Notices
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

Why Doesnt Lexus uses Turbo/ SC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #1  
Viet_LeXus's Avatar
Viet_LeXus
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: IL
Lightbulb Why Doesnt Lexus uses Turbo/ SC

I was wondering y doesn't Lexus use turbo/SC? cuz i would luv to buy a Lexus equip with a turbo. if any chance i would want a turbo kit install i wouldnt want to void the warranty on my car.. lol wut u guys think?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 07:03 PM
  #2  
Lextasy89's Avatar
Lextasy89
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

bc they are pu**ies!!!
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #3  
Viet_LeXus's Avatar
Viet_LeXus
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

lol so ur not a fan of those huh? but i seen people modded their lexus with turbo/sc. even with the new models.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 07:11 PM
  #4  
Lextasy89's Avatar
Lextasy89
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Default

no.. i am a fan of them.. i was saying that about lexus.. lol
im guessing they are too worried about not being reliable with the use of those performance parts
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 07:26 PM
  #5  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lexus engines are very efficient and even in non hybrid form, are ULEV II compliant.

Turbos also add complication and looking at lexus cars, from the interiors to wheels, they don't like complication much.

The new engines with DI are too high strung (compression) for a turbo to supply any true advantage.

Will they add some in the future? Who knows! Turbos are getting better and better as technology advances.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 10:11 PM
  #6  
lobuxracer's Avatar
lobuxracer
Tech Resource
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 23,080
Likes: 4,749
From: Georgia
Default

Mike, you're so PC.

You won't see a turbo with anything like big boost on an ISx50 for some time. The compression is too high and the internals are unique to work with direct injection, so low compression pistons to support boost are still a long way off.

You'd be way ahead just to buy the IS-F if you want bigger power.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 10:16 PM
  #7  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
Mike, you're so PC.

You won't see a turbo with anything like big boost on an ISx50 for some time. The compression is too high and the internals are unique to work with direct injection, so low compression pistons to support boost are still a long way off.

You'd be way ahead just to buy the IS-F if you want bigger power.
I have to say, will Lexus have to answer, as they do have taken the Germans on so many fronts. Audi's S4 will go back to a V-6 TT.

Turbos simply attract enthusiasts.

What has happened as of late was the old American method, add bigger engines and displacement. That is what has happened to AMG/M/RS and now "F" with Lexus. "Lets slap a big V-8 (or now V-10) in a smaller car".
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 10:35 PM
  #8  
Viet_LeXus's Avatar
Viet_LeXus
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

0o... so if it doesn't work with turbo than the supercharge might work right? since it only forcing more air into the chamber, and work with the high compression engine right?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 11:41 PM
  #9  
kickin8's Avatar
kickin8
2IS/2RX/4RX
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,851
Likes: 27
From: SF Bay Area
Default

reliability.....?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2007 | 12:35 AM
  #10  
llamaboiz's Avatar
llamaboiz
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11,030
Likes: 7
From: Windward, Oahu
Default

Originally Posted by Viet_LeXus
0o... so if it doesn't work with turbo than the supercharge might work right? since it only forcing more air into the chamber, and work with the high compression engine right?
No, supercharging AND turbocharging are the same, forced induction. They force more air into the chamber so having high compression pistons (like ours) is a no no.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 07:40 AM
  #11  
Kurtz's Avatar
Kurtz
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,810
Likes: 14
From: NC
Default

Note that there -is- a supercharger kit for the IS350, it only adds about 40 at the wheels though.

Why lexus does use forced induction I think is simply that it doesn't need to. Its engines are smooth, deliver good power for their displacement, and offer good fuel economy and low emissions.

Why complicate things and risk more warranty work when they don't need to?
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 12:01 PM
  #12  
moses0324's Avatar
moses0324
Pit Crew
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

^^^i agree reliability would go way down...turbos always = problems

boost leaks ect...they are a pain in the ***
fyi i had an audi a4...turbo was always confused on when to boost
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 12:26 PM
  #13  
CRB's Avatar
CRB
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

I can think of about four or five reasons: Noise, reliability, power delivery characteristics, already have a V-8 model with 400 + HP in the pipeline and maybe just maybe blown engines aren't in the corporate image of how Toyota envisions Lexus.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 12:56 PM
  #14  
DiauR1's Avatar
DiauR1
Lead Lap
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

I rather have a NA/ 400hp+ than a FI 400hp+ anyday period.

The unforgetable nightmare when my S4 turbo blew on the highway was just insane. The turbo reliability was the deciding factor which pulled me away from the BMW 335 coupe. I didnt want to go though the headache again knowing if I did purchase the 335, no doubt in my mind would I have added a chip and tear up that engine. Now I wouldnt mind if I had a FI weekend car hehe
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 01:15 PM
  #15  
i3urton's Avatar
i3urton
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
From: ca
Default

Originally Posted by DiauR1
I rather have a NA/ 400hp+ than a FI 400hp+ anyday period.

The unforgetable nightmare when my S4 turbo blew on the highway was just insane. The turbo reliability was the deciding factor which pulled me away from the BMW 335 coupe. I didnt want to go though the headache again knowing if I did purchase the 335, no doubt in my mind would I have added a chip and tear up that engine. Now I wouldnt mind if I had a FI weekend car hehe
get the new 1 series...i only noticed heating issues with the 335i...
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:30 AM.