Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2019 Toyota Supra

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-19, 07:08 PM
  #1021  
Stroock639
Lead Lap
 
Stroock639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,828
Received 231 Likes on 175 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
Is that so? I swear I thought they were identical except for the sleeper badge. Why wouldn't all of the turbos not be labeled as such?

I'm indifferent about the wing, looks good either way.
idk i think it might've been an option to check off or something, but not all turbos had the turbo badge

edit: it became standard in 1997


as an aside, i think this explains what's fundamentally wrong with the zupra and why it shouldn't be called supra

https://web.archive.org/web/19970606...pc03lFb4t-1v@@

notice what's the first item toyota lists for explaining why the supra is so good

Last edited by Stroock639; 05-14-19 at 07:26 PM.
Stroock639 is offline  
Old 05-14-19, 07:12 PM
  #1022  
Stroock639
Lead Lap
 
Stroock639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,828
Received 231 Likes on 175 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by plex
Chances of running into a bone stock MKIV is slim to none these days ha ha, all the bone stock ones are now collector/garage queen status. Full torque comes in at 15/1600 rpms on the MKV that's very impressive meaning a good power range but it's 11:1 compression so expected. I would love to see a rwhp dyno on a bone stock MKV, no way it's 335 crank which is around 255 at wheels.
oh yea it'll never actually happen lol but if it did and they both got a start from at least 50 or so the result would be nearly identical, even stock the mk iv is properly fast... i think as time goes by and every supra is A THOUSAND HORSEPOWER TEN MILLION PSI BRO these days people forget how quick it was from the factory
Stroock639 is offline  
Old 05-14-19, 07:42 PM
  #1023  
G Star
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
G Star's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: California
Posts: 6,972
Received 47 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
LS and LC had mostly negative responses, because they are both half assed efforts by half assed company.

Interesting comment. LC is Lexus' best example since the LFA. It gets positive remarks on looks, performance and quality from across the spectrum. The only thing that is commonly disliked about it is the infotainment.

Your bias is really showing here, try to contain it a little more, unless you just want others to not take you seriously. In that case, go nuts.
G Star is offline  
Old 05-14-19, 07:57 PM
  #1024  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by G Star
Interesting comment. LC is Lexus' best example since the LFA. It gets positive remarks on looks, performance and quality from across the spectrum. The only thing that is commonly disliked about it is the infotainment.

Your bias is really showing here, try to contain it a little more, unless you just want others to not take you seriously. In that case, go nuts.
Looks are fine, everything else about it completely half assed. Never mind the infotainment, it's using a drivetrain that is over a decade old and utterly disappointing compared to the competition.
Och is offline  
Old 05-14-19, 08:35 PM
  #1025  
evident
Racer
 
evident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 1,381
Received 76 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
it's using a drivetrain that is over a decade old and utterly disappointing compared to the competition.
You can say that about every Lexus vehicle in the fleet except the new LS. its not limited to the LC. and the 4cyl turbo just sucks.
evident is offline  
Old 05-14-19, 08:46 PM
  #1026  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by evident
You can say that about every Lexus vehicle in the fleet except the new LS. its not limited to the LC. and the 4cyl turbo just sucks.
The LS is arguably the most disappointing, competition's flagships had TT V8s for almost a decade now. The new Supra on the other hand is awesome on every level.
Och is offline  
Old 05-15-19, 03:09 AM
  #1027  
KahnBB6
Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
KahnBB6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: FL & CA
Posts: 7,195
Received 1,221 Likes on 856 Posts
Default

I saw that C&D article earlier yesterday. I knew my earlier suspicion that it was an underrated engine (just like the 2JZGTE) was right. I wouldn't be surprised if it's more like 335whp rather than 335hp at the crank. A dyno will easily tell us the true figure. No way even with a ZF8 and near maximum torque from 1600rpm is a 3400lb 335hp(crank) car doing 0-60 in 4.1. And now its down to 3.8 seconds

On the Supra MKV forums it's been noted that this version of the B58 in the USA did not receive a particulate filter which may be partly contributing to the power output well beyond the official figure Toyota wants to stick to.

Also the Supra's B58 cylinder head (with an integrated exhaust manifold) is apparently not a hindrance to making more power into the 700hp range in testing nor was it really that much help in reducing emissions over a traditional head. Probably the limit ceiling goes even higher if the later GRMN switches to the cylinder head with the traditional exhaust ports and a separate manifold for a different turbo setup.

