'13 LS 460 vs '17 ES 350 HELP!!!
#16
Lead Lap
The CPO checklist, including information about minimum standards for tires and brakes is here.
http://www.lexus.com/documents/broch...t-brochure.pdf
#17
Lexus Fanatic
My experience has been though they usually do those things. In any event, these are items you can easily check the status of and negotiate them at the time of purchase
#19
Rookie
Thread Starter
Head spinning!!
Now I'm really confused as to which one to purchase!! Just kidding, and I really appreciate the excellent info. on both cars.
Just retired, so I don't know how many miles I will put on it per year. I averaged about 25,000 miles per yr. while working. I plan to travel a lot, but will fly to most places. I tend to keep my cars 8-10 years. I can afford the maintenance on the LS, but don't like to have to do it! Guess I have been spoiled with my 2008 ES 350. 9 yrs. 200,000 miles and basically "0" maintenance costs! ( other than tires, brakes & oil changes)!
I've got to weigh it all out, however I now know that if I go the ES route, I will spring for a brand new one!
Just retired, so I don't know how many miles I will put on it per year. I averaged about 25,000 miles per yr. while working. I plan to travel a lot, but will fly to most places. I tend to keep my cars 8-10 years. I can afford the maintenance on the LS, but don't like to have to do it! Guess I have been spoiled with my 2008 ES 350. 9 yrs. 200,000 miles and basically "0" maintenance costs! ( other than tires, brakes & oil changes)!
I've got to weigh it all out, however I now know that if I go the ES route, I will spring for a brand new one!
#20
Lexus Fanatic
Just retired, not going to be commuting, might be a good candidate for the LS. Have you driven it?
Don't get me wrong, the LS very well may go 200k miles with no trouble just like your old ES, it just has more potential costs.
Don't get me wrong, the LS very well may go 200k miles with no trouble just like your old ES, it just has more potential costs.
#21
Looking at 2 cars here.
2013 LS 460 with 51,000 miles for $36,500 MRSP
or
2017 ES 350 Luxury pkg. with 2,340 miles for $37,500 MRSP
My current car is 2008 ES 350 with 198,500 miles. Still runs great and looks great!
My question is simple, if I'm gonna spend approx. $37,000, which way should I go??
any advice would be greatly appreciated!!
2013 LS 460 with 51,000 miles for $36,500 MRSP
or
2017 ES 350 Luxury pkg. with 2,340 miles for $37,500 MRSP
My current car is 2008 ES 350 with 198,500 miles. Still runs great and looks great!
My question is simple, if I'm gonna spend approx. $37,000, which way should I go??
any advice would be greatly appreciated!!
My advice is to drive both cars and decide. Compare the options. Is the LS well equipped (options)? Factory warranty? Only you can decide.
The LS may be officially a previous generation model but it is a better car.
I prefer to drive my 08 LS than my wife's 17ES.
The LS is more refine, drives smoother, and built better quality inside and out. Very good hwy MPG.
I get close to 30 mpg hwy with stock wheel/tire (now down to 27 mpg due to +2 tire size)
My 08 LS interior looks dated but the interior quality material is a lot better than the 17 ES.
13 LS - More costly to maintain, premium gas (we put premium gas in the ES as well)
17 ES - better MPG, regular unleaded, new tech
#22
Lexus Fanatic
And the tech in the 13 LS is very similar to what's in the 17 ES.
#23
Lead Lap
In any case, anyone who is seriously considering buying any CPO vehicle should make sure that he/she gets a copy of the CPO checklist and that he/she examines it carefully to see what reconditioning has been done on the car and to make sure that wear-and-tear items are not at minimally acceptable levels.
#24
Now I'm really confused as to which one to purchase!! Just kidding, and I really appreciate the excellent info. on both cars.
Just retired, so I don't know how many miles I will put on it per year. I averaged about 25,000 miles per yr. while working. I plan to travel a lot, but will fly to most places. I tend to keep my cars 8-10 years. I can afford the maintenance on the LS, but don't like to have to do it! Guess I have been spoiled with my 2008 ES 350. 9 yrs. 200,000 miles and basically "0" maintenance costs! ( other than tires, brakes & oil changes)!
I've got to weigh it all out, however I now know that if I go the ES route, I will spring for a brand new one!
Just retired, so I don't know how many miles I will put on it per year. I averaged about 25,000 miles per yr. while working. I plan to travel a lot, but will fly to most places. I tend to keep my cars 8-10 years. I can afford the maintenance on the LS, but don't like to have to do it! Guess I have been spoiled with my 2008 ES 350. 9 yrs. 200,000 miles and basically "0" maintenance costs! ( other than tires, brakes & oil changes)!
I've got to weigh it all out, however I now know that if I go the ES route, I will spring for a brand new one!
#25
Regardless of what you decide, from my vantage point it would be foolish to pay that much for a used ES. Just buy new at that price point even if you have to go out of pocket just a bit more, but many people here are getting them brand new right around that price depending on options.
The LS is a better car, but you'll be out of pocket on repairs, but it shouldn't be much in total dollars.
There is something to be said about a brand new car versus a 6 year old used one even if the new one is not as nice. I personally don't think the LS is "twice the car" the ES is even though it's priced that way.
The LS is a better car, but you'll be out of pocket on repairs, but it shouldn't be much in total dollars.
