ES - 1st to 4th Gen (1990-2006) Forum for all 1990 - 2006 ES300 and ES330 models. ES250 topics go here as well.

87 vs 91 unleaded fuel switch

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-10, 04:02 PM
  #1  
msdelexus
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
msdelexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 87 vs 91 unleaded fuel switch

Hi,

I've been using premium fuel eversince I had my 2003 es300.
My son often times uses the car and puts in regular fuel.
Will I have problems with the car's performance if I switch to regular grade fuel at this time? My es300 has about 85k miles.
Thanks!
Old 06-20-10, 06:14 PM
  #2  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

You shouldn't have any problem. The engine was designed to run on 87 octane anyways.
Old 06-20-10, 06:25 PM
  #3  
xspsi6
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (31)
 
xspsi6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Leesburg FL
Posts: 2,776
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yes running premium on an engine that was ment to run on 87 could do long term damage due to exsessive carbon build up and the slower burn times of premum will actually decrease performance and increase emissions.
Old 06-20-10, 07:51 PM
  #4  
JamesBond1
Pit Crew
 
JamesBond1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xspsi6
Yes running premium on an engine that was ment to run on 87 could do long term damage due to exsessive carbon build up and the slower burn times of premum will actually decrease performance and increase emissions.
Wow, everything you just said is wrong. You should read up on things before you start typing.
Old 06-20-10, 08:46 PM
  #5  
xspsi6
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (31)
 
xspsi6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Leesburg FL
Posts: 2,776
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Cool thanks for telling me I am wrong, I tune cars for a living so I guess I better go figure out wtf I am doing first.

So should I put 87 in my 600whp supra then? Please let me know because you seem to know it all!
Old 06-21-10, 10:03 AM
  #6  
JamesBond1
Pit Crew
 
JamesBond1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Your question now is the opposite of what you said earlier. Earlier you said "running premium on an engine that was meant to run on 87 could do long term damage". and now you're asking it again, just the other way around. Running premium on an engine that was meant to run on 87 WON'T cause long term damage. You also said “premium will actually decrease performance and increase emissions”. Premium will actually INCREASE performance and LOWER emissions.

Listen, just because you "tune cars for a living" doesn't mean you're well educated in the field of automotive. For example, I know car mechanics, who have 20+ experience, that have limit knowledge in some of the most common and easiest areas and/or make stupid decisions. I know a police officer that got fired for making a stupid mistake. And the best example of high status failure is your previous president. What I'm trying to say is: just because you "tune cars for a living" doesn't mean you're smart about the decisions you make and doesn’t mean you know everything about anything, for example: fuel.

I don't care about your supra or you, for that matter; nor do I want to argue. I was simply stating that what you said was wrong and I stick to it. I'm not here to make enemies...Let's just agree to disagree and let others think for themselves.

Last edited by JamesBond1; 06-21-10 at 10:09 AM.
Old 06-21-10, 10:17 AM
  #7  
GoodRevs
Instructor
 
GoodRevs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NH
Posts: 867
Received 45 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Subjectively speaking, There is a noticeable difference in performance between premium and regular in our 03 ES.
Old 06-21-10, 10:39 AM
  #8  
01LEXPL
Lead Lap
iTrader: (10)
 
01LEXPL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,400
Received 68 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

^^ here we go.... lol
Old 06-21-10, 12:24 PM
  #9  
BoostedE21
Pole Position
 
BoostedE21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xspsi6
Cool thanks for telling me I am wrong, I tune cars for a living so I guess I better go figure out wtf I am doing first.
When you're tuning your ECUs, you probably tune them to run on a specific octane rating, and ONLY at that octane rating. Modern stock ECUs are more flexible. Knock sensors can pull timing automatically if detonation or pinging is detected, and since octane level is sort of "flexible" (you can legally fill a container of 93 with 91 and sometimes lower if the station is low and that's all they have), that's a necessity.

So while on your specifically tuned settings running a lower than specified octane fuel might be detrimental, in a general sense it is not.

