Hoovey (mini) Review: 2019 Lexus UX 200/250h
#16
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
#17
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,044
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes
on
42 Posts
Hoovey, how do you think this drove in comparison to the X1? I know the X1 is still a crowd favorite in terms of space efficiency and utility. We all know BMW has great lease deals and the 0 maintenance during those years is a big plus. I know its getting a bit dated but it can still hold a candle to the new players. I am looking to getting rid of my RXh for an X1 next week, just need to sell my RX on craiglist .
#18
Lexus Test Driver
Good review. The hybrid has my attention. Do we know what projected mpg's are?
#19
The pursuit of F
Nice quick review Hoovey! I'm the same height as you and found the rear a bit tight on legroom, but do-able for say even a longer 2-3 hours trip.
I took an approx measurement of the cargo's floor to ceiling height of about 20-21 inches for the 250h which is on the shallow side. Add about 3 inches depth for the 200. NX, if memory serves me was 26, and RX is 29.
1. As per RXSF and MM - How's the NVH and ride quality? The buzz/drone was a bit disappointing in
recent review but as a previous CT-owner, I don't mind since I rarely hit the power to beat my prior MPG achievements!
2. The DirectShift CVT (physical 1st gear) is only with the 2L non-hybrid per the Japan specs and European reviews where they state the 2L Hybrid has the more conventional "eCVT". Did you notice any difference when driving both cars? Did you engage the paddle shifters?
@Sulu - agree, many typos and spec errors in the Canadian spec sheet like the DirectShift CVT (only for the 200), turning circle, HUD and Nav missing in the F Sport S2, interior specs, etc. I pointed those out to my dealer a couple weeks ago who in turn submitted it to Corp. Let's see.
For the UX, the 250h is the way to go. If you can accept a drop of 4 cu ft in cargo, it's only a 2K premium for a torquier powertrain, lowered NVH, and eAWD.
I took an approx measurement of the cargo's floor to ceiling height of about 20-21 inches for the 250h which is on the shallow side. Add about 3 inches depth for the 200. NX, if memory serves me was 26, and RX is 29.
1. As per RXSF and MM - How's the NVH and ride quality? The buzz/drone was a bit disappointing in
2. The DirectShift CVT (physical 1st gear) is only with the 2L non-hybrid per the Japan specs and European reviews where they state the 2L Hybrid has the more conventional "eCVT". Did you notice any difference when driving both cars? Did you engage the paddle shifters?
@Sulu - agree, many typos and spec errors in the Canadian spec sheet like the DirectShift CVT (only for the 200), turning circle, HUD and Nav missing in the F Sport S2, interior specs, etc. I pointed those out to my dealer a couple weeks ago who in turn submitted it to Corp. Let's see.
For the UX, the 250h is the way to go. If you can accept a drop of 4 cu ft in cargo, it's only a 2K premium for a torquier powertrain, lowered NVH, and eAWD.
Last edited by corradoMR2; 11-17-18 at 05:21 AM.
#20
Lexus Fanatic
It remains to be confirmed but it looks like the Canadian UX will come with a spare tire but the UX Hybrid will not. (Specifications have just been posted and I have seen a number of issues that I believe are mistakes, so I am waiting to see if there are any changes to on-line list of specifications.)
.
#21
Lexus Fanatic
2. The DirectShift CVT (physical 1st gear) is only with the 2L non-hybrid per the Japan specs and European reviews where they state the 2L Hybrid has the more conventional "eCVT". Did you notice any difference when driving both cars? Did you engage the paddle shifters?
adaptive variable suspension.
sunroof is not standard (but standard in Canada)
rear tint is an option
power seats are optional
US has a no moon roof option.
Canada has 17" as standard while the US only comes with 18" tires, so run flats in the US are a standard item.
So there could be other changes that don't match.
Last edited by Toys4RJill; 11-17-18 at 06:23 AM.
#22
Lexus Champion
Thanks. That is where I went to find the specifications and since I noticed so many small errors, I do not know what is true and what is not. I will have to wait until the model is in the showroom and Lexus Canada has had time to firm-up and correct the listed specifications.
#23
Lexus Champion
Nice quick review Hoovey! I'm the same height as you and found the rear a bit tight on legroom, but do-able for say even a longer 2-3 hours trip.
I took an approx measurement of the cargo's floor to ceiling height of about 20-21 inches for the 250h which is on the shallow side. Add about 3 inches depth for the 200. NX, if memory serves me was 26, and RX is 29.
1. As per RXSF and MM - How's the NVH and ride quality? The buzz/drone was a bit disappointing in Redline's youtube recent review but as a previous CT-owner, I don't mind since I rarely hit the power to beat my prior MPG achievements!
2. The DirectShift CVT (physical 1st gear) is only with the 2L non-hybrid per the Japan specs and European reviews where they state the 2L Hybrid has the more conventional "eCVT". Did you notice any difference when driving both cars? Did you engage the paddle shifters?
@Sulu - agree, many typos and spec errors in the Canadian spec sheet like the DirectShift CVT (only for the 200), turning circle, HUD and Nav missing in the F Sport S2, interior specs, etc. I pointed those out to my dealer a couple weeks ago who in turn submitted it to Corp. Let's see.
For the UX, the 250h is the way to go. If you can accept a drop of 4 cu ft in cargo, it's only a 2K premium for a torquier powertrain, lowered NVH, and eAWD.
I took an approx measurement of the cargo's floor to ceiling height of about 20-21 inches for the 250h which is on the shallow side. Add about 3 inches depth for the 200. NX, if memory serves me was 26, and RX is 29.
1. As per RXSF and MM - How's the NVH and ride quality? The buzz/drone was a bit disappointing in Redline's youtube recent review but as a previous CT-owner, I don't mind since I rarely hit the power to beat my prior MPG achievements!
2. The DirectShift CVT (physical 1st gear) is only with the 2L non-hybrid per the Japan specs and European reviews where they state the 2L Hybrid has the more conventional "eCVT". Did you notice any difference when driving both cars? Did you engage the paddle shifters?
@Sulu - agree, many typos and spec errors in the Canadian spec sheet like the DirectShift CVT (only for the 200), turning circle, HUD and Nav missing in the F Sport S2, interior specs, etc. I pointed those out to my dealer a couple weeks ago who in turn submitted it to Corp. Let's see.
For the UX, the 250h is the way to go. If you can accept a drop of 4 cu ft in cargo, it's only a 2K premium for a torquier powertrain, lowered NVH, and eAWD.
It seems to me that the reviewer was too obsessed about the UX being under-powered; from first hearing that the engine would not be turbocharged (while its competitors would be), he seemed to want to do everything possible to confirm that the car indeed is under-powered.
#24
"No problem" is a slangy term that is often used by millennials—and by many Gen Xers—in exchanges in which "you're welcome" is traditionally voiced
Hoovey, how do you think this drove in comparison to the X1? I know the X1 is still a crowd favorite in terms of space efficiency and utility. We all know BMW has great lease deals and the 0 maintenance during those years is a big plus. I know its getting a bit dated but it can still hold a candle to the new players. I am looking to getting rid of my RXh for an X1 next week, just need to sell my RX on craiglist .
1. As per RXSF and MM - How's the NVH and ride quality? The buzz/drone was a bit disappointing in Redline's youtube recent review but as a previous CT-owner, I don't mind since I rarely hit the power to beat my prior MPG achievements!
2. The DirectShift CVT (physical 1st gear) is only with the 2L non-hybrid per the Japan specs and European reviews where they state the 2L Hybrid has the more conventional "eCVT". Did you notice any difference when driving both cars? Did you engage the paddle shifters?
@Sulu - agree, many typos and spec errors in the Canadian spec sheet like the DirectShift CVT (only for the 200), turning circle, HUD and Nav missing in the F Sport S2, interior specs, etc. I pointed those out to my dealer a couple weeks ago who in turn submitted it to Corp. Let's see.
For the UX, the 250h is the way to go. If you can accept a drop of 4 cu ft in cargo, it's only a 2K premium for a torquier powertrain, lowered NVH, and eAWD.
2. The DirectShift CVT (physical 1st gear) is only with the 2L non-hybrid per the Japan specs and European reviews where they state the 2L Hybrid has the more conventional "eCVT". Did you notice any difference when driving both cars? Did you engage the paddle shifters?
@Sulu - agree, many typos and spec errors in the Canadian spec sheet like the DirectShift CVT (only for the 200), turning circle, HUD and Nav missing in the F Sport S2, interior specs, etc. I pointed those out to my dealer a couple weeks ago who in turn submitted it to Corp. Let's see.
For the UX, the 250h is the way to go. If you can accept a drop of 4 cu ft in cargo, it's only a 2K premium for a torquier powertrain, lowered NVH, and eAWD.
2. It feels smoother from a stop with the new transmission. The paddle shifters are quick but only available on F-Sport models.
Thanks for the information. I am only interested in the Hybrid model (no more normal cars for me if I can help it). I am not concerned about it lacking power.
It seems to me that the reviewer was too obsessed about the UX being under-powered; from first hearing that the engine would not be turbocharged (while its competitors would be), he seemed to want to do everything possible to confirm that the car indeed is under-powered.
It seems to me that the reviewer was too obsessed about the UX being under-powered; from first hearing that the engine would not be turbocharged (while its competitors would be), he seemed to want to do everything possible to confirm that the car indeed is under-powered.
#25
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,044
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes
on
42 Posts
Correct, the X1 does not have BSM which is a huge drawback. But it does have a lot of other premium features like rain sensing wipers, auto fold mirrors, ambient lighting. I need a small practical SUV as Im trying to downsize from the RX. Looking at the UX trunk space pretty much rules it out.
#26
Correct, the X1 does not have BSM which is a huge drawback. But it does have a lot of other premium features like rain sensing wipers, auto fold mirrors, ambient lighting. I need a small practical SUV as Im trying to downsize from the RX. Looking at the UX trunk space pretty much rules it out.
#27
Lexus Champion
Correct, the X1 does not have BSM which is a huge drawback. But it does have a lot of other premium features like rain sensing wipers, auto fold mirrors, ambient lighting. I need a small practical SUV as Im trying to downsize from the RX. Looking at the UX trunk space pretty much rules it out.
#28
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,044
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes
on
42 Posts
Yeah, kind of looking to stay with the luxury name plates. The Volvo/Q3/Epace do not look as good to me as the X1 exterior. A two or three year bmw is also very enticing with the zero maintenance costs.
#29
The one I looked under the floor was a UX 200. In about 3-4 weeks I will be able to compare the two side by side and take pictures for you. In the meantime my apologies.
I guess 'no problem' as in it didn't cause me a hassle to write this? Lol I dunno, It's just a term I've used for years and I think others also have on this forum.
I guess 'no problem' as in it didn't cause me a hassle to write this? Lol I dunno, It's just a term I've used for years and I think others also have on this forum.
#30
Lexus Test Driver
What technology is giving it higher city mpg's than highway? I think this is a first or very rare for any hybrid.