Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Ford knew Focus, Fiesta models had flawed transmission, sold them anyway

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-19, 10:23 AM
  #16  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,455
Received 59 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Missing Alan Mulally. He really turned around Ford after William Clay Ford Jr. bungled it as did his predecessors before him.
Agreed, although I find it interesting that the 2 major corporations that he rescued have both had major safety cover-up scandals in 2019.
FrankReynoldsCPA is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 10:27 AM
  #17  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrettJacks
Agreed, although I find it interesting that the 2 major corporations that he rescued have both had major safety cover-up scandals in 2019.
Haha that is a good point. Who knows what he had a hand in. But overall the product at least on Ford's side was miles ahead of what it was
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 10:31 AM
  #18  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,455
Received 59 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

I think the Boeing scandal is definitely unrelated to him as he was long gone by the time they developed the 737 MAX.

The question is just how much he knew about the Focus issues at Ford. It seems like Fields operated fairly independently under him and this isn't something that would have been elevated to Mulally's desk...especially given that it's a cover up.
FrankReynoldsCPA is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 10:35 AM
  #19  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrettJacks
I think the Boeing scandal is definitely unrelated to him as he was long gone by the time they developed the 737 MAX.

The question is just how much he knew about the Focus issues at Ford. It seems like Fields operated fairly independently under him and this isn't something that would have been elevated to Mulally's desk...especially given that it's a cover up.
Mulally and Mary Barra make the big overall decisions. So yes you're probably right that Mark Fields likely had more of a hand in covering up transmission issues since he worked under and had some autonomy.
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 02:07 PM
  #20  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,455
Received 59 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Also I think this confirms my belief that there are 2 Ford Motor Companies.

There's the company that produces trucks and SUVs. This company gets resources because it's a giant money printer.

Then there's the company that produces cars. That company is dying off and has been starved for years.


If you read the article, they said that they'd had a similar concern come up with the transmission for the trucks in development, but it got a 100% different response from management. Which makes sense because the truck transmissions have been rock solid since the mid 2000's, perhaps best in class(to the point where GM uses the Ford designed 10-speed)
FrankReynoldsCPA is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 02:12 PM
  #21  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrettJacks
Also I think this confirms my belief that there are 2 Ford Motor Companies.

There's the company that produces trucks and SUVs. This company gets resources because it's a giant money printer.

Then there's the company that produces cars. That company is dying off and has been starved for years.
Ford Motor Truck Company

Ford of Europe



Originally Posted by BrettJacks
If you read the article, they said that they'd had a similar concern come up with the transmission for the trucks in development, but it got a 100% different response from management. Which makes sense because the truck transmissions have been rock solid since the mid 2000's, perhaps best in class(to the point where GM uses the Ford designed 10-speed)
I believe the Mustang transmission for 2015- somewhat current had some issues as well. Also I believe it is manufactured in China.
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 02:17 PM
  #22  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,455
Received 59 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Ford Motor Truck Company

Ford of Europe





I believe the Mustang transmission for 2015- somewhat current had some issues as well. Also I believe it is manufactured in China.

The manual transmission? I have indeed heard bad things about it. The automatics have been shared with the F-150. The 6R80 from 2015-2017 and the 10R80 from 2018+. Other than some programming flaws common to a new transmission, i believe those have both been fine.
FrankReynoldsCPA is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 02:44 PM
  #23  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrettJacks
The manual transmission? I have indeed heard bad things about it. The automatics have been shared with the F-150. The 6R80 from 2015-2017 and the 10R80 from 2018+. Other than some programming flaws common to a new transmission, i believe those have both been fine.
Yes I believe it was the manual transmission that the issues.
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 02:57 PM
  #24  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,516
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrettJacks
Then there's the company that produces cars. That company is dying off and has been starved for years.
True, but there is no credible reason for them being starved and dying off, other than they seem to be doing that GM is trying to do....force customers out of passenger cars into higher-profit SUVs.


If you read the article, they said that they'd had a similar concern come up with the transmission for the trucks in development, but it got a 100% different response from management. Which makes sense because the truck transmissions have been rock solid since the mid 2000's, perhaps best in class(to the point where GM uses the Ford designed 10-speed)
GM and Ford jointly co-developed the latest RWD 10-speed.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 03:17 PM
  #25  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,455
Received 59 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
GM and Ford jointly co-developed the latest RWD 10-speed.
Yes and no. While GM had some input, it was a Ford design.

They teamed up to cooperate on 9 and 10 speed transmissions. GM would design the 9 speed and Ford would design the 10 speed and then they would both use them in their vehicles, modifying them as needed.

The result was that both companies have adopted the 10 speed in their lineups(Ford moreso than GM). Ford did not, however, adopt the 9-speed GM designed it. They made a significant number of changes, reducing it to an 8-speed for their use.
FrankReynoldsCPA is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 04:17 PM
  #26  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,516
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrettJacks
Yes and no. While GM had some input, it was a Ford design.

They teamed up to cooperate on 9 and 10 speed transmissions. GM would design the 9 speed and Ford would design the 10 speed and then they would both use them in their vehicles, modifying them as needed.

The result was that both companies have adopted the 10 speed in their lineups (Ford more so than GM). Ford did not, however, adopt the 9-speed GM designed it. They made a significant number of changes, reducing it to an 8-speed for their use.
Yes, I know that Ford opted not to use the FWD 9-speed. They felt that it did not add enough fuel economy to justify its complexity, though I get very good mileage with that unit in my Lacrosse.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 05:37 PM
  #27  
shadow1118
Intermediate
 
shadow1118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: FL
Posts: 498
Received 43 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrettJacks
Yes and no. While GM had some input, it was a Ford design.

They teamed up to cooperate on 9 and 10 speed transmissions. GM would design the 9 speed and Ford would design the 10 speed and then they would both use them in their vehicles, modifying them as needed.

The result was that both companies have adopted the 10 speed in their lineups(Ford moreso than GM). Ford did not, however, adopt the 9-speed GM designed it. They made a significant number of changes, reducing it to an 8-speed for their use.
I have a 2019 Camaro 2SS w/ the A10 tranny. People are reporting GM did a much better job with the tuning of it , then ford all over the Camaro forums and these people reporting had both the mustang and the camaro. GM did a much job with it then Ford. Its on par with the 8 speed in the RCF, because I had an RCF before and IMO they are the same performance wise.
shadow1118 is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 06:44 PM
  #28  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 227 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shadow1118
I have a 2019 Camaro 2SS w/ the A10 tranny. People are reporting GM did a much better job with the tuning of it , then ford all over the Camaro forums and these people reporting had both the mustang and the camaro. GM did a much job with it then Ford. Its on par with the 8 speed in the RCF, because I had an RCF before and IMO they are the same performance wise.
I wonder why they just don't use the ZF8 speed as it's far better than any of the other trannies. I wonder if the cost per tranny is too much vs in house solutions?
EZZ is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 07:51 PM
  #29  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
Never drove one, but read many times and agin that the DCT was more jerky than a typical DCT like the excellent VAG ones.
Originally Posted by mmarshall
In smoothness, the early VW/Audi DCTs were like butter, and operated like clockwork. For some reason (I don't know why) later VW units were OK, but not quite as smooth. The Ford DPS6, though, apparently, was garbage from Day One.
The Ford-Getrag PowerShift dual-clutch transmission uses dry clutches whereas the first-generation VW unit used wet clutches. Wet clutches, bathed in oil, are known to be smoother but less efficient than dry clutches because the wet clutch may slip.

The rough operation of the Ford-Getrag may be attributed to the fact that it uses dry clutches but the other problems may not be.

The second-generation VW unit switched to dry clutches.
Sulu is offline  
Old 07-12-19, 08:35 PM
  #30  
shadow1118
Intermediate
 
shadow1118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: FL
Posts: 498
Received 43 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
I wonder why they just don't use the ZF8 speed as it's far better than any of the other trannies. I wonder if the cost per tranny is too much vs in house solutions?




I wish the new camaro had an RCF tranny, but this 10 speed is honestly nothing to complain about. It impressed me coming from an RCF. For some reasons 10 speeds seem more natural when the car changes gear.

Last edited by shadow1118; 07-12-19 at 10:52 PM.
shadow1118 is offline  


Quick Reply: Ford knew Focus, Fiesta models had flawed transmission, sold them anyway



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:39 AM.