GS - 4th Gen (2013-2020) Discussion about the 2013 and up GS models

2016 GS 200t vs. 350 - Opinions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-18, 01:03 PM
  #16  
JeffKeryk
Racer
Thread Starter
 
JeffKeryk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 1,850
Received 442 Likes on 310 Posts
Default

I appreciate all the guidance. Kinda surprised so many are concerned about my finances... We just bought a new 2018 RX 450h and I kinda have the bug for another Lexus. I am lucky enough to buy whatever I want, practically anyway. But the more I spend on this car, which I do not need, takes away from my important altruistic work. The main reason for my original post is, there are 3 2016 GS 200t in the Silicon Valley dealerships for $29K to $31K. I like the newer, refreshened car. But $28K buys a really nice 2015 GS350 F Sport. So I am looking for your experience and guidance. Again, thanks to all.
Old 06-09-18, 01:12 PM
  #17  
ChronoR
Pole Position
 
ChronoR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: BC
Posts: 282
Received 76 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

If you like the look of the 2016 then go for it! It's your car to enjoy.

Dynamics-wise, the 350 is better though.
The following users liked this post:
JeffKeryk (06-09-18)
Old 06-09-18, 08:32 PM
  #18  
JeffKeryk
Racer
Thread Starter
 
JeffKeryk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 1,850
Received 442 Likes on 310 Posts
Default

Well, I have the answer that works for me. AJLex19 hit it on the head.
Went to Putnam Lexus in Redwood City where we bought the RX 450h in February.
We drove a 2016 GS 200t with 20K miles; perfect condition, sufficient power.
Nice car. Price was about $28K or something like that.

Then we drove a loaded 2013 GS 350 F Sport with 58K miles. Gorgeous silver with the reddish interior, which ain't really for me, but whatever.
Good Lord what a difference.
Lexus made a mistake trying to sell an entry level GS.
They were asking $24K for the older car which just came in on trade.
I offered $22K, we settled on $23K with Lexus Certification.
Bumper to bumper 2 year warranty unlimited mileage including services.
Mainly, good insurance for the electronics...
The will do the 60K service before I pick up the car.
All in, with CA tax and registration thru Aug 2019, it was just shy of $26K out the door.
The let me put $5K on my Costco card to get the 3% back...
Wrote a check for the rest and out the door we went.

AJLex19's good advice was to drive both cars...
The corollary is, if you want a 200t, don't drive a 350 F Sport.

All good and thanks for the excellent input.

Last edited by JeffKeryk; 06-09-18 at 08:41 PM.
The following 5 users liked this post by JeffKeryk:
AJLex19 (06-09-18), ChronoR (06-09-18), drgrant (07-23-19), Dunndarryn (06-11-18), NickMayer (07-29-19)
Old 06-09-18, 08:51 PM
  #19  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 227 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Congrats! You made the right decision. The 2L is far inferior to the 3.5L. Now go drive some canyons
Old 06-09-18, 11:41 PM
  #20  
AJLex19
Lead Lap
 
AJLex19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NY
Posts: 3,613
Received 1,130 Likes on 838 Posts
Default

Congrats on the new ride - I wonder if you would've bought the 438hp GS F if they had one to test drive lol j/k...glad I could help but sometimes a test drive can simply make all the difference.
Old 06-10-18, 10:11 AM
  #21  
rj4510
Instructor
 
rj4510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 813
Received 74 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Great choice and congrats!
Old 06-10-18, 10:45 AM
  #22  
JeffKeryk
Racer
Thread Starter
 
JeffKeryk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 1,850
Received 442 Likes on 310 Posts
Default

In retrospect, the 200t is somewhat of a strippie while the 350 F Sport is more top-of-the-line.
More than the engine, the ride and pretty-much everything made the F a different car even though it was older with nearly 3 times the mileage.
Kinda like taking a knife to a gun fight.
Or maybe like driving a '66 Tempest then a '66 GTO...
All good, and again, thanks for the valuable input.
Old 07-22-19, 12:50 PM
  #23  
nallis
Driver School Candidate
 
nallis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 28
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JeffKeryk
Well, I have the answer that works for me. AJLex19 hit it on the head.
Went to Putnam Lexus in Redwood City where we bought the RX 450h in February.
We drove a 2016 GS 200t with 20K miles; perfect condition, sufficient power.
Nice car. Price was about $28K or something like that.

