Good Old Kentucky Reliability?
The ES and LS are along the same spectrum of vehicle. if you like the ES, you will love the LS, etc. So I would not at all say they are different buyers, I would say there is a difference in what they can/want to spend.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 31,944
Likes: 2,737
From: North Carolina
Yep, I've owned three LSs and a GS and at each point have also cross shopped the ES (and also considered for daily duty independent of the GS/LS purchases). I really liked the current model but my leg awkwardly hit the center console
But that’s like saying I would have purchased a Rolls Royce if I could afford it. Just because you shopped something, doesn’t mean you are a buyer, it just means you considered it. Looking at a RR does not make one a buyer. If money was not a consideration & I was in the market for an LS, I wouldn’t look at an ES. This is splitting hairs here, but people buy cars at different stages in life for all kinds of reasons. People might want sporty & then start a family or maybe become empty nesters. I’m kind of a truck buyer at this stage in life, but there wasn’t a truck I was willing to buy in 2016, so I ended up with a Lexus. Previously, I was strictly coupes & sport sedans. Before that, economy cars & before that, I purchased 2 door personal luxury cars. My needs & wants drastically changed over 20 years. I always struggled with how Chevrolet sold their big sedans; the entry level cheapo was the Belaire, then the Impala, then the Caprice. Why not have just one model with the entire array of option choices, instead of 3 models? I just never understood the reasoning for that.
But that’s like saying I would have purchased a Rolls Royce if I could afford it. Just because you shopped something, doesn’t mean you are a buyer, it just means you considered it. Looking at a RR does not make one a buyer. If money was not a consideration & I was in the market for an LS, I wouldn’t look at an ES. This is splitting hairs here, but people buy cars at different stages in life for all kinds of reasons. People might want sporty & then start a family or maybe become empty nesters. I’m kind of a truck buyer at this stage in life, but there wasn’t a truck I was willing to buy in 2016, so I ended up with a Lexus. Previously, I was strictly coupes & sport sedans. Before that, economy cars & before that, I purchased 2 door personal luxury cars. My needs & wants drastically changed over 20 years. I always struggled with how Chevrolet sold their big sedans; the entry level cheapo was the Belaire, then the Impala, then the Caprice. Why not have just one model with the entire array of option choices, instead of 3 models? I just never understood the reasoning for that.
Money is ALWAYS a consideration. if you look in this very forum there are members who had multiple LSs and then got ESs as what they wanted to spend changed. Also remember everyone who bought a new ES could have bought a 3 year old CPO LS and chose not to.
Last edited by SW17LS; Jan 15, 2021 at 08:43 AM.
But that’s like saying I would have purchased a Rolls Royce if I could afford it. Just because you shopped something, doesn’t mean you are a buyer, it just means you considered it. Looking at a RR does not make one a buyer. If money was not a consideration & I was in the market for an LS, I wouldn’t look at an ES. This is splitting hairs here, but people buy cars at different stages in life for all kinds of reasons. People might want sporty & then start a family or maybe become empty nesters. I’m kind of a truck buyer at this stage in life, but there wasn’t a truck I was willing to buy in 2016, so I ended up with a Lexus. Previously, I was strictly coupes & sport sedans. Before that, economy cars & before that, I purchased 2 door personal luxury cars. My needs & wants drastically changed over 20 years. I always struggled with how Chevrolet sold their big sedans; the entry level cheapo was the Belaire, then the Impala, then the Caprice. Why not have just one model with the entire array of option choices, instead of 3 models? I just never understood the reasoning for that.
"Best" is a very subjective term. If your preference is high cost, heaviest, gas guzzler, highest quality materials, RR could be considered best. If you are choosing among a RR, LS and an ES, but your main interest is economy along with luxury, quality, reliability, but prestige is at the bottom of your list, the ES is a reasonable choice. Many people value depreciation, low cost of ownership and access to parts and service. "Best" only describes the criteria defined by the person using the term.
Late for this thread but had to share. Long time reader, first time post...have had 92 SC400, 2000Avlon, 2005 LS430(3), 2015 ES350. 2016 ES350(2) 2017 Avalon, 2018 ES300h J, 2022 ES300hUL Ken.
My latest ES300hUL is comparable to the 2018ES300h J. The LS430 were great but the newer ES I have now are hard to beat.
My latest ES300hUL is comparable to the 2018ES300h J. The LS430 were great but the newer ES I have now are hard to beat.
But that’s like saying I would have purchased a Rolls Royce if I could afford it. Just because you shopped something, doesn’t mean you are a buyer, it just means you considered it. Looking at a RR does not make one a buyer. If money was not a consideration & I was in the market for an LS, I wouldn’t look at an ES. This is splitting hairs here, but people buy cars at different stages in life for all kinds of reasons. People might want sporty & then start a family or maybe become empty nesters. I’m kind of a truck buyer at this stage in life, but there wasn’t a truck I was willing to buy in 2016, so I ended up with a Lexus. Previously, I was strictly coupes & sport sedans. Before that, economy cars & before that, I purchased 2 door personal luxury cars. My needs & wants drastically changed over 20 years. I always struggled with how Chevrolet sold their big sedans; the entry level cheapo was the Belaire, then the Impala, then the Caprice. Why not have just one model with the entire array of option choices, instead of 3 models? I just never understood the reasoning for that.
The ES is a better deal over the LS how? It’s not the same car. Put cost aside; these cars have different drive train, size & mostly way different luxury features. Just the inside door panels & dash are completely different. The “thunk” of closing a door is different. Simply speaking, you get what you pay for. One can always argue that a cheaper price is a better deal, but only when comparing apples to apples. The LS is on a different level of refinement from the ES.
And if something is a "better deal" then it is absolutely about money.











