Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

AAA testing finds driver-assistance tech is 'far from reliable'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-20, 08:12 AM
  #1  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default AAA testing finds driver-assistance tech is 'far from reliable'

The systems 'do not perform consistently, especially in real-word scenarios'

DETROIT — Two tests by AAA during the past two years show that partially automated driving systems don’t always function properly, so the auto club is recommending that car companies limit their use.

Researchers with AAA recently tested systems from five manufacturers over a distance of 4,000 miles, and said they encountered problems every eight miles.
ADVERTISEMENTMost of the issues involved systems designed to keep vehicles in their lane, but the tests discovered that many had trouble spotting simulated broken-down vehicles in their path. About two-thirds of the time the test vehicles hit the broken-down car, at an average speed of 25 mph (40 kph), according to the study.

It was AAA’s second round of tests on the systems. Researchers said little had changed from a test of four other vehicles in 2018, prompting the recommendation that automakers stop including the technology on more models.

“AAA has repeatedly found that active driving assistance systems do not perform consistently, especially in real-world scenarios,” said Greg Brannon, AAA’s director of automotive engineering. “Automakers need to work toward more dependable technology including improving lane keeping assistance.”

Also the systems, which combine control of acceleration, braking and steering, often quit working with little notice to drivers, AAA found. That could cause a dangerous situation if the driver isn’t fully engaged and has to make an emergency decision.

AAA tested five vehicles at several research centers, with drivers and instruments monitoring their performance. Included this year were a 2019 BMW X7 SUV, a 2019 Cadillac CT6 sedan, a 2019 Ford Edge SUV, a 2020 Kia Telluride SUV and a 2020 Subaru Outback SUV. Their systems have names like Kia’s “Highway Driving Assist,” Subaru’s “EyeSight,” Ford’s “Co-Pilot 360,” Cadillac’s “Super Cruise,” and BMW’s “Active Driving Assistant Professional.”

The results were similar to those found in 2018 testing by AAA of four other vehicles including a 2017 Tesla Model S with the company’s “Autopilot” system.

Messages were left Wednesday seeking comment from the five automakers in this year’s test. Automakers generally say they tell drivers that their cars aren’t fully self-driving and that they should always be alert and ready to intervene.

AAA said most owners manuals explain that the systems have trouble spotting stationary objects.

The most recent tests show that the systems aren’t improving much, even as automakers move them into more mainstream models. Brannon said that can be a problem.

People who bought systems when they first came out generally were early adopters who know more about technology, Brannon said. But as the systems make their way into more mainstream models, people who are less tech-savvy will be driving them, he said.

“People are really less familiar and less likely to really engage in understanding how the systems work,” he said. “That just assume they do work. That could be a really dangerous assumption.”

Also, research has shown that people become overly reliant on the technology, which could be dangerous when the systems don’t work, he said. Also, there’s no standardized way for the vehicles to notify drivers that the systems are disengaging. Some just have a green light on the dash, while the Cadillac’s steering wheel vibrates and a green light goes to flashing red, he said.

In real-road tests, all of the systems had trouble keeping the vehicles in their lanes, and they came too close to other vehicles and guardrails, AAA said. Test track examinations of three vehicles, the Kia Telluride, BMW X7 and Subaru Outback, found that all had trouble spotting a simulated broken-down vehicle in their lane most of the time, Brannon said.

The Cadillac system couldn’t be tested on the track because General Motors limits use to divided highways, while the Ford system also wouldn’t work on the track. But both systems had problems on real roads, Brannon said.

He said that problems with the system could slow the adoption of fully autonomous vehicles because owners who experience the driver-assist technology may not trust it.
Source
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 08-06-20, 09:01 AM
  #2  
ABC
Racer

 
ABC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,720
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Not surprising - watch any number of youtube videos on autopilot or comma Ai and you can clearly see they aren't consistent, especially on city and back roads. They seem to do well on highways though.
ABC is offline  
Old 08-06-20, 09:59 AM
  #3  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,408
Received 162 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Doesnt really take a genius to figure that one out. I am grateful for BSM and parking sensors. Other than those I wouldnt trust anything else.
situman is offline  
Old 08-06-20, 12:15 PM
  #4  
RXSF
Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,044
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

If you completely trust the system, then you are an idiot. But I for one love the driving assistance tech in my MB. It is great for long stretches of straight road, and if I keep the speed 65mph or under, it does well in curves. However, at anything higher, it doesn't turn enough and will veer into the adjacent lane. It also depends on how strong and visible the lane markings are, which is a crapshoot in my area. When the car is turning itself on the highway, and there is a car next to me, I will still keep my hands poised over the wheel to take over at an instant. Even with these negatives, I wouldn't buy another car without it.
RXSF is offline  
Old 08-06-20, 01:28 PM
  #5  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,746
Received 2,126 Likes on 1,378 Posts
Default

AAA states obvious in sensational article.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 08-06-20, 01:39 PM
  #6  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

LOL, a few years back there was a big thread where all of us have been arguing whether or not fully autonomous cars are going to take over in a few decades. The way this country has been, I won't be surprised if we retard to riding donkeys in a couple of decades.

Och is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gojirra99
Car Chat
1073
10-05-22 03:53 PM



Quick Reply: AAA testing finds driver-assistance tech is 'far from reliable'



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:37 AM.