Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Is Lexus Becoming The Next Acura?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-17, 04:29 PM
  #151  
Rhambler
Lexus Test Driver
 
Rhambler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 1,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Makes you wonder if the new LS will become the old RL. An obscure flagship.

The new RL barely registers in sales. It's a v6 hybrid with two electric motors driving the rear wheels for $60-$70k and 377 hp I think and no one buys them, at all. It does 0-60 as quick or quicker than the current LS and finally became slightly larger at 196 inches but they don't sell at all.

People complain that the RL is overpriced, I wonder how people will feel when a $90k V6 LS comes rolling through.
Rhambler is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 04:42 PM
  #152  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,584
Received 2,519 Likes on 1,817 Posts
Default

I highly doubt that lol. The LS is very well respected, very established, very high customer retention rates. It's going to be just fine.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 04:52 PM
  #153  
Rhambler
Lexus Test Driver
 
Rhambler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 1,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Well I say that purely from a price perspective.

Heck I think the RL hybrid, when it first came out a few years ago, based at $70k. They REALLY didn't sell. They dropped the price to $60k base, but I think it's too little and too late.

If they price it at $90k base (which many people believe, while I think that's ludicrous) I'll be the first to say that it will probably volume like the RL.
Rhambler is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 05:33 PM
  #154  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,584
Received 2,519 Likes on 1,817 Posts
Default

Even if they start at $90k, the LS brand strength will be enough it will do fine. I won't be a buyer, but there will be buyers.

Plenty of buyers out there that are LS loyalists that don't care about a V8. Even if it had a V8 I still wouldn't be a buyer at $90k+.

If they can sell people a 4cyl only E Class for $70k lol. Also bear in mind people are buying $66k 4cyl Inscription Volvo S90s. Volvos brand is nowhere near as strong as Lexus.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 05:36 PM
  #155  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,572
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rhambler
Makes you wonder if the new LS will become the old RL. An obscure flagship.

The new RL barely registers in sales. It's a v6 hybrid with two electric motors driving the rear wheels for $60-$70k and 377 hp I think and no one buys them, at all. It does 0-60 as quick or quicker than the current LS and finally became slightly larger at 196 inches but they don't sell at all.

People complain that the RL is overpriced, I wonder how people will feel when a $90k V6 LS comes rolling through.

Just a technicality, Rhambler, but the RL's designation changed to RLX several years ago, with the 3rd-generation redesign. And it now comes in two versions.....the Hybrid SH-AWD you reference, and a FWD version with all-wheel-steering.

http://www.acura.com/RLX
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 05:42 PM
  #156  
Rhambler
Lexus Test Driver
 
Rhambler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 1,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Actually the RL or RLX does 0-60 is 5 seconds according to C&D.

They thought that offering this Hybrid as a V8 alternative with actually great gas mileage would make it desirable for a "flagship" sans the V8.

I remember reading the press releases as I still had my RL and they touted the speed of this hybrid as a true V8 alternative and they priced it just slightly lower than the LS I think back in 2014, thinking it could compete. I think it originally based at $67k.

Well that hat worked out well.
Rhambler is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 05:48 PM
  #157  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,584
Received 2,519 Likes on 1,817 Posts
Default

But comparing the RLX to the LS is more than a little bit unfair. You're hyper focused on the engine but in reality that's a small piece of an overall package. All one has to do to see the ways the RLX doesn't measure up with the LS is to sit in one, driving one brings up many more ways...and that's the current LS.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 05:56 PM
  #158  
Rhambler
Lexus Test Driver
 
Rhambler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 1,302
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Well it did actually grow in size. That is one thing I remember noting. Yeah it's still 4 or 5 inches shorter than the LS 460 SWB, but at least it shed its Accord stature.

If you ever see one, park next to it. It's not as big, but nig nonetheless but yeah it is still a tweaner.

And the reason why I brought the engine up is because many of us in the RL community bemoaned the fact the RL didn't offer a V8 and that's why, above anything else, it will play second fiddle to the other flagships.

Well instead of a V8, they gave us this Hybrid that, according to them, performed as well as a V8 but with better gas mileage. Many of us fled and the RLs, by all accounts, sells extremely poorly.

Am I trying to draw a parallel here? Well kind of, history repeats itself a lot. But The bottom line, the bigger lesson is that Acura should not have tried to price it like a V8. Sound familiar?

They already rolled back the price because no one bought it, but the damage was done.

Last edited by Rhambler; 02-21-17 at 06:00 PM.
Rhambler is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 05:59 PM
  #159  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,584
Received 2,519 Likes on 1,817 Posts
Default

I don't have to look for one, I've driven it. It's just not at all in the LS' league. It's not a function of size.

