes you do, especially if you plan on doing any mods in the future and want a fairly reliable baseline to measure off. 
Maxing out 6th gear on that dyno is pretty safe. I'm getting a little nervous about my dyno session scheduled for Nov 1st on the dynojet.
Maxing out 6th gear on that dyno is pretty safe. I'm getting a little nervous about my dyno session scheduled for Nov 1st on the dynojet.