Tesla Business & News Thread Pt. 2
I just do not agree that this technology has the ability to think critically to where it is indisputably better than a human driver in every situation, that video is proof that isn't the case. In many situations I agree it likely is better, and in time it may get to where it is better in most or even all situations...but I still am not going to let this drive me down the road without paying attention myself.
All I can say is had any of us been driving that Model Y and paying attention we would not have run over that item.
Last edited by SW17LS; Sep 22, 2025 at 04:19 PM.
I'm really starting to see you cannot understand on any level what averages are.
Again, please stop being so rude and telling me what I do and do not understand. If you had a strong argument you wouldn't have to keep trying to discredit me to prove your point.
Here's 30 minutes of humans being complete morons behind the wheel.
This proves absolutely nothing, sure it suggests people are bad at driving but doesn't offer proof overall. That's exactly why we have accidents per miles driven statistics. Autonomous vehicles are way better overall both Tesla and Waymo's stats prove this. And no autonomous vehicles don't drive on a closed course, or drive in traffic that people don't they all drive on the same roads and encounter the same variables. This is exactly how Tesla's FSD learns it watches video of people driving.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Saying something over and over doesn't make it more true. No stats that are available prove this, this is your assumption but it is by no means a fact.
This is like saying I am a better than average driver because I have never had a fatal car accident, or even an at fault car accident (knock on wood). Well...I also have driven dramatically less than the total miles driven by the population so no...the data does not prove I am a better than average driver.
Last edited by SW17LS; Sep 22, 2025 at 04:49 PM.
There are no stats for me to post, because as I have said those stats don't yet exist. I have said repeatedly that they likely are safer, but that there isn't enough data to prove that yet.
Until autonomous vehicles are out in the world into the hands of every type of driver in every type of location all over the whole country and the populations used in a fully independent study are truly representative of the public as a whole we won't be able to prove they are safer with data. Right now we have to rely on data provided by the creators and manufacturers of these products and we have to make assumptions based on that non representative data to draw a conclusion. You may be comfortable drawing that conclusion from those sources but I am not.
How do I know that FSD is not as good as a human driver in every situation? Because I have seen it be not as good with my own eyes. Here's the video of it running over a debris in the roadway that a human driver would have easily avoided again:
They had 6 full seconds to react and FSD never reacted. So, in that situation a human driver would have been better.
https://youtu.be/PMppm1m6jio?si=KdOak4LhRThf6GDB
If I were driving I would have easily avoided that obstacle in the road, but the Tesla in FSD just ran right over it.
Per the DMV, there have been a total of 866 reports of incidents in California since 2014. That's likely a small fraction of total number of comparable incidents. It looks like Waymo and Zoox have the most reports in recent year.
But look at where and when Waymo is permitted for driverless testing, any time of the day or night, at all speeds, in all weather conditions - spoiled for size:
Basically the most populous parts the state, and remember they are permitted for any time of day in all conditions. There are going to be exponentially more than 866 incidents since 2014 in these metro areas.
List of all permit holders: https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicl...ermit-holders/
List of all reported incidents, with links to reports: https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicl...ision-reports/












