This LS-Powered Lexus IS300 Makes Over 1,000HP
 

This LS-Powered Lexus IS300 Makes Over 1,000HP
By Curated Content Editor

The big radial drag tires in the back provide a hint as to what sort of power band this first-gen IS packs.

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.clu...2583ae69b8.jpg

Why, Why would someone EVER swap out a 2JZ engine for an LS? People do this alot and it blows my mind. Short of the 2JZ blowing up (which is uncommon), there is no reason for it. the 2JZ inline-6 is capable of producing just as much, if not more power and torque than an LS.

exactly, the 1st gen IS is more or less the easiest and cheapest way to recreate the supra experience, and that's all down to the 2JZ

In the case of something not as capable of taking mods in stock form, I get it, but the 2JZ is probably the strongest stock bottom-end you can get in any modern engine.

For arguments sake the vvti 2jzge are the weakest of the bunch with the rods being thinner. The non vvti GE or gte vvti have thicker rods and can handle more abuse.

Sounds like the build was about going the non typical route. Tons of LS aftermarket options too.

Why the complaints? There are more 2JZ-GTE IS300's out there than LS swapped ones anyway. Plus it's a V8 soundtrack, something an inline-six won't ever be

I can respect that. Aint nothin wrong with an LS motor!

well to me it's a similar thing of LS swapping an RX-7, the LS engine on paper basically makes everything better, but it takes away the car's characteristics that first made it loved

if you want a V8 powered IS, use a 1UZ and keep it yota!

It bothers me when the spirit of the car is lost especially if the car came with an inline 6. At least use an engine from the same manufacturer.

Oh don't get me wrong, I love the LS engines. I have a car with an LS3 in it :D I just think the whole "LS swap it" fad has gone a little too far. In some cases, sure, it makes sense. Like in an RX-7 or 8 because the original engines are problem children, or in the case of a 911 with a blown up engine, or when you want to build something ridiculous (my buddy put one in a 2003 Focus 2dr hatch and did a RWD coversion), but honestly, I think a 1UZ would have been better to use here. They probably aren't stronger than an LS, and they cost more to build, but it would have kept the car more in line with its roots. And to me, that's important.

^This. I have seen people put LS's in everything, from Jeep CJ7's to motorcycles, and even riding mowers...its a trend that really is quite hilarious. I myself am going to build an LS or LT for my 1964 Biscayne with the time comes.