IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model
View Poll Results: Do you think that IS-F is overpriced compared to M3 Sedan?
Yes
37.21%
No
62.79%
Voters: 86. You may not vote on this poll

Do you think that IS-F is overpriced compared to M3 Sedan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-08, 09:15 PM
  #31  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,033
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlexusAnja
Don't be hating the M3, Toyota (and really, any other manufacturer except perhaps Hyundai) does the same thing with setting a "low" base price and then loading up with options. Look at the IS350, base $36K, loaded $45K, almost $10k more. You have to compare apples to apples and once all is said and done, the M3 will cost more than a comp. equipped IS-F, except M3 will not have an automatic transmission option...

My money, IS-F, because my wife can't drive a stick and I can't afford to have a car in the shop too often...
8 speed IS-F transmission is comparable to the M3 dual clutch, whos price is still unknown. The difference in the pricing is you are nickel and dimed to hell on features that shouldve came standard on a car of this caliber in the first place, leather, paint, 19" wheels etc. Thats already $3200 tacked onto the price for items that should be standard on your halo car. You can walk out with a 56k IS-F and be happy, who wants to walk out with a 54k vinyl interior flat paint 18" M3.

Last edited by 4TehNguyen; 01-15-08 at 09:25 PM.
Old 01-15-08, 09:22 PM
  #32  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
BMW releases official info on M-DCT w/ Drivelogic (BMW's new dual clutch transmission)

Full info/PDF:
http://www.m3post.com/forums/s...07582

DCT acceleration specs:

M3 coupe manual: 4.8s 0-100kmh (1580kg by DIN)
M3 coupe M DCT: 4.6s 0-100kmh (1600kg by DIN)

M3 sedan manual: 4.9s 0-100kmh (1605kg by DIN)
M3 sedan M DCT: 4.7s 0-100kmh (1625kg by DIN)

M3 cabrio manual: 5.3s 0-100kmh (1810kg by DIN)
M3 cabrio M DCT: 5.1s 0-100kmh (1830kg by DIN)

So by BMW standards, it and the IS are neck and neck if not the IS faster. But they can thank R&T for saving their behinds..
....................
Old 01-15-08, 09:42 PM
  #33  
xxlbeerZ
Rookie
 
xxlbeerZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default M3 is cheaper than the IS-F??

Wow, didn't expect the 4-door M3 to undercut the IS-F!

http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=107142
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/01/14/d...es-m3-pricing/

When the IS-F was supposed to be ~$10k less I was interested, now notsomuch.
Old 01-15-08, 11:21 PM
  #34  
newr
Lexus Champion
 
newr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

do we really need another thread for this topic? It has been discussed quite a bit.
Old 01-15-08, 11:36 PM
  #35  
newr
Lexus Champion
 
newr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

BMW figures are always conservative. Real world numbers however are quite different.

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=329624

I think it's very possible to get 4.0s to 60mph with an M3 equiped DCT. This would be amazing because it's not really designed for straight line speed.
Old 01-16-08, 03:21 PM
  #36  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,033
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

look at the options list and see how badly you get nickel and dimed, no leather, no metallic paint, no dual clutch, no 19"
Old 01-16-08, 06:20 PM
  #37  
AlexusAnja
Moderator
 
AlexusAnja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 4,178
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Wow, I'm going to take the M3 then. I don't want to sit on dead cow skin, metallic paint for what? Real draggers pay to get the matte finish. No auto/DCT... excellent. I'll take a base M3 please...
Old 01-16-08, 08:57 PM
  #38  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,033
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AlexusAnja
Wow, I'm going to take the M3 then. I don't want to sit on dead cow skin, metallic paint for what? Real draggers pay to get the matte finish. No auto/DCT... excellent. I'll take a base M3 please...
whats the point in getting a bare bones M3, if you want minimalistic there are far better and higher performing alternatives. You get the M3 to have a combination of luxury and performance, remove the luxury and its just overpriced performance in a look at me BMW
Old 01-17-08, 04:37 AM
  #39  
Tekknikal
Lead Lap
 
Tekknikal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: VI
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not including DCT i think they're very similarly priced. $1k either way is not very significant imo.

having said that i dont think you can throw the lack/cost of DCT at it as a negative. that sounds like hate to me - many would get a stick IS if they could. many would also get a DCT for the IS if they could.
Old 01-17-08, 05:14 AM
  #40  
SikTT
Driver School Candidate
 
SikTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: VA
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am still figuring out if I like the M3 or not.

Don't like the single piston calipers...

Don't like the weight of the car, even though my 335i is in need of a diet.

And when I factor in the options I want, it will probably tip the scales at $70K.

For that type of money I would be looking at other cars. Hell if the Skyline wasn't going to be marked up beyond belief I would definitely buy that car in a heartbeat. Oh well I will just see how well I do with my name being 3rd on the waiting list at my local dealer.

Last edited by SikTT; 01-17-08 at 05:18 AM.
Old 01-17-08, 06:12 AM
  #41  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,033
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tekknikal
not including DCT i think they're very similarly priced. $1k either way is not very significant imo.

having said that i dont think you can throw the lack/cost of DCT at it as a negative. that sounds like hate to me - many would get a stick IS if they could. many would also get a DCT for the IS if they could.
IS-F transmission already has DSG like shift times, throttle blips so its good enough to be considered a DCT alternative, being that its standard makes it better. As much as I liked driving stick, driving stick on a 418 hp 370 torque car is going to be a steep learning curve, a hassle, and after all that work youre still slower. I'd get stick if it was on a IS350 but not a IS-F

A lot of people on the m3 forum cancelled their spot in line to wait until march/april for the DCT M3 builds, there is a good demand for it. If BMWs shifters had the smoothness and shortness of the S2000 shifter (the best feeling manual on the planet) that would be great, but they are still notchy. Just more reasons to get a DCT, plus the mileage is slightly better
Old 01-17-08, 06:32 AM
  #42  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,836
Received 106 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tekknikal
not including DCT i think they're very similarly priced. $1k either way is not very significant imo.

having said that i dont think you can throw the lack/cost of DCT at it as a negative. that sounds like hate to me - many would get a stick IS if they could. many would also get a DCT for the IS if they could.
including all the options, difference will be more than 10k....

Now, you can get 60k M3 without smart entry, sure.

And besides, nothing unfair about calling it out for DCT pricing - in all reviews, 8 speed from Lexus was called awesome. Wanna bet which one will last longer?
Old 01-17-08, 06:36 AM
  #43  
Brian231
Lexus Fanatic
 
Brian231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Candyland
Posts: 6,101
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The M3 will be in the dealer all the time getting sensors replaced. I have known three people with them (2002, 2003 and an 05). All are at the dealer quite a bit. Yes, those straight sixes produce some torque, but I would rather stick with quality that will not bring on irritation. This is basically why I was happy to jump from Infiniti to Lexus. Also, Lexus has more refined styling with not only the L-Finses concept, but with past models as well (LOL).
Old 01-17-08, 07:43 AM
  #44  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Merged b/c we are talking about the same thing in this thread!
Old 01-17-08, 07:44 AM
  #45  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by newr
BMW figures are always conservative. Real world numbers however are quite different.

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=329624

I think it's very possible to get 4.0s to 60mph with an M3 equiped DCT. This would be amazing because it's not really designed for straight line speed.
I agree their figures are either conservative or on the money.


Quick Reply: Do you think that IS-F is overpriced compared to M3 Sedan



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:16 AM.