Then we drove a loaded 2013 GS 350 F Sport with 58K miles. Gorgeous silver with the reddish interior, which ain't really for me, but whatever.
Good Lord what a difference.
Lexus made a mistake trying to sell an entry level GS.
They were asking $24K for the older car which just came in on trade.
I offered $22K, we settled on $23K with Lexus Certification.
Bumper to bumper 2 year warranty unlimited mileage including services.
Mainly, good insurance for the electronics...
The will do the 60K service before I pick up the car.
All in, with CA tax and registration thru Aug 2019, it was just shy of $26K out the door.
The let me put $5K on my Costco card to get the 3% back...
Wrote a check for the rest and out the door we went.

AJLex19's good advice was to drive both cars...
The corollary is, if you want a 200t, don't drive a 350 F Sport.

All good and thanks for the excellent input.
I know that you already made the decision and this is sort of old but you were definitely impressed by the 2013 GS 350 SIX SPEED TRANSMISSION. If I am not mistaken, I believe that you have the 6 speed. That transmission is way, way better at giving you that seat of the pants feel in performance. Heck! It may even be quicker in that car than in the same generation 8 speed version. It sure feels a lot quicker to me. I previously had the 2007 GS 350 and I can tell you that it walks the new 8 speed transmissions in the IS and the new GS. I now own a IS 350 F sport. Before I sold the GS, something felt off in the new IS and my brother and I would drag the cars and do pulls. Guess what?! The old GS 350 was quicker. And don't get fooled by paper numbers either. My older GS with the 6 speed transmission you have in the real world is better on gas than the new 8 speed. This 8 speed at highway speeds, when you stomp on it, would drift behind the older 6 speed transmissions in RWD format from 2007 - 2013. Either way, great choice! You won!
Old 07-22-19, 04:08 PM
  #24  
bob256k
Instructor
 
bob256k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: California
Posts: 1,053
Received 266 Likes on 204 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChronoR
That sounds odd to me because in Sports(+) mode, the V6 shouldn't feel like it's lacking in in low-end torque or response.

Of course, for the maximal instant torquiness, the GS450h will deliver there.

You just have to drive the GS350 differently than the 200t. I drove a IS200t and it was ok, not as responsive as the 350 when pushed, but it worked and moved. I would be more concerned with carbon and turbo oil issues, but i have never owned a gs200t long term, so maybe there is no issue with the turbo engine. I would check out the is200t forums; its the same engine, so if there are any issues they would know.
Old 07-22-19, 07:58 PM
  #25  
GS350Boi
Pit Crew
 
GS350Boi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: MI
Posts: 113
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

There is no replacement for displacement. IMHO, the LAST THING a GS needs is “Less Power”. And why are we comparing a Civic Type-R to a GS? That comparison is apples to oranges. Here is another irrelevant fact. My neighbors Motorhome with a 450HP Chevy 454 is also slower than a Lexus GS. Gets worse gas mileage too.
Old 07-27-19, 05:04 AM
  #26  
Cwang
Instructor
 
Cwang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,207
Received 310 Likes on 211 Posts
Default

As others have said, good decision! The GS200T is as gutless as the current GS250, I'm not sure why they sell either of them here. 350 or F
Old 07-29-19, 08:15 AM
  #27  
NickMayer
Advanced
 
NickMayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: KY
Posts: 696
Received 161 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GS350Boi
There is no replacement for displacement. IMHO, the LAST THING a GS needs is “Less Power”. And why are we comparing a Civic Type-R to a GS? That comparison is apples to oranges. Here is another irrelevant fact. My neighbors Motorhome with a 450HP Chevy 454 is also slower than a Lexus GS. Gets worse gas mileage too.
But what is the 0-60 in the motorhome?
Old 07-29-19, 08:21 AM
  #28  
ItzFilyO
Lexus Test Driver
 
ItzFilyO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: California
Posts: 5,813
Received 1,046 Likes on 661 Posts
Default

Nick u should drag race that motorhome with ur GS.
Old 07-29-19, 08:50 AM
  #29  
NickMayer
Advanced
 
NickMayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: KY
Posts: 696
Received 161 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ItzFilyO
Nick u should drag race that motorhome with ur GS.
I like how you think!

I'll leave it in ECO mode just to keep it sporting.
Old 07-29-19, 08:53 AM
  #30  
bigblack06
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
bigblack06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Beantown
Posts: 7,029
Received 321 Likes on 219 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JeffKeryk
Hi All - I am considering a 2016 200t that is approx. $31K with about 25K miles.
Please offer your thoughts vs. the 350 Model.

Thanks in advance!
What I've heard from most people is that the GS 200t is really good for mostly city driving as the gas milege is great but the car is really slow, its a 4 cyclinder turbo GS that weighs almost 4,000 lbs I would pass and just get the 350.


Quick Reply: 2016 GS 200t vs. 350 - Opinions



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 PM.