There is something to be said about a brand new car versus a 6 year old used one even if the new one is not as nice. I personally don't think the LS is "twice the car" the ES is even though it's priced that way.
#26
Lexus Fanatic
I would buy a new ES vs a used LS personally. If I'm buying used already, I'd buy an older LS over a newer ES if both were used. I'm a new car guy though.
#27
Lead Lap
I believe that some of the worst car buys available are for 1 and 2 year old CPO vehicles.
The supply of those 1 and 2 year old vehicles is low because not many trade-ins or lease returns have yet come back into the dealers, and demand is high because there are many buyers who want an "almost new" car and who don't realize how much discounting is available on brand new cars. The result is that dealers are able to sell those "almost new" CPO cars for prices in the same range and sometimes even more than the prices for which someone could buy a new car.
When I was buying my new 2017 ES last fall, I was offered prices on brand new 2016 UL ESs that were actually as much as $3000 less than the prices for which the same dealers were trying to sell 2016 similarly equipped UL CPO vehicles. And the prices for which they were selling those 2016 CPO vehicles was virtually identical to the price that I paid for my brand new 2017 UL ES. And, because of the supply and demand situation and because there are many buyers who are unaware of the level of discounting on new cars, those dealers have been able to hold, for the most part, to the inflated prices for the CPO cars.
The supply of those 1 and 2 year old vehicles is low because not many trade-ins or lease returns have yet come back into the dealers, and demand is high because there are many buyers who want an "almost new" car and who don't realize how much discounting is available on brand new cars. The result is that dealers are able to sell those "almost new" CPO cars for prices in the same range and sometimes even more than the prices for which someone could buy a new car.
When I was buying my new 2017 ES last fall, I was offered prices on brand new 2016 UL ESs that were actually as much as $3000 less than the prices for which the same dealers were trying to sell 2016 similarly equipped UL CPO vehicles. And the prices for which they were selling those 2016 CPO vehicles was virtually identical to the price that I paid for my brand new 2017 UL ES. And, because of the supply and demand situation and because there are many buyers who are unaware of the level of discounting on new cars, those dealers have been able to hold, for the most part, to the inflated prices for the CPO cars.
#28
I believe that some of the worst car buys available are for 1 and 2 year old CPO vehicles.
The supply of those 1 and 2 year old vehicles is low because not many trade-ins or lease returns have yet come back into the dealers, and demand is high because there are many buyers who want an "almost new" car and who don't realize how much discounting is available on brand new cars. The result is that dealers are able to sell those "almost new" CPO cars for prices in the same range and sometimes even more than the prices for which someone could buy a new car.
When I was buying my new 2017 ES last fall, I was offered prices on brand new 2016 UL ESs that were actually as much as $3000 less than the prices for which the same dealers were trying to sell 2016 similarly equipped UL CPO vehicles. And the prices for which they were selling those 2016 CPO vehicles was virtually identical to the price that I paid for my brand new 2017 UL ES. And, because of the supply and demand situation and because there are many buyers who are unaware of the level of discounting on new cars, those dealers have been able to hold, for the most part, to the inflated prices for the CPO cars.
The supply of those 1 and 2 year old vehicles is low because not many trade-ins or lease returns have yet come back into the dealers, and demand is high because there are many buyers who want an "almost new" car and who don't realize how much discounting is available on brand new cars. The result is that dealers are able to sell those "almost new" CPO cars for prices in the same range and sometimes even more than the prices for which someone could buy a new car.
When I was buying my new 2017 ES last fall, I was offered prices on brand new 2016 UL ESs that were actually as much as $3000 less than the prices for which the same dealers were trying to sell 2016 similarly equipped UL CPO vehicles. And the prices for which they were selling those 2016 CPO vehicles was virtually identical to the price that I paid for my brand new 2017 UL ES. And, because of the supply and demand situation and because there are many buyers who are unaware of the level of discounting on new cars, those dealers have been able to hold, for the most part, to the inflated prices for the CPO cars.
#29
The CPO deals I see at the Lexus dealership really are awful, but maybe its different in other regions. I can't believe there's people that go for it but it must be smart from a marketing stand point because they seem to sell them.
You go on the car dealers website and its full of 1-2 year old CPO Lexus ES350's where they are asking like $38k.
Just psychologically, I need at least 20% off what a new car costs in order to buy used. When you start getting into like a savings of only like a couple thousand dollars, I'd rather have one brand new and I think you'll get much of that back when it comes time to sell.
You go on the car dealers website and its full of 1-2 year old CPO Lexus ES350's where they are asking like $38k.
Just psychologically, I need at least 20% off what a new car costs in order to buy used. When you start getting into like a savings of only like a couple thousand dollars, I'd rather have one brand new and I think you'll get much of that back when it comes time to sell.
#30
Lead Lap
I've been watching dealer sites for CPO NXs. Since, if I bought one, it would primarily be a winter vehicle that would be exposed to salt and the rock chips that are used to treat the winter roads here, I've been open to considering a used NX, but the CPO prices for a 2016 CPO NX are pretty much in the same range as what people are paying for brand new 2017 NXs.
Further, most used 1-5 year old Lexus vehicles that I see are CPO vehicles at Lexus dealers. Not many show up as private sales, and the ones that show up at non-Lexus dealers seem to be ones that are not in great condition. That makes it hard to find a used Lexus vehicle in great condition and whose price makes financial sense to pay relative to the cost of a new Lexus vehicle.