When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I do think a lot of the complaints about this car go to the flawed decision to build an ES version of the Camry AWD in the first place. I think the statement about this powertrain being unsuitable for a premium car is dead on, in both performance and NVH.
This is true. People don't realize how the engine choice changes the entire feel of a vehicle. Great example is the E350 loaner I had from Mercedes, it was TERRIBLE. I hated it, but you drive an E450 spec'ed otherwise the same way and it just feels much better and more compelling. Weight over the front wheels of the larger engine will help the ride too.
The ES should just never have come with this engine.
Originally Posted by Striker223
The only reason I had an ES was because I requested one Monday when I scheduled the alignment. The other 10? Loaners that they had lined up and waiting were all SUVs of some sort, mostly the last gen RX and two NXs I think.
Same is true of my Lexus dealer and MB is the same way, almost all of the loaners are SUVs.
Got my 460 back. My god it's nice to drive this again! It feels like I have endless power on tap lol, didn't even hit 2000 rpm and it STILL moves better. The on ramp was actually fun vs annoying this time around, they did a good job as usual and it tracks amazing out to 130
I suppose the one advantage of the 250 over the 350 is no torque steer, which was a big complaint for many people. It still boggles my mind that Lexus never designed the 350 to be equipped with AWD.
I suppose the one advantage of the 250 over the 350 is no torque steer, which was a big complaint for many people. It still boggles my mind that Lexus never designed the 350 to be equipped with AWD.
It still has it, pulls to the right slightly if you send it full power. It's slight but 100% still there to a degree, nothing like the V6 sure but it's not a RWD bias at all and you can tell that easily. The system catches itself but you CAN feel it pull off right at the start
I figured it would be better in a gray or something, I like that black interiors wear well but they are very drab.
I'm convinced many that say the ES is bigger/why buy the LS have never driven an LS lol! This car would be SO much better with a turbo 4, I hate having to wind engines out to get a car moving.
I said it and I've driven both. And it wasn't just because its bigger inside. The few advantages the LS has over the ES aren't well executed, so I understand why people don't spend the extra money. The redesign made it more piggie size GS than LS. Not really a true flagship luxury car anymore.
I said it and I've driven both. And it wasn't just because its bigger inside. The few advantages the LS has over the ES aren't well executed, so I understand why people don't spend the extra money. The redesign made it more piggie size GS than LS. Not really a true flagship luxury car anymore.
I have also driven both many times, and that's just absurd. Like you I would not buy an LS500, but if I had to choose between the LS500 and an ES I would choose the LS500. I would also (and did) choose the GS over the ES every time because that additional quality and sophistication existed in the GS too. There is no circumstance where I would ever buy an ES at this point in my life.
This is true. People don't realize how the engine choice changes the entire feel of a vehicle. Great example is the E350 loaner I had from Mercedes, it was TERRIBLE. I hated it, but you drive an E450 spec'ed otherwise the same way and it just feels much better and more compelling. Weight over the front wheels of the larger engine will help the ride too.
The ES should just never have come with this engine..
Car and Driver agreed with you. They tested the ES 250 when it came out last year and, in a polite sort of way, they unloaded on it almost as much as you did. The money shot: It costs as much as two of the Camrys it structurally and behaviorally resembles.
I have also driven both many times, and that's just absurd. Like you I would not buy an LS500, but if I had to choose between the LS500 and an ES I would choose the LS500. I would also (and did) choose the GS over the ES every time because that additional quality and sophistication existed in the GS too. There is no circumstance where I would ever buy an ES at this point in my life.
That's the problem though, if Lexus customers truly cared about that extra bit of refinement and ability, the GS wouldn't be dead. I don't think anyone will argue that the LS isn't better than the ES, but for the money, it's easy to see why the ES has outlived the GS and continues to thrive while the LS continues to sink.
That's the problem though, if Lexus customers truly cared about that extra bit of refinement and ability, the GS wouldn't be dead. I don't think anyone will argue that the LS isn't better than the ES, but for the money, it's easy to see why the ES has outlived the GS and continues to thrive while the LS continues to sink.
Most customers don't care, doesn't mean that a luxury car company should just throw in the towel. Plenty of consumers out there that do care.