I have been running 87 on my ES for a while now. It's SLIGHTLY slower, but honestly, in normal driving I haven't noticed much. Fuel economy dropped about 10 miles to the whole tank. Since the price difference between regular and premium is 30 cents per gallon here, that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make.
Old 06-21-10, 02:33 PM
  #10  
xspsi6
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (31)
 
xspsi6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Leesburg FL
Posts: 2,776
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond1
Your question now is the opposite of what you said earlier. Earlier you said "running premium on an engine that was meant to run on 87 could do long term damage". and now you're asking it again, just the other way around. Running premium on an engine that was meant to run on 87 WON'T cause long term damage. You also said “premium will actually decrease performance and increase emissions”. Premium will actually INCREASE performance and LOWER emissions.

Listen, just because you "tune cars for a living" doesn't mean you're well educated in the field of automotive. For example, I know car mechanics, who have 20+ experience, that have limit knowledge in some of the most common and easiest areas and/or make stupid decisions. I know a police officer that got fired for making a stupid mistake. And the best example of high status failure is your previous president. What I'm trying to say is: just because you "tune cars for a living" doesn't mean you're smart about the decisions you make and doesn’t mean you know everything about anything, for example: fuel.

I don't care about your supra or you, for that matter; nor do I want to argue. I was simply stating that what you said was wrong and I stick to it. I'm not here to make enemies...Let's just agree to disagree and let others think for themselves.
First off I did not ask a question and second if you use premium which is a slower burning fuel you will create carbon build up faster because you don't have the compression or timing avl in a stock ecu to take advantage of the much much slower burn time of 93 oct fuel so yes it can potentially do damage over time and it will increase emissions as the combustion cycle is now burning slower due to the fact the factory ecu can't and never will be able to adapt properly to take advantage of the high oct fuel you are using thus creating way more unburnt fuel to help clog up converters etc

You simply can't properly ignite the overly rich mixture when using premium fuel unless you have a standalone ecu that has adjustments for timing and air fuel ratio per load.

But go ahead and keep throwing premium in a car thant was ment to run on 87 not my money!

Btw we are getting a good laugh here at work at the expense of this thread
Old 06-21-10, 04:36 PM
  #11  
JamesBond1
Pit Crew
 
JamesBond1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default


Originally Posted by xspsi6
First off I did not ask a question:
Yes you did...You asked if you can use 87 in your non-turbo supra.

Originally Posted by xspsi6
But go ahead and keep throwing premium in a car thant was ment to run on 87 not my money!:
True, it’s not your money, but it won't damage your engine, won't increase emissions, and won't decrease power is what I'm trying to say. You can’t seem to comprehend what I’m trying to explain.

Originally Posted by xspsi6
Btw we are getting a good laugh here at work at the expense of this
thread
Good, I'm glad you and your co-workers are laughing because in the end, I'm laughing.....at YOU!

p.s.... you ALWAYS seem to spell the word "meant" incorrectly (even in your past post) you spell it ”ment”. I do hope you can tune cars better than you can spell ahaha. Oh and good luck getting all that WHP to hook, in your supra.
Old 06-21-10, 04:53 PM
  #12  
BoostedE21
Pole Position
 
BoostedE21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 06-21-10, 05:08 PM
  #13  
JamesBond1
Pit Crew
 
JamesBond1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There you go xspsi6. It says "Select octane rating 87 or higher. For improved vehicle performance, the use of premium unleaded gasoline with an octane rating of 91 or higher is recommended."

That proves my point: that using higher octane WILL NOT damage your engine and WILL indeed boost performance as per the Lexus book says. Also, it will decrease emissions. 87 will do just fine but 91 won’t hurt your engine like you keep on saying it will.

Thank you BoostedE21. You have made proving my point a breeze.

Last edited by JamesBond1; 06-21-10 at 05:24 PM.
Old 06-21-10, 07:22 PM
  #14  
01LEXPL
Lead Lap
iTrader: (10)
 
01LEXPL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,400
Received 68 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JamesBond1
Good, I'm glad you and your co-workers are laughing because in the end, I'm laughing.....at YOU!

p.s.... you ALWAYS seem to spell the word "meant" incorrectly (even in your past post) you spell it "ment" I do hope you can tune cars better than you can spell ahaha. Oh and good luck getting all that WHP to hook, in your supra.
<grammar **** checking in>
Old 06-21-10, 07:49 PM
  #15  
JamesBond1
Pit Crew
 
JamesBond1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01LEXPL
<grammar **** checking in>
Ahaha. What's up 01LEXPL, how have you been? You're enjoying our chat, I see.


Quick Reply: 87 vs 91 unleaded fuel switch



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:54 AM.