Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Audi announces new two-digit naming system (update on page 3)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-17, 03:25 PM
  #1  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default Audi announces new two-digit naming system (update on page 3)



Once upon a time, model numbers indicated a car's engine displacement. A BMW 328i had a 2.8-liter engine, a Mercedes S500 had a 5.0-liter V8, etc. Then engine downsizing happened. Since a new carcouldn't have a lower and thus seemingly inferior number than its predecessor, we ended up with model numbers that represented nothing but an incremental trip up the heirarchy. Perhaps it makes no difference to consumers, but Audi has announced that it's going to bring order to chaos with a new name/badging system for the 2018 model year.

Here's how it works. Current model names (A4, Q5, etc.) will remain the same, but their engine designations (2.0T, 3.0T, etc) will switch to a two-digit number that represents the car's horsepower (or kilowatts as Audi used in the announcement) regardless of whether it runs on gasoline, diesel, electricity or a combination of fuels.

The numbering starts at 30, which Audi explains represents engines making 110 to 131 horsepower. The other example Audi gives is 45, which represents cars making 230 to 252 hp. At the top of the range is 70, which is for cars that make over 544 hp. As an example, our 252-horsepower Audi A4 Allroad long-term car would have a 45 appended to its hatch-mounted "allroad" badge along with TFSI to denote that it's powered by gasoline.

It's not a consistent system, though. The range of power covered by each number isn't consistent, and there are some gaps, as shown by Autocar's complete breakdown of the numbering scheme using British brake horsepower. For instance, the 40 range covers cars between 170 and 203 of our horsepower, a difference of about 30 hp compared with a difference of about 20 hp for the 45 range. This also means that there isn't a new number for cars making between 204 and 229 hp. Even though Audi may not currently have engines in the gap zones, it seems like expanding each group to fill the gaps would be a useful way to future-proof the system for new engines.

Despite this, we appreciate Audi's attempt to bring meaning to badging again. There's also another good reason for the system. It provides a unified way of ranking powertrains instead of displacement, which isn't necessarily accurate at conveying performance between gas and diesel engines, and is irrelevant for electric and electrified powertrains.

As Dr. Dietmar Voggenreiter, board of management member for sales and marketing at AUDI AG, puts it, "As alternative drive technologies become increasingly relevant, engine displacement as a performance attribute is becoming less important to our customers. The clarity and logic of structuring the designations according to power output makes it possible to distinguish between the various performance levels."

However, before you start memorizing future names and numbers, there's a chance they won't even be making it to the United States. While an Audi representative in Germany told us that the new naming strategy was global and that it would indeed be coming here, a representative in the United States indicated that it had not been confirmed. Such confusion is not unusual, however, and we expect a definitive answer in the near future as corporate wires become uncrossed.
Source
Hoovey689 is online now  
Old 08-23-17, 03:34 PM
  #2  
grabber2
Racer
 
grabber2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 1,361
Received 46 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

I believe they already did that in China few years ago......I keep seeing Audi A6/A8 with 45 TFSI. I thought those were V8....lol
grabber2 is offline  
Old 08-23-17, 03:35 PM
  #3  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

yay more confusion.
GSteg is offline  
Old 08-23-17, 03:53 PM
  #4  
jwong77
Pole Position
 
jwong77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 2,298
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Uhhh.... if you need to refer to a chart, its probably too confusing.
jwong77 is offline  
Old 08-23-17, 04:46 PM
  #5  
yardie876
Lexus Champion
 
yardie876's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SoFlo
Posts: 3,438
Received 87 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

......................what? This is the most confusing pile of poo I’ve ever seen lol.
yardie876 is offline  
Old 08-23-17, 05:17 PM
  #6  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,606
Received 2,520 Likes on 1,818 Posts
Default

Don't these guys have more to worry about than coming up with more strange naming conventions?!?!
SW17LS is offline  
Old 08-23-17, 05:28 PM
  #7  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW15LS
Don't these guys have more to worry about than coming up with more strange naming conventions?!?!
Welcome to the world of auto-marketing. Always was, and always will be, the anthesis of common sense.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 08-23-17, 06:47 PM
  #8  
GiantsFan
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
GiantsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CA - Norcal
Posts: 7,550
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

This actually makes sense... Kinda
GiantsFan is offline  
Old 08-23-17, 07:27 PM
  #9  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

It is still rather arbitrary, it seems; there is no consistent multiplication constant to tell you what power rating (hp or kW) corresponds to a model designation. And, if the current lowest model designation is "30" (for models with between 81 and 96kW (107 and 127bhp)), does that mean there will (or may) be a "20" or "25" model in the future with less than 100hp?

How about these model designations instead?
"75" for 75 kW to 100 kW (100hp to 134hp)
"100" for 100 kW to 125 kW
"125" for 125 kW to 150 kW
Sulu is offline  
Old 08-23-17, 08:13 PM
  #10  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GiantsFan
This actually makes sense... Kinda
Actually, they're playing numbers-games with the figures to try and disguise the fact that engines are being downsized.

We also saw that, back in the late 1970s and early-80s, when Detroit was downsizing their cars...except with names instead of number/letter combos. A company would take a name of a former full-size car like (Pontiac) "Bonneville" or (Plymouth) "Fury" and transfer the name to its existing mid-size car. Thus, the former full-size Bonneville and Fury because a new mid-size vehicle with the same name. The old full-size Bonneville was re-named the Pontiac Parisienne, and the old full-size Plymouth Fury the Grand Fury (and Dodge Grand Monaco). Another example was with the Ford LTD/LTD II.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 08-23-17, 08:53 PM
  #11  
geko29
Super Moderator

 
geko29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 7,466
Received 210 Likes on 160 Posts
Default

Dumb, dumb, dumb. Audi currently has the most transparent badging of all the German makes. With nearly all of their engines now sporting forced induction, displacement has once again become a valid frame of reference, vs the old days when the 3.0T made WAY more power than the 3.2/3.6 it replaced. I also don't believe they've ever offered more than one diesel within a model in the US, and there's zero chance of that ever happening post-dieselgate. So there's no issue just calling those TDI.

S555TFSI just rolls right off the tongue, doesn't it?
geko29 is offline  
Old 08-23-17, 09:33 PM
  #12  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,678
Received 156 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

This is totally unneeded. It also goes to show how competitive this industry is. It is so competitive, even BAD IDEAS are getting copied. Yeah, it used to be just good ideas were copied. Now everyone does everything someone else has done even if it's a bad idea. Audi is the only brand left where everyone knows an A4, A5, A6, etc. Adding confusion is just going to hurt sales when potential customers can't figure it out at first blush. Hopefully this doesn't make it to the U.S.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 08-23-17, 09:36 PM
  #13  
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
 
Aron9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 4,592
Received 28 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Best thing I can say is at least they aren't throwing the baby out with the bath water, we still have A4, A6, A8, S4, S6, S8, RS4, RS6 RS8, Q3, Q5, Q7, its easy to identify which model you are talking about at least.

Could be much worse like at Infiniti, everything is now Q or QX with the number indicating the size of the vehicle, stupid, stupid, stupid idea IMO. Especially when you already have a lot of name recognition with things like G35, G37(sporty sedan/coupe), QX56(huge SUV), FX(sporty SUV). Or Cadillac, finally when people get used to CTS, ATS, SRX, you have to change **** up for no reason. Personally I miss the days of Deville, Seville and Eldorado, nothing wrong with making luxo-barges if they drove nice, looked contemporary, were well made, and reliable over the long haul(hello Lexus)
Aron9000 is offline  
Old 08-24-17, 12:28 AM
  #14  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aron9000
Best thing I can say is at least they aren't throwing the baby out with the bath water, we still have A4, A6, A8, S4, S6, S8, RS4, RS6 RS8, Q3, Q5, Q7, its easy to identify which model you are talking about at least.

Could be much worse like at Infiniti, everything is now Q or QX with the number indicating the size of the vehicle, stupid, stupid, stupid idea IMO. Especially when you already have a lot of name recognition with things like G35, G37(sporty sedan/coupe), QX56(huge SUV), FX(sporty SUV). Or Cadillac, finally when people get used to CTS, ATS, SRX, you have to change **** up for no reason. Personally I miss the days of Deville, Seville and Eldorado, nothing wrong with making luxo-barges if they drove nice, looked contemporary, were well made, and reliable over the long haul(hello Lexus)
funny, all three automakers you mention have had Johan de Nysschen at the helm in some form or another. Man really knows how to leave a mark
Hoovey689 is online now  
Old 08-24-17, 04:58 AM
  #15  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,762
Received 2,126 Likes on 1,378 Posts
Default

It's not perfect but rating on power and not displacement makes sense. With electrics, diesels, gas, hybrids, turbos, etc., reg engine size and cylinders are now meaningless.
bitkahuna is offline  


Quick Reply: Audi announces new two-digit naming system (update on page 3)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:09 PM.