![]() |
I'll ask another way 300 vs 350
If you were looking at 2 identically optioned cars with 60,000 miles
the first a 2006 gs300 for X price how much more would you be willing to spend for a 2007 gs350 with the same miles and options |
Different people are going to base that on different factors, so it really only matters how much more you would be willing to spend.
Edit- Let me be less of a *#*# about it...perhaps a hypothetical (or real) pricing scenario would yield some discussion that might be helpful to you in making or backing-up your decision. Give the prices - $2X,000 vs $2X,000 - and ask which would forum members pick/why? I really think that your initial question is too vague and open-ended. |
Step 1: Determine how much you want to spend on a car.
Step 2: Buy the best car you can find for that money. Step 3: Enjoy whatever you end up with. Start with a budget and work with that, not the other way around, that's how people make themselves poor. |
Originally Posted by BinaryJay
(Post 5239332)
Step 1: Determine how much you want to spend on a car.
Step 2: Buy the best car you can find for that money. Step 3: Enjoy whatever you end up with. Start with a budget and work with that, not the other way around, that's how people make themselves poor. |
Most 350 has the shark fin. 300 doesnt
shark fin > no shark fin therefore, go with 350. |
I would say the difference would be worth about 3000 given same mileage and options...this is based on KBB value and the inherent interest in the newer "better" model
|
Originally Posted by bs0dxi
(Post 5240359)
Most 350 has the shark fin. 300 doesnt
shark fin > no shark fin therefore, go with 350. Is the shark fin the "wing" on the trunk lid? If so, my 06 GS300 has it. Also, I believe the GS300 will get better fuel economy based on having a 3 liter engine vs a 3.5 in the 2007. I am very pleased with my 06. |
Originally Posted by ingoodtime
(Post 5241207)
Is the shark fin the "wing" on the trunk lid? If so, my 06 GS300 has it. Also, I believe the GS300 will get better fuel economy based on having a 3 liter engine vs a 3.5 in the 2007. I am very pleased with my 06.
|
four thousand on average, but if same mileage, then maybe 3500.
|
Originally Posted by bs0dxi
(Post 5240359)
Most 350 has the shark fin. 300 doesnt
shark fin > no shark fin therefore, go with 350. I love my 350. If you get a 300 and love it, then that's all that matters. Test drive both of these two identical cars (I know this is a hypothetical question) and you will know what that extra amount is that YOU'RE willing to pay. |
Originally Posted by TWong1200
(Post 5241749)
:uh: Not sure about that statement. Not everyone cares for it. Completely subjective, IMHO.
I love my 350. If you get a 300 and love it, then that's all that matters. Test drive both of these two identical cars (I know this is a hypothetical question) and you will know what that extra amount is that YOU'RE willing to pay. |
haha yeah, to each his own. personally, the shark fin is a statement - it says yes, this is a luxury car. But I guess it comes down to fuel consumption and power. and of course cost, but make sure you dont regret it after the purchase.
|
Originally Posted by ingoodtime
(Post 5241207)
Is the shark fin the "wing" on the trunk lid? If so, my 06 GS300 has it. Also, I believe the GS300 will get better fuel economy based on having a 3 liter engine vs a 3.5 in the 2007. I am very pleased with my 06.
2006 3GS: 19 city/27 hwy for RWD 19 city/25 hwy for AWD http://www.fueleconomy.gov/FEG/bymod...Lexus_GS.shtml 2007 3GS: 19 city/26 hwy for RWD 18 city/25 hwy for AWD http://www.fueleconomy.gov/FEG/bymod...Lexus_GS.shtml |
I'd be willing to spend 5k for the updated navi, about 60 more hp, and bigger brakes.
|
^
yep true. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:47 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands