1mz vs 3vz
I'm looking at two different generations of ES300 (1st & 2nd), and have read over the forums ad naseum about the differences between them. Just as a bit of a background, I grew up in Japan, and my Father owned a Toyota Windom model, early 90's with the 3vz. Their version of our ES300 was a decent car actually, and I found it revved freely and even handled somewhat decently.
Fast forward to 2024, and I'm thinking about getting one for myself. I have a line on a '93 ES300 local car with low miles and decent maintenance records, older female owned. It needs plugs and wires changed out due to a misfire in one cylinder, and also has a wonky speedometer. Aside from that, the body is in very good condition.
My other choice is a 97-98 ES300, and I'm aware they will command a premium for me, at least here in Seattle. I like the body style of this generation better, and the interior is a little bit nicer as well. The sludging issues with the 1MZ don't bother me too much, as I'm looking to find a well maintained example.
So, what experiences can you share with me about both generations? I'm not really looking for a spec to spec comparison, so much as hearing from all of you as to your experiences, likes/dislikes based on your time with these two gens.
I love both powerplants a lot, and despite the somewhat spartan interior of the earlier 1st gens, I don't mind that. OK, I'm all ears. Let me hear the good, bad, and the ugly.
1MZ is nearly bullet proof, 3MZ is bulletproof this is Toyota's most reliable V6.
Yes, I've heard the 3MZ is quite the stout powerplant. If I were able to afford a higher price point, I might opt for an 02+ ES300, but alas, I do have a budget.







