Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Official: Alfa Romeo Giulia

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 03:57 AM
  #31  
Mr Bond's Avatar
Mr Bond
Pole Position
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: europe
Default

Looks good, but I did as an old Alfa enthusiast expected a little bit more extreme design on the exterior. I have seen this design before and the front looks more like an evolution of the Alfa147 than a new era.

But the thing with Alfa is not the looks of it. Its the feeling when you drive it
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 04:29 AM
  #32  
zema's Avatar
zema
Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Nice sound

Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 04:42 AM
  #33  
TangoRed's Avatar
TangoRed
Thread Starter
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 24
From: Washington
Default

Originally Posted by NickTee
Interior looks kind of cheap, like they grabbed parts from an American car's scrap pile, but the specs sound good. Definitely not on the same level as BMW or Mercedes quality-wise. Slapping carbon fiber everywhere doesn't make it nice.
Wow! Please tell me how you were able to assess the quality of the interior through these pictures. I didn't know you were able to touch materials through your monitor. I'm also going to point out the BMW 3-series has been regularly criticized for the quality of its interior, so not sure where you were going with that anyways.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 05:47 AM
  #34  
zema's Avatar
zema
Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default



Source: Autovisie.nl
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 02:41 PM
  #35  
NickTee's Avatar
NickTee
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 15
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by TangoRed
Wow! Please tell me how you were able to assess the quality of the interior through these pictures. I didn't know you were able to touch materials through your monitor. I'm also going to point out the BMW 3-series has been regularly criticized for the quality of its interior, so not sure where you were going with that anyways.
Someone's mad.

Thank you for pointing it out, because I didn't realize the 3-series, one of the cheapest BMWs you can buy, embodied both Mercedes and BMW's quality. Way to go there, Target. Right on point.

The steering wheel controls and light controls look like something pulled off of a Malibu, or some other American car, the HVAC controls are all very basic and cheap-looking, etc. It's like looking at a lower-end 2012 C300 with carbon fiber everywhere and calling it a C63 AMG. *Chuckle*

Last edited by NickTee; Jun 25, 2015 at 02:45 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 04:06 PM
  #36  
cino's Avatar
cino
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by NickTee
Someone's mad.

Thank you for pointing it out, because I didn't realize the 3-series, one of the cheapest BMWs you can buy, embodied both Mercedes and BMW's quality. Way to go there, Target. Right on point.

The steering wheel controls and light controls look like something pulled off of a Malibu, or some other American car, the HVAC controls are all very basic and cheap-looking, etc. It's like looking at a lower-end 2012 C300 with carbon fiber everywhere and calling it a C63 AMG. *Chuckle*
C-class interior looks better than 3's, but it doesn't feel any more superior IMO. I personally like the interior design of Guilia better, and that carbon fiber dash is eye candy. Steering wheel looks like something from German concept cars and that push start button on steering wheel is a clever implementation (not ideal, but clever). They could have gone with digital speedo, but traditional isn't half bad really. Big plus is, Guilia doesn't have a tablet sitting on the dash.

I guarantee you will be underwhelmed by C-class interior just as 3s. They are called "entry" luxury for a reason.

EDIT: You could go further to compare a mid-engine BMW or Mercedes to Alfa Romeo 4C, oh wait.
Alfa is a niche brand with Ferrari heritage under its belt. Why do we even compare it to a mainstream luxu.

Last edited by cino; Jun 25, 2015 at 04:11 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 04:43 PM
  #37  
I8ABMR's Avatar
I8ABMR
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 22,608
Likes: 105
From: Waiting for next track day
Default

stunning. No way in hell I would even lease one when they came out though. SAD
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 05:15 PM
  #38  
TangoRed's Avatar
TangoRed
Thread Starter
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 24
From: Washington
Default

Originally Posted by NickTee
Someone's mad.

Thank you for pointing it out, because I didn't realize the 3-series, one of the cheapest BMWs you can buy, embodied both Mercedes and BMW's quality. Way to go there, Target. Right on point.

The steering wheel controls and light controls look like something pulled off of a Malibu, or some other American car, the HVAC controls are all very basic and cheap-looking, etc. It's like looking at a lower-end 2012 C300 with carbon fiber everywhere and calling it a C63 AMG. *Chuckle*
Whelp, seeing as how the Giulia is a direct competitor to the 3-series it was a very valid comparison. So yes, right on point. I'm also really not getting your C300 vs. C63 comparison...the switchgear is the exact same. If you look at a 2012 C300, the same year C63 AMG is literally the same damn thing with more carbon fiber and better seats.

