Vivid Racing Review!!
My brain hurts.
So let me try to get these HP numbers straight. Using the WCF "corrected" numbers, I'm seeing the following:
12/13/2014
Dyno Numbers (Before Vivid Tune)
247.9 hp
250.7 hp
253.0 hp
250.5 hp Average
1/5/2015
Dyno Numbers (After Vivid Tune)
239.6 hp
245.3 hp
251.5 hp
245.5 hp Average
So based solely on the WCF numbers, it looks like you are making slightly less power now? Yes I know this may be within the range of tolerable error, but regardless, those are the numbers.
One of the things I don't understand is why don't the numbers on the dyno sheet you just posted of the 12/13 runs don't match up the the numbers on the graphs you posted back on page 1? Shouldn't they be the same?
So let me try to get these HP numbers straight. Using the WCF "corrected" numbers, I'm seeing the following:12/13/2014
Dyno Numbers (Before Vivid Tune)
247.9 hp
250.7 hp
253.0 hp
250.5 hp Average
1/5/2015
Dyno Numbers (After Vivid Tune)
239.6 hp
245.3 hp
251.5 hp
245.5 hp Average
So based solely on the WCF numbers, it looks like you are making slightly less power now? Yes I know this may be within the range of tolerable error, but regardless, those are the numbers.
One of the things I don't understand is why don't the numbers on the dyno sheet you just posted of the 12/13 runs don't match up the the numbers on the graphs you posted back on page 1? Shouldn't they be the same?
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,103
Likes: 368
From: Beantown
My brain hurts.
So let me try to get these HP numbers straight. Using the WCF "corrected" numbers, I'm seeing the following:
12/13/2014
Dyno Numbers (Before Vivid Tune)
247.9 hp
250.7 hp
253.0 hp
250.5 hp Average
1/5/2015
Dyno Numbers (After Vivid Tune)
239.6 hp
245.3 hp
251.5 hp
245.5 hp Average
So based solely on the WCF numbers, it looks like you are making slightly less power now? Yes I know this may be within the range of tolerable error, but regardless, those are the numbers.
One of the things I don't understand is why don't the numbers on the dyno sheet you just posted of the 12/13 runs don't match up the the numbers on the graphs you posted back on page 1? Shouldn't they be the same?
So let me try to get these HP numbers straight. Using the WCF "corrected" numbers, I'm seeing the following:12/13/2014
Dyno Numbers (Before Vivid Tune)
247.9 hp
250.7 hp
253.0 hp
250.5 hp Average
1/5/2015
Dyno Numbers (After Vivid Tune)
239.6 hp
245.3 hp
251.5 hp
245.5 hp Average
So based solely on the WCF numbers, it looks like you are making slightly less power now? Yes I know this may be within the range of tolerable error, but regardless, those are the numbers.
One of the things I don't understand is why don't the numbers on the dyno sheet you just posted of the 12/13 runs don't match up the the numbers on the graphs you posted back on page 1? Shouldn't they be the same?
Right but based on the guy from the dyno place said the temp was around 12F that day thats why I said I may need to check this again in spring time to verify the numbers. The car wasn't full warmed up he said he could keep testing as he thought once everything warmed up the numbers would change. Also yes my brain hurts as well as I really don't believe it works I think it really changes shifting and other little things that don't gain your hp but make it feel faster.
Yeah temp can have a huge impact on HP. Thanks for taking a chance with this. I'm looking forward to seeing the numbers in the spring!
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,103
Likes: 368
From: Beantown
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,103
Likes: 368
From: Beantown
Also forgot I had 2100 miles when I did the first dyno and after I had 2800 so I did'nt get that many miles as I wanted as I didn't drive down to New Jersey like a planned. So hopefully for spring will have more miles on.
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,103
Likes: 368
From: Beantown
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lil4cyl
Performance
58
Nov 18, 2012 08:06 AM











