Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

MM Test-Drive: 2019 Lexus UX Hybrid AWD F-Sport (updated static review)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-19, 12:18 PM
  #31  
oldcajun
Racer
 
oldcajun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,419
Received 49 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
In the write-up, I mentioned the X1 and QX30 as probably the two closest competitors. The others, I felt, were not quite as close.
You are aware that the GLA and QX30 are the same vehicle except for body parts and styling aren't you?

Last edited by oldcajun; 01-04-19 at 01:48 PM.
oldcajun is offline  
Old 01-04-19, 12:23 PM
  #32  
rogerh00
Racer
 
rogerh00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,457
Received 45 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

The inclusion of a touch pad is a total deal breaker for me. I lived with the awful thing in an NX for 3 years. I'm so glad I'm rid of it. Never again. Lexus needs to wake up.
rogerh00 is offline  
Old 01-04-19, 12:29 PM
  #33  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Forum Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,310
Received 126 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Partly true, but, from what the specs I've seen and read, wheelbase or not, the GLA, XC40, and 3 are generally considered in the A (compact) class, rather than the B (Subcompact) class, where the UX falls. You may disagree with my classification (I respect that), but that is hardly a reason to call someone ignorant.
I called the omission of certain models ignorant, not you. But I'll tell you what. From now on I will abstain from your write-up posts because I wholeheartedly disagree with what you believe is competition. Not just from this thread. There are plenty of cases. The EcoSport and Trax denail. A 2016 write-up of the GX460 you claimed a Lincoln MKX. And the one that stands out the most in my mind was the 2018 Stinger write-up where you claimed (though have since edited with an asterisk) the RWD Stinger competes with the FWD Maxima. Have a nice day sir.
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 01-04-19, 12:55 PM
  #34  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 75,240
Received 2,502 Likes on 1,645 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oldcajun
You are aware that the CLA and QX30 are the same vehicle except for body parts and styling aren't you?
could be wrong, but QX30 seems taller? certainly is better looking imo.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 01-04-19, 01:18 PM
  #35  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,498
Received 68 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411



No, but you did say it's too small for the American market. Lexus simply created it to fill a space that it's competitors compete in
What would you like me to say then? That it will sell well. Yes, it was made to fill a space. I just think a 2.0 non turbo engine directly lifted from the Corolla is a hard thing to sell to the American people. <<< that and the fact that the UX is a small package for an upmarket price. How many units do you really expect this model to sell? Lack of awd to the 2.0 is an issue IMO.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 01-04-19 at 01:23 PM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 01-04-19, 01:25 PM
  #36  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,498
Received 68 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
I called the omission of certain models ignorant, not you. But I'll tell you what. From now on I will abstain from your write-up posts because I wholeheartedly disagree with what you believe is competition. Not just from this thread. There are plenty of cases. The EcoSport and Trax denail. A 2016 write-up of the GX460 you claimed a Lincoln MKX. And the one that stands out the most in my mind was the 2018 Stinger write-up where you claimed (though have since edited with an asterisk) the RWD Stinger competes with the FWD Maxima. Have a nice day sir.
Hard to believe the MB GLA and the Infiniti QX30 are not in the same category as the UX. I don’t even know what the dimensions are, but it seems they should be included.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 01-04-19, 01:49 PM
  #37  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 75,240
Received 2,502 Likes on 1,645 Posts
Default

GLA is no great looker either with the long front overhang and tiny gap from front wheels to front door, but it does have over 200hp, and the amg version has 375 stomping hp with torque-vectoring awd for serious grins and all have apple carplay, android auto, and a more conventional interior.

the ux though is longer, wider, and taller and it's WORLDS better than the CT was.

Last edited by bitkahuna; 01-04-19 at 01:53 PM.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 01-04-19, 01:52 PM
  #38  
oldcajun
Racer
 
oldcajun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,419
Received 49 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
could be wrong, but QX30 seems taller? certainly is better looking imo.
Yes, my error. My mind said GLA but my fingers typed CLA. Mechanically the same but different bodies. I have edited my post.
oldcajun is offline  
Old 01-04-19, 03:04 PM
  #39  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,694
Received 2,762 Likes on 1,972 Posts
Default

I saw one at the Lexus dealer today while I was there with my friend looking at the ES. I agree, interior is better than the CT, but not by a whole lot.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 01-04-19, 04:03 PM
  #40  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,436
Received 88 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
I called the omission of certain models ignorant, not you. But I'll tell you what. From now on I will abstain from your write-up posts because I wholeheartedly disagree with what you believe is competition.
That's up to you, but I welcome your opinions.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-04-19, 04:06 PM
  #41  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,436
Received 88 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
the ux though is longer, wider, and taller and it's WORLDS better than the CT was.
It's better if you want more ground clearance (the CT practically drags the ground LOL).
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-04-19, 04:40 PM
  #42  
sears1234
Pole Position
 
sears1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: WA
Posts: 260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

UX and MB GLA is like double edge sword, it can lure some new comer jumping into the brand, but it can easily push the existing customers away.

I was a very a very loyal Lexus customer, I started hating Lexus since I bought CT back in 2010. But a new buyer may find CT/UX very attractive.

Last edited by sears1234; 01-04-19 at 05:51 PM.
sears1234 is offline  
Old 01-05-19, 08:23 AM
  #43  
EXE46
Lead Lap
 
EXE46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Sofla
Posts: 581
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

This is a lousy offering from Lexus, in the end, all that matters is if the car meets the intended sales figures. Time will tell if it was a success or one of their many failures. I certainly would not buy this car. The NX already looks and feels cheap "in my opinion" but again I am not the intended demographic. I hope it fails, tired of seeing these lousy cheap sub compact crossovers that are being built to take market share from sedans.
EXE46 is offline  
Old 01-05-19, 08:53 AM
  #44  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,498
Received 68 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EXE46
This is a lousy offering from Lexus, in the end, all that matters is if the car meets the intended sales figures. Time will tell if it was a success or one of their many failures. I certainly would not buy this car. The NX already looks and feels cheap "in my opinion" but again I am not the intended demographic. I hope it fails, tired of seeing these lousy cheap sub compact crossovers that are being built to take market share from sedans.
Nicely worded. However, seems like this new UX is critic approved in such a strange way. I don’t get it.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 01-05-19, 09:31 AM
  #45  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,436
Received 88 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EXE46
I hope it fails, tired of seeing these lousy cheap sub compact crossovers that are being built to take market share from sedans.
Well, I don't want to see anything fail just for the sake of failing...remember, the company's designers, planners, and the people in the assembly-plants, have put a lot of time and effort into bringing any new vehicle to market. If and when it fails, they potentially suffer. But I absolutely do agree with the rest of your statement. Many people are buying these vehicles simply because they have become a craze, and are trying to keep up with the Joneses....though they (admittedly) offer some features that many sedans don't......AWD, a higher ground-stance, and more cargo space.


mmarshall is offline  


Quick Reply: MM Test-Drive: 2019 Lexus UX Hybrid AWD F-Sport (updated static review)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:32 PM.