And again, to revisit your first post, you merely looking and forming an opinion on quality is laughable. I'm not going to debate your opinion, but you have no idea about the actual quality of the interior materials. They very well may suck, but no one has been in it yet to find out.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 05:56 PM
  #39  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20,237
Likes: 274
Default

Originally Posted by cino

EDIT: You could go further to compare a mid-engine BMW or Mercedes to Alfa Romeo 4C, oh wait.
Alfa is a niche brand with Ferrari heritage under its belt. Why do we even compare it to a mainstream luxu.
I can understand that Alfa was not available in the USA for a long time... but Alfa has been around Europe forever.

Reason people do not trust FCA when it comes to Alfa is because in reality Alfa has had nothing to do with Ferrari or Maserati for past 30 years... it was Fiat's sporty wannabe premium brand that has failed to deliver with every single model they have produced since I remember.

It always starts great and ends horrible... thats a life of Alfista. When Giulietta was introduced in 2010, it was instant classic - probably one of the best looking compact hatches ever produced. Far nicer than this Giulia vs competition... 12 months later, serious issues appeared with DCT transmissions where pretty much almost everyone had their replaced, several times. Thats a life of Alfista.

As to Giulia, I think this version looks fine... but I dont think base car based on this interior will look anywhere close to class leading.. i hope i am wrong but it looks way cheaper than C class and even base BMWs.

Also, there is nothing niche about Alfa... Alfa is not a niche brand, Alfa is not attempting to be a niche brand. It is a mainstream brand that Fiat mishandled and destroyed in past 10 years.

FCA's plans for Alfa is 400k sales by 2018. Thats 4x sales of Jaguar and about similar to Volvo sales, but with much, much smaller amount of models.

For Alfa to reach 400k sales that FCA announced as their plan few days back, this Giulia has to be smash success and take significant sales from Germans in Europe, based on strength of fleet models. Alfa has to beat many other manufacturers that have not disappeared in the past 10 years, such as Jaguar, Volvo, Acura, Infiniti, etc.

Heck, FCA is planning for Alfa Romeo to beat Infiniti and match Acura in the USA with 150k yearly sales by 2018.

All of that sounds very crazy to me. But who knows, maybe they will manage to sell 1.4t and 2.2JDM at Mercedes prices (planned starting price is €35k Euros - same as new XE). Maybe they will instantly rebuild their long lost dealer network and maybe they will increase their sales by 700% in next 3 years, soundly beating brands like ones mentioned above... maybe pigs will fly as well.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 06:04 PM
  #40  
chromedome's Avatar
chromedome
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 51
From: CN
Default

Agreed. Maybe most of the commenters here are from the US where the last Alfa was the 164. In Europe and Asia, Alfa were selling the 159 and continue to sell the Mito and Giulietta. Interesting cars but as a prior owner, I found them horribly unreliable and whatever allure they had evaporated when stuff starts falling off.

Alfa and Fiat are mad if they think they can sell more cars than Jaguar. Their reputation in Europe is dire and no buyer in their right mind would go for a Giulia compared to the bestseller 320d.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 06:38 PM
  #41  
TangoRed's Avatar
TangoRed
Thread Starter
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 24
From: Washington
Default

I can agree on their over-ambitious sales targets. Marchionne is an interesting guy, that's for sure...
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 07:16 PM
  #42  
cino's Avatar
cino
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
I can understand that Alfa was not available in the USA for a long time... but Alfa has been around Europe forever.

Reason people do not trust FCA when it comes to Alfa is because in reality Alfa has had nothing to do with Ferrari or Maserati for past 30 years... it was Fiat's sporty wannabe premium brand that has failed to deliver with every single model they have produced since I remember.

It always starts great and ends horrible... thats a life of Alfista. When Giulietta was introduced in 2010, it was instant classic - probably one of the best looking compact hatches ever produced. Far nicer than this Giulia vs competition... 12 months later, serious issues appeared with DCT transmissions where pretty much almost everyone had their replaced, several times. Thats a life of Alfista.

As to Giulia, I think this version looks fine... but I dont think base car based on this interior will look anywhere close to class leading.. i hope i am wrong but it looks way cheaper than C class and even base BMWs.

Also, there is nothing niche about Alfa... Alfa is not a niche brand, Alfa is not attempting to be a niche brand. It is a mainstream brand that Fiat mishandled and destroyed in past 10 years.

FCA's plans for Alfa is 400k sales by 2018. Thats 4x sales of Jaguar and about similar to Volvo sales, but with much, much smaller amount of models.

For Alfa to reach 400k sales that FCA announced as their plan few days back, this Giulia has to be smash success and take significant sales from Germans in Europe, based on strength of fleet models. Alfa has to beat many other manufacturers that have not disappeared in the past 10 years, such as Jaguar, Volvo, Acura, Infiniti, etc.

Heck, FCA is planning for Alfa Romeo to beat Infiniti and match Acura in the USA with 150k yearly sales by 2018.

All of that sounds very crazy to me. But who knows, maybe they will manage to sell 1.4t and 2.2JDM at Mercedes prices (planned starting price is €35k Euros - same as new XE). Maybe they will instantly rebuild their long lost dealer network and maybe they will increase their sales by 700% in next 3 years, soundly beating brands like ones mentioned above... maybe pigs will fly as well.
What I mean is, Mercedes has a range from A class to S class, and BMW has 1 to 7 series. Alfa doesn't have a comparable lineup. If we want to compare, we should compare the car in the same segment, not the entire lineup. Remember we were talking about interior quality/design, not reliability. I have no comment about the reliability, I don't have a solid argument or proof of that.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2015 | 07:22 PM
  #43  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20,237
Likes: 274
Default

Originally Posted by chromedome
Agreed. Maybe most of the commenters here are from the US where the last Alfa was the 164. In Europe and Asia, Alfa were selling the 159 and continue to sell the Mito and Giulietta. Interesting cars but as a prior owner, I found them horribly unreliable and whatever allure they had evaporated when stuff starts falling off.

Alfa and Fiat are mad if they think they can sell more cars than Jaguar. Their reputation in Europe is dire and no buyer in their right mind would go for a Giulia compared to the bestseller 320d.
Jag sells very small amount of cars :-). But I guess new XE should change that. LR on the other hand is successful and they overall make a lot of money for Tata.

However, them thinking they can match Acura in the USA and beat Infiniti in 3 years? 400% increase their European sales with many dealers closed today?

Looking over at Alfa sales in Europe, they have 205k in 2001 and they have 59k in 2014. And thats with very strong Italian market for them where most of the sales are.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2015 | 06:24 AM
  #44  
Brantta's Avatar
Brantta
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Just a little bit of fact checking.
Originally Posted by spwolf
FCA's plans for Alfa is 400k sales by 2018. Thats 4x sales of Jaguar and about similar to Volvo sales, but with much, much smaller amount of models..
1. 4x sales of Jaguar in 2014 (3 models)
2. FCA's plans for Alfa is 400k sales in 2018 across 8 models
So, 8 Alfas are much smaller amount of models than 3 Jaguars or 6 Volvos? What?

Originally Posted by spwolf
For Alfa to reach 400k sales that FCA announced as their plan few days back, this Giulia has to be smash success and take significant sales from Germans in Europe, based on strength of fleet models.
400k sales world-wide across 8 models, including two CUV's. It's not just Giulia.

Originally Posted by spwolf
Alfa has to beat many other manufacturers that have not disappeared in the past 10 years, such as Jaguar, Volvo, Acura, Infiniti, etc.
Jaguar, Volvo, Acura, Infiniti, Cadillac,...they are all damaged brands.
Originally Posted by spwolf
Maybe they will instantly rebuild their long lost dealer network and maybe they will increase their sales by 700% in next 3 years, soundly beating brands like ones mentioned above... maybe pigs will fly as well.
Increase from 67k to 400k is 500%, not 700%.

Originally Posted by spwolf
However, them thinking they can match Acura in the USA and beat Infiniti in 3 years? 400% increase their European sales with many dealers closed today?
European sales:
2014 sales - 59k
2018 plan - 150k
That's increase of 150%, not 400%. But it's a 300% increase of Alfa models, 2 --> 8. (4c not included)

Originally Posted by spwolf
Looking over at Alfa sales in Europe, they have 205k in 2001 and they have 59k in 2014. And thats with very strong Italian market for them where most of the sales are.
Very strong Italian market, you say?
Italian market sales:
2001 - 2.4 million
2014 - 1.35 million

Last edited by Brantta; Jun 27, 2015 at 06:30 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2015 | 09:20 AM
  #45  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,422
Likes: 249
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by NickTee
Interior looks kind of cheap, like they grabbed parts from an American car's scrap pile, but the specs sound good. Definitely not on the same level as BMW or Mercedes quality-wise. Slapping carbon fiber everywhere doesn't make it nice.
If it's true carbon fiber trim, though, and not the fake stuff, that is not a cheap material.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:07 AM.