It still needs a manual though even if the 0-60 will be slightly slower... because who cares when you've got a six or seven speed lever in your hand. Tada-san did address a question about that at the recent launch event saying through his translator that several BMW manuals were evaluated but he didn't consider them up to his standard for this car. There was the hint of another manual avenue being pursued but of course he would not confirm anything or be more specific.

But think about that. It's easy enough to look up the manual transmissions used in the current (or last gen) M3's and M4's and the M2/Competition. And Tetsuya Tada still felt an even stronger manual gearbox would be needed and that such an additional avenue was being looked into or in his wording, "considered". It confirms nothing and gives absolutely nothing for concrete info but that's the way the chief engineer was talking about it after being bombarded with feedback over the lack of a manual option for Toyota's most famous sports car.

...which just had its official manufacturer claimed 0-60 time (with Launch Mode enabled) improved on by .3 seconds in an independent test with the ZF8.

As far as the LC500, I personally love that car. It's kind of the closest we've had since 2000 to a spiritual Z30 SC successor in a kind of ultimate guise for what the car mostly was in a personal luxury GT coupe. It's beautiful, fast and oozes style.

But the MKV is a totally different level of car. An actual sports car with room to grow well beyond what it can do stock.

Last edited by KahnBB6; 05-15-19 at 03:19 AM.
KahnBB6 is offline  
Old 05-15-19, 04:35 AM
  #1028  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,033
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
Looks are fine, everything else about it completely half assed. Never mind the infotainment, it's using a drivetrain that is over a decade old and utterly disappointing compared to the competition.
didnt know lexus had a 470 hp 5.0 V8 10 speed drivetrain 10 years ago. Fascinating
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 05-15-19, 04:51 AM
  #1029  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,033
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stroock639
well that's just one video i chose out of others i've seen, would drag radials actually account for a full second difference? and either way all they do is allow the car to reach it's potential, also a car only needs to go 10.999 once and it's technically now a 10 second car forever however atypical it may be

can we just agree that the C6 Z06 is very fast lol... i'm starting to think maybe you lost to one in your viper haha
yes drag radials make that much of a difference (.5 to 1 sec) and that track looked prepped track as well, another factor, in addition to the mid 30 degF ambient temperatures. People point out a multitude of factors in that videos comments. When the C7 Z06 is barely a 10 sec car (10.95 official spec) it was obvious a much lower powered last gen version also doing 10s is far fetched
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 05-15-19, 04:58 AM
  #1030  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,033
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

this car has to be significantly underrated, C&D just hit a 3.8 sec 0-60 in the supra, official spec is 4.1. That is definately not a 335 hp car. While not scientific using a simple 0-60 calculator, to hit a 4.1 0-60 in a 3300# RWD automatic car, the engine would have to have 435 hp. It has launch control but C&D said its launch control sucks and they were much faster without it

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a2...on-zero-to-60/

Last edited by 4TehNguyen; 05-15-19 at 05:03 AM.
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 05-15-19, 06:03 AM
  #1031  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,069
Received 62 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

BMW has underrated their cars for years.
My E92 335i was rated at 300hp lol - Those N54 cars dynoed well over that.
Just look at the current M5 as prime example.

The Z4 will still be FASTER because it has the more powerful engine which will be coming to the Supra shortly.

This is not Toyota’s achievement- its all BMW engineering licensed out under Supra badge.
RNM GS3 is online now  
Old 05-15-19, 06:51 AM
  #1032  
coolsaber
Lead Lap
 
coolsaber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: In your head
Posts: 4,086
Received 275 Likes on 246 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
There is NO WAY that BMW will put an ///M engine into a Toyota. They already said that there will be no Z4M so the new S58 engine will not go into any Supra.
The reason that Supra got the neutered B58 is for BMW to have the higher HP version.
This detuned version may be just “paper specs.” I would not be surprised that if you dyno the Z4 and Supra - they will be making identical #s.

B58 is easy to tune like most BMW turbos but to push out over 700hp - there will need to be other parts to upgrade in order to make it work. Plus any tune will void your warranty.
I’m sure the ECU tunes will be out there soon and u can easily make 50-100hp very safely.
B58 is probably more forthcoming to tune then anything Toyota has launched with their locked down ECUs, however in the tuner spectrum, its no tuners dream like say the N54/55 motors before it. For STOCK, this is better then those two powerplants, and hence why Toyota went with it. Yet to hear about the ECUs that toyota is running. Yes, have seen the stamping everywhere but we shall see what modules are stock BMW, and not. If they kept the modules like BMW, then even better for tuners since you just bandwagon with BMW tuners, if otherwise....day 1.

Magna Steyr mfg worries me a tid bit (remember the E83 X3 was made there), but its Toyota they wont let them do anything.

Fun fact, like RNM has said, BMW always underrates their motors, to overimpress their reviewers and of course the general public.
coolsaber is offline  
Old 05-15-19, 07:23 AM
  #1033  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,332
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,021 Posts
Default

More from C&D, comparing the new and the old:

In its day, the Mark IV Supra was quick as hell. The manual-equipped Turbo model that we tested in 1993 hit 60 mph in 4.6 seconds and went through the quarter-mile in 13.1 seconds at 109 mph. In a 1993 six-car comparison test, which it won, we described the Supra Turbo as "a rocket car" that pulled like a train. The 2020 Supra destroys the old car, though, with a 3.8-second zero-to-60-mph time and a quarter-mile dispatched in 12.3 seconds at 113 mph. The A80's 11.1-second zero-to-100-mph and 19.9-second zero-to-130 runs were similarly beaten; the new car posted times of 9.5 seconds to 100 mph and 17.4 seconds to 130.

The new Supra is also way quicker in passing, but that's to be expected given the transmission differences. The A90's 5-to-60-mph rolling start time of 4.6 seconds is 1.3 seconds quicker than the A80's, but the real improvement comes in the 30-to-50 and 50-to-70 acceleration runs, which are done in top gear. At 2.5 seconds from 30 to 50 mph and 2.8 seconds from 50 to 70 mph, the new Supra crushes the old car, which recorded times of 13.1 seconds and 8.1 seconds, respectively, in the same tests.

There is one category where the Mark IV should have the new car beat: top speed. Toyota says the new Supra is limited to 155 mph, while the 1993 car was able to hit 160 mph in our hands. But in our testing, the new car exceeded the limiter, still pulling past the 160 mark. We estimate its real top speed to be around 162 mph.

Grip has greatly improved, too. The A80 Turbo had 17-inch wheels wrapped in Bridgestone Potenza RE020 tires, sized 235/45 in front and 255/40 in the rear, while the A90 uses 19-inch wheels with Michelin Pilot Super Sport tires, sized 255/35 in front and 275/35 in back. On our skidpad, the old car pulled 0.95 g, which was in the realm of (or better than) many higher-end sports cars at the time. But in the new car we recorded an excellent 1.07 g, nearly matching a Porsche 911 GT3.

The new Supra also has bigger brakes, using 13.7-inch vented discs in front and 13.6-inch vented discs in the rear, 1.0 inch and 0.8 inch larger than the old car (which also had vented discs). With a 160-foot stopping distance from 70 mph, the 1993 Supra would still be respectable today. But the 2020 Supra stopped in 148 feet, again putting it in the league of more hard-core modern machinery.

So that's how the two Supras compare on paper, at least in numbers. Sure, it might not be surprising that the new one is better in basically every measurable way—but it kind of had to be, right? Supra fans aren't exactly tame and easy to please.

There are two obvious ways the fourth-gen car is better in our eyes, though: It had that massive optional wing and an optional targa roof. The new Supra doesn't have either of those things. So we guess it's a tie, then.
More here.
JDR76 is online now  
Old 05-15-19, 09:16 AM
  #1034  
jadu
live.love.laugh.lexus

iTrader: (42)
 
jadu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CALI
Posts: 11,581
Received 89 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
BMW has underrated their cars for years.
My E92 335i was rated at 300hp lol - Those N54 cars dynoed well over that.
Just look at the current M5 as prime example.

The Z4 will still be FASTER because it has the more powerful engine which will be coming to the Supra shortly.

This is not Toyota’s achievement- its all BMW engineering licensed out under Supra badge.
just to add, as you may already know, licensing happens all the time with electronics. Apple and Samsung license Qualcomm Snapdragon cellular modems; without it no 4G LTE nor 5G connectivity. Android is licensed in all the products running it. Dell, IBM, HP, Alienware all have name brand OEM internals e.g. AMD, Nvidia, Intel, Samsung etc..
jadu is offline  
Old 05-15-19, 09:59 AM
  #1035  
sorptd
Intermediate
 
sorptd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: NJ
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow ! 3.8 sec 0 to 60 on a stock car is excellent. Supra also seems to be getting great reviews for handling, ride quality and overall tuning of the car.
sorptd is offline  


Quick Reply: 2019 Toyota Supra



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:27 AM.