Quick Spin: 2013 Audi RS5 Cabriolet
2013 Audi RS5 Cabriolet Gallery: http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2013-...photo-5912115/ Engine: 4.2L V8 Power: 450 HP / 317 LB-FT Transmission: 7-Speed Auto 0-60 Time: 4.9 Seconds Top Speed: 174 MPH Drivetrain: All-Wheel Drive Curb Weight: 4,420 LBS Seating: 2+2 Cargo: 10.2 CU-FT MPG: 16 City / 22 HWY Base Price: $77,900 As-Tested Price: $89,320 The Audi RS5 is a bit of an odd duck in the brand's US lineup. At the moment it is one of only two RS models – the other being the TT RS – atop a pyramid of A and higher-performing S models. It is not, however, the brand's flagship performance model – not even close – that space being occupied by variants of the R8 supercar, specifically the V10 and GT models, and upcoming 560-horsepower RS7. The RS5 does, however, owe its beating heart to those ten-cylinder R8s, its own 4.2-liter V8 almost identical to those engines save for two fewer cylinders. Outside of the R8, then, the RS5 is the lone bastion of naturally aspirated V8 power in a brand that once happily shoved 4.2-liter V8s under any hood that they would fit. Today, not even the giant Q7 SUV offers a V8. Lastly, the RS5 is not new, except to us, having been on sale in Europe in coupe form the last couple of years. While Europeans were able to enjoy the hardtop two-door without us, the RS5 Cabriolet is reaching both peoples around the same time: now. We reviewed the RS5 coupe just recently, and having spent some time with the tin-top model myself as well, here is my take on the droptop version of what I consider one of Audi's most interesting models. Driving Notes
|
Nice car, but it really doesnt have the look to be $90,000.00
I personally would like to see Audi make a A8 in coupe form to that is worth this price. Would I drive it? Yes but there are many more better vehicles out there that much better for the price with the road presence looks that goes along with it. While this has some presence of course, doesnt have the presences of the BMW 6 or CLS |
Originally Posted by AJL0365
(Post 7965145)
Nice car, but it really doesnt have the look to be $90,000.00
I personally would like to see Audi make a A8 in coupe form to that is worth this price. Would I drive it? Yes but there are many more better vehicles out there that much better for the price with the road presence looks that goes along with it. While this has some presence of course, doesnt have the presences of the BMW 6 or CLS |
It's a lot faster than 4.9 - actually in the low 4's.
Keep in mind, as you call it an A4, that Audi actually uses a modular platform form which it builds or will build all it's cars. And unlike many other 90k cars, this thing actually has track performance to justify the price of it, with a V8 that must be revved high to perform. If all you want is a fast time at the strip, it's certainly not the car for you. |
wonderful car... very stealthy looking fast.
|
It's a nice coupe, but for $90K, I have a lot more choices at that price range.
|
Originally Posted by Infra
(Post 7965211)
It's a lot faster than 4.9 - actually in the low 4's.
Keep in mind, as you call it an A4, that Audi actually uses a modular platform form which it builds or will build all it's cars. And unlike many other 90k cars, this thing actually has track performance to justify the price of it, with a V8 that must be revved high to perform. If all you want is a fast time at the strip, it's certainly not the car for you. I get the modular platform. The A5 still is an A4 coupe just like the upcoming 4 series is a 3 series at heart. The RS5 is slow for the price AND heavy. Both the S8 and 7 series are quicker to 60... I'm shocked that the RS5 weighs only 100 lbs less than my 7 series. Now if the RS5 weighed as much as the Nissan GTR and had similar performance, it might be a steal at $90K. |
Originally Posted by kwr
(Post 7965571)
I get the modular platform. The A5 still is an A4 coupe just like the upcoming 4 series is a 3 series at heart.