The fact that it doesn't have a V8 is the least of its problems.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 06:10 PM
  #160  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,572
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW15LS
I don't have to look for one, I've driven it. It's just not at all in the LS' league. It's not a function of size.
It's better than a lot of people give it credit for, but I agree it's not an LS. The last-generation RL was built like a tank, but did not appeal to many because of its Accord-styling.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 06:20 PM
  #161  
Rezno
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Rezno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: OR
Posts: 465
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BoDarville
i picked 5 - 60 mph times from major automotive publications (C&D and MT) to be fair to the is350 since this is closer to realistic on-the-road acceleration and somewhat removes awd advantage from the equation; 0 - 60 times from those same publications puts everyone of the cars listed further ahead of the is350, including the 328i.

i love how you picked the "some people" acceleration times to prove your unsupported claim. laughable.
Except drag races and stoplight races don't start from 5 MPH. Most rolling races don't start from 5 MPH either. (And yes, I know an IS350 would lose the majority of rolling races. Mostly due to gearing) When people talk acceleration, it is always 0-60 and 1/4 mile times. And if your goal was realistic times, a bad run for a 2IS is a 5.5 - 5.8 second 0-60 and nowhere near a 6.2 second. Also, and I can't believe I didn't say this earlier, but you're comparing cars almost from a different generation. The Jaguar was announced in 2014, produced in 2015, and sold in the US in 2016. The Cadillac began production in 2013, the specific A4 engine that you're talking about in the 2017 model year (tuned to 252HP, previous ones were less), the Volvo in 2011, and the 328i in 2012. The difference between the Cadillac, your second choice and the IS is 0.4 seconds. Funny how it took 5 years or more for companies to compete with an 'inefficient overrated' engine from 2006 if we're playing this by your words. All your comparisons are relatively new cars compared to a 2006/07 IS350 with a 2005 designed drivetrain. The only thing laughable is your failed attempt to twist numbers in your favor. Try again.

And please show me any proof of a 328i 0-60 being faster than an IS350. 'unsupported claim' 'laughable'

Unsupported claim, lol.

(4.6)
(4.7)
(4.5)
(Closer to 4.5 or 4.6)

And, because YT isn't the most reliable source
http://www.zeroto60times.com/vehicle...-60-mph-times/ (4.8)

Those times are hard to replicate and not typical, definitely, but it shows that the car is CAPABLE of them under optimal conditions. Know the difference, and please study your own numbers before you call me out on mine.

Last edited by Rezno; 02-25-17 at 05:58 PM.
Rezno is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 06:22 PM
  #162  
Rezno
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Rezno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: OR
Posts: 465
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by evident
I believe the RX, GS and maybe ES? are using the same engines now as the sienna, highlander and tacoma. with that said, i think it's a stopgap until the TT V6 trickles down from the LS to the rest of the lineup.
No way is Lexus becoming Acura. I consider myself a big Honda fan but I hate how Acura has flat out stunk since 2008. They are quickly becoming like Mercury because even Lincolns are getting more interesting than Acuras now.
Correct. The RX and ES both use the 2GR FE engine, shared with various V6 Toyota cars due to the FWD platform its on. Also, the LX570 and Land Cruiser also share an engine. I am uncertain about anything else. Soon enough that TTV6 will make its way down and it will be exciting to see what they will do with it.
Rezno is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 06:52 PM
  #163  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,331
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,021 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rezno
Correct. The RX and ES both use the 2GR FE engine, shared with various V6 Toyota cars due to the FWD platform its on. Also, the LX570 and Land Cruiser also share an engine. I am uncertain about anything else. Soon enough that TTV6 will make its way down and it will be exciting to see what they will do with it.
The RX uses the 2GR-FKS, same as the GS, Highlander, Sienna, and Tacoma.
JDR76 is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 07:04 PM
  #164  
MattyG
Lexus Champion
 
MattyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: RightHere
Posts: 2,300
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Back in the prehistoric dinosaur age when Japanese manufacturers decided they wanted to take on the Germans, Acura was an up and coming brand and it thrived. So did Lexus and eventually Infiniti.

Acura>>Audi competitor
Infiniti>>BMW competitor
Lexus>>Mercedes Benz rival

What happened? Acura stuck to transverse FWD cars and eventually just decided to cash in on the crossover craze. By the time the revamped RL offered AWD in 05 it was too late. Audi had already been doing that and offered the single frame grill to create excitement and a new image.

Essentially Acura is a crossover company for people who don't want a Honda Pilot/Accord etc. (NSX excluded).

Where does this leave Lexus? Well I don't think Lexus is the same as Acura because Lexus kept at it with the LS, GS and of course the IS over all these years. This new LS and its reviews and pricing are going to be critical to its success. Acura's beak and weirdo styling was just the final chapter on its sedans. Now we'll see if consumers embrace the LS and its styling.
MattyG is offline  
Old 02-21-17, 07:40 PM
  #165  
Rezno
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Rezno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: OR
Posts: 465
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
The RX uses the 2GR-FKS, same as the GS, Highlander, Sienna, and Tacoma.
The newest generation ones use the FKS, previous RX models used the 3.5 2GR FE.
Rezno is offline  


Quick Reply: Is Lexus Becoming The Next Acura?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:59 AM.