View Poll Results: Best designed lineup?
Chrysler
1
2.08%
Ford
6
12.50%
GM
1
2.08%
Honda
0
0%
Hyundai
7
14.58%
Kia
4
8.33%
Mazda
10
20.83%
Nissan
2
4.17%
Subaru
0
0%
Toyota
10
20.83%
VW
7
14.58%
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll
Best overall styling - Which automaker? (2013)
it is so-so... works in pics a lot better than in real life.. like CX5 looks plain from distance, only when you come very close to it, you notice all the detailing.
6 is better since you notice it from further... although I got to ask what happens in 2-3 years when we see a lot of them, it will become a bit of boring.
Their Interior's are actually better once you sit in them vs the pics where that nav setup looks crude a bit.
It is hard to say which one was the best overall though but Mazda seems to be in my top 1-2-3.
6 is better since you notice it from further... although I got to ask what happens in 2-3 years when we see a lot of them, it will become a bit of boring.
Their Interior's are actually better once you sit in them vs the pics where that nav setup looks crude a bit.
It is hard to say which one was the best overall though but Mazda seems to be in my top 1-2-3.
Mazda navi could be bigger. From the Spy Shots Mazda3 I think it grew a little, hopefully
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
It should be obvious that no luxury/exotic brands are an option in this poll. If they were listed, then there would be no point in including any mainstream brands because they cannot compete on design. The point is to get a sense of where mainstream autos rate for design.
Clearly people keep posting without reading any previous posts.
It should be obvious that no luxury/exotic brands are an option in this poll. If they were listed, then there would be no point in including any mainstream brands because they cannot compete on design. The point is to get a sense of where mainstream autos rate for design.
It should be obvious that no luxury/exotic brands are an option in this poll. If they were listed, then there would be no point in including any mainstream brands because they cannot compete on design. The point is to get a sense of where mainstream autos rate for design.
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Fact is, neither is true. Today's cars differ in shape and styling more than any other time in history. Go check out any decade. Today's manufacturing technology allows for far more varied shapes.
A box on wheels could fairly describe the Nissan Cube, or the Scion xB. But not much more.
Most cars are very sleek and stylish and very aerodynamic.
I hear some call all cars boxes on wheels, while others call every car a jellybean. Which is it?
Fact is, neither is true. Today's cars differ in shape and styling more than any other time in history. Go check out any decade. Today's manufacturing technology allows for far more varied shapes.
A box on wheels could fairly describe the Nissan Cube, or the Scion xB. But not much more.
Most cars are very sleek and stylish and very aerodynamic.
Fact is, neither is true. Today's cars differ in shape and styling more than any other time in history. Go check out any decade. Today's manufacturing technology allows for far more varied shapes.
A box on wheels could fairly describe the Nissan Cube, or the Scion xB. But not much more.
Most cars are very sleek and stylish and very aerodynamic.
That apply from the 1910s, 20s, 30s.......80s, 90s.........etc.
Except the exotics.
In the 90s, was boxy, now they are all jellybean.
Lexus Fanatic
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,422
Likes: 249
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
In the 90s, was boxy, now they are all jellybean.
Last edited by mmarshall; Jun 18, 2013 at 12:20 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