The RS5 is slow for the price AND heavy. Both the S8 and 7 series are quicker to 60... I'm shocked that the RS5 weighs only 100 lbs less than my 7 series. Now if the RS5 weighed as much as the Nissan GTR and had similar performance, it might be a steal at $90K. The 750 has the same horsepower and weighs much more, it's not faster to 60. The RS5 coupe will hit 60 in 4 seconds - 4.9 for the cabriolet is not an official NOR tested number. Expect it to be 4.1 - 4.2. Again, though, if that's what your argument is (drag strip comparison), you've lost sight of the point of this car. Can you name something else that has both the capability AND the refinement? The list of competitors (not the cars you named) is rather short. |
i love the rs5 as a car, very nice. but true at 90k, i am scratching my head a little.
|
Others to consider: Chevrolet Camaro ZL1, Chevrolet Corvette, Ford Mustang Shelby GT500, or Jaguar F-Type. Each of these options are tens of thousands of dollars less. None of these options are based on a compact FWD sedan platform, however.
Fun fact: The Audi RS5 convertible is actually 55 pounds heavier than a Chrysler 300 SRT8. That's a full-sized RWD sedan with a 6.4 liter iron block V8. It's funny how weight only matters if the vehicle doesn't have a German badge... |
Originally Posted by Infra
(Post 7965753)
The S8 is a $120k car and is not a convertible; The RS5 coupe would run around $80k. What is your level of comparison here?
The 750 has the same horsepower and weighs much more, it's not faster to 60. The RS5 coupe will hit 60 in 4 seconds - 4.9 for the cabriolet is not an official NOR tested number. Expect it to be 4.1 - 4.2. Again, though, if that's what your argument is (drag strip comparison), you've lost sight of the point of this car. Can you name something else that has both the capability AND the refinement? The list of competitors (not the cars you named) is rather short. I also realize 0-60 is only one aspect of performance. With this said, I do like the A5. I almost bought one instead of the 7 and recently considered the coupe version of the RS5 untill it dawned on me how overpriced it was. The RS5 makes the S5 look like a bargain. Maybe I'll pull the trigger on an S5 next, stay tuned... |
Curious as to when they drop this 4.2L V8 for the new 4.0L TT V8 setup
|
Originally Posted by kwr
(Post 7966031)
Again the RS5 is overweight. The 7 ONLY weighs 100 lbs more than it with a (BMW stated) 0-60 of 4.7 secs. Clearly I realize the S8 and 7 series do not compete with the RS5. If you go back to my inital post, my point was this car is slow for what you get or simply put it is over priced. It makes absolutely no sense for an RS (not base or S line) to be so heavy and outgunned to 60 MPH by sedans and SUVs. There is no way this car at 4400+ lbs is track ready.
I also realize 0-60 is only one aspect of performance. With this said, I do like the A5. I almost bought one instead of the 7 and recently considered the coupe version of the RS5 untill it dawned on me how overpriced it was. The RS5 makes the S5 look like a bargain. Maybe I'll pull the trigger on an S5 next, stay tuned... The car has active differentials to push it around corners. These add lots of weight, so any straight weight comparison against a RWD sedan with an open rear differential is totally pointless. It feels much lighter than it is. You are blantantly ignoring facts to support your pre-conceived bias against the car. Your perspective is completely skewed. If you don't like the car, cool. Everyone has different tastes. I'm simply pointing out factually wrong information you are posting. |
As many know my affinity for the S5, the RS5 has many issues with that bigger engine and it's handling suffers for it...
However, it appears they have used the HP to torque ratio (450hp to "only" 317 lbs) in order to make it a cruiser, rather than a true sports car Cooley has an excellent review below... listen to his comments about the ride: http://reviews.cnet.com/coupe-hatchb...-35760943.html That being said, if it were me, $90K for the cabrio= :thumbdn::thumbdn::thumbdn: $74K for the coupe=:thumbup::thumbup::thumbup::thumbup: |
Originally Posted by kwr
(Post 7966031)
Again the RS5 is overweight.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:10 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands