Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

MM Review: 2011 Buick Regal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-11, 05:27 PM
  #31  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ty419
Just more of old GM proving that new GM is not real.

The Opel Insignia was originally supposed to be rebadged as as the next Saturn Aura. Since Saturn has left the building, GM needed a new badge for the Opel. Would have made a great G6. O yeah, Pontiac has left the building as well. OK, let's make it a Malibu. Whoops, we already made a new Malibu on this same platform that comes out next year. By default, it became a Buick.
If the Buick seems really Saturn-like, it's because it is. Not only that, but the Russelsheim factory had difficulty with production early on and the cars had quality issues known to GM. They even had to replace some media test cars. They even publicly stated that quality would improve when production moved to Canada. Instead of waiting for the Canadian facility to be on line Q1 2011, they shipped the cars from Russelsheim factory so that they could get the car on the road as fast as possible. Let me repeat that: Instead of fixing the issues with the Russelsheim cars or waiting to ship the car until the Canada facility was online, GM decided they would just ship subpar products for several months until production switched to the "assumed" higher quality facility. I get the feeling they knew it wouldn't get any better. Either way, the public is being lied to and directly manipulated again, as usual.

Now for the pricing. Originally intended to be an Aura, the car would have been in the Aura's price range. Due to the cost of changing it to a Buick relatively late in the production cycle and an extremely unfavorable exchange rate last year, the Regal was forced to be priced nearly as high as the Lacrosse when both are in base trim, but the base trim was originally not available, making this a full-on CF. GM says it would rather lose money on the early models from Germany than raise the price for only one model year, meaning that it was somewhere implied that the price should be even higher to cover the expenses of the car.

All in all, this is another rebadged, low quality, overpriced offering from GM and they are more than happy to continue in the GM tradition of producing junk, claiming it is on par with real cars, pandering lies and deceit to the media and the public, and marketing the heck out of it until they fool enough people. They should be ashamed and embarrassed to operate this way. It is really disturbing that they are so disconnected from reality. Almost as disturbing as the number of people they have tricked into believing there is a new GM.
It probably became a Buick by more than just default. What you say about Saturn, Pontiac, and the new Malibu is true, but it is also a fact that Buick specifically wanted a purpose-designed sport-sedan to try to appeal to a younger, more sport-oriented crowd. GM simply can't afford to simply throw money away any more like it did for decades (particularly with its government-repayment obligations), so the quick, easy answer for Buick was obvious. Most of the engineering and development costs for the Insignia had already been done in Europe, so it was pretty much just a matter of rebadging the trim, a few interior parts, and certifying the car to U.S. safety/emissions laws.

As far as the idea of GM just slick-marketing another overpriced piece of junk (as you phrase it), it is true that Opel-derived vehicles have not been particularly reliable. But GM, over the last five years or so, has made notable improvements in several areas relating to quality and fit/finish. Time will tell if the new Regals become lemons or not.

Last edited by mmarshall; 05-01-11 at 05:32 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 05-01-11, 05:52 PM
  #32  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ggravant
I thought it was crazy that Buick was offering a manual transmission in ANY vehicle. I would like to give the turbo manual a spin sometime ...
6MT Turbo models aren't readily kept in stock in my area. Not many people want them, perhaps because of the dense D.C.-area traffic (almost as bad as L.A.). But that might not be the case in your area. If you can find a turbo 6MT, go for it.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 05-01-11, 06:06 PM
  #33  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blackraven
Since the old drivers of Buick are heading into permanent retirement (or to their deathbed), the question remains as to what will make Buick relevant in today's automotive world. Hence the shift by Buick to attract young buyers by moving into something more dynamic (instead of old and conservative)

This is IMHO the step in the right direction for Buick.

I see that idea as somewhat flawed. It was the old conservative Buick drivers (and Buicks themselves) that MADE the company and kept it going all these years. Yes, the very oldest of them are dying off, but that age bracket is rapidly being replaced by the largest Baby-Boom generation in history (which I'm a part of)......I'm talking about millions and millions of people in their 50s and, some cases, early 60s. Most or them aren't going to want sports-sedans like the Regal. They may not all want Lucernes, but enough of them ARE going to want them that, IMO, Buick is foolish in dumping that car....like Cadillac dumping the DTS.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 05-01-11, 07:47 PM
  #34  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The strong selling Lacrosse is selling very well to 50+ baby boomers and I respect Buick's decision to produce comfy and modern cars of that calibre, (instead of substandard junk of recent years tailored to a dying breed of less sophisticated/demanding buyers.). Buick and GM no longer have the luxury of repeating past mistakes and losing billions in the process with a bunch of dated cars.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 05-01-11, 07:55 PM
  #35  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 10,987
Received 137 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
The strong selling Lacrosse is selling very well to 50+ baby boomers and I respect Buick's decision to produce comfy and modern cars of that calibre, (instead of substandard junk of recent years tailored to a dying breed of less sophisticated/demanding buyers.). Buick and GM no longer have the luxury of repeating past mistakes and losing billions in the process with a bunch of dated cars.
Boomers have been driving different types of cars vs. their parents. Their preferences for retirement vehicles are going to be different than previous generations. Different tastes and requirements.

Last edited by LexFather; 05-02-11 at 07:46 AM.
LexBob2 is online now  
Old 05-01-11, 07:58 PM
  #36  
ggravant
Driver
 
ggravant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
6MT Turbo models aren't readily kept in stock in my area. Not many people want them, perhaps because of the dense D.C.-area traffic (almost as bad as L.A.). But that might not be the case in your area. If you can find a turbo 6MT, go for it.
I just checked around and there are a few available, so I might just do that
ggravant is offline  
Old 05-01-11, 10:11 PM
  #37  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
Boomers have been driving different types of cars vs. their parents. Their preferences for retirement vehicles are going to be different than previous generations. Different tastes and requirements.
So far, the evidence on that is mixed. Baby-Boomers did cause a lot of the rise in BMW, Mercedes, and Audi sales (which, of course, were different from many of the vehicles their parents drove), but, as they continue to age and develop arthritis and weak backs, legs, etc.....those big, old luxo-cruisers don't seem to look so bad. Some of my own friends, as a matter of fact (who once scorned vehicles like the Cadillac DTS and Lincoln Town Car) now say that they'd like to have one. Now, I wouldn't go that far myself ........those cars can be bulky and hard to manuver and park at close quarters, and, as some here have noted, are not particularly well-engineered, but there is no denying their comfort.

Last edited by mmarshall; 05-01-11 at 10:15 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 05-02-11, 05:51 AM
  #38  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,842
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ty419
Just more of old GM proving that new GM is not real.

The Opel Insignia was originally supposed to be rebadged as as the next Saturn Aura. Since Saturn has left the building, GM needed a new badge for the Opel. Would have made a great G6. O yeah, Pontiac has left the building as well. OK, let's make it a Malibu. Whoops, we already made a new Malibu on this same platform that comes out next year. By default, it became a Buick.

If the Buick seems really Saturn-like, it's because it is. Not only that, but the Russelsheim factory had difficulty with production early on and the cars had quality issues known to GM. They even had to replace some media test cars. They even publicly stated that quality would improve when production moved to Canada. Instead of waiting for the Canadian facility to be on line Q1 2011, they shipped the cars from Russelsheim factory so that they could get the car on the road as fast as possible. Let me repeat that: Instead of fixing the issues with the Russelsheim cars or waiting to ship the car until the Canada facility was online, GM decided they would just ship subpar products for several months until production switched to the "assumed" higher quality facility. I get the feeling they knew it wouldn't get any better. Either way, the public is being lied to and directly manipulated again, as usual.

Now for the pricing. Originally intended to be an Aura, the car would have been in the Aura's price range. Due to the cost of changing it to a Buick relatively late in the production cycle and an extremely unfavorable exchange rate last year, the Regal was forced to be priced nearly as high as the Lacrosse when both are in base trim, but the base trim was originally not available, making this a full-on CF. GM says it would rather lose money on the early models from Germany than raise the price for only one model year, meaning that it was somewhere implied that the price should be even higher to cover the expenses of the car.

All in all, this is another rebadged, low quality, overpriced offering from GM and they are more than happy to continue in the GM tradition of producing junk, claiming it is on par with real cars, pandering lies and deceit to the media and the public, and marketing the heck out of it until they fool enough people. They should be ashamed and embarrassed to operate this way. It is really disturbing that they are so disconnected from reality. Almost as disturbing as the number of people they have tricked into believing there is a new GM.
what are the Insignia issues? I am not aware of it, it has been selling well in Europe.

Also to note, that is standard for car manufacturers, if there is an technical issue, they keep producing cars and fixing them later. Unless there is some huge safety problem or recall.
spwolf is online now  
Old 05-02-11, 05:57 AM
  #39  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,768
Received 2,127 Likes on 1,379 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
Boomers have been driving different types of cars vs. their parents. Their preferences for retirement vehicles are going to be different than previous generations. Different tastes and requirements.
and different budgets. many are broke or will be broke because of healthcare costs.
bitkahuna is online now  
Old 05-02-11, 07:19 AM
  #40  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 10,987
Received 137 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
and different budgets. many are broke or will be broke because of healthcare costs.
That, and insufficient savings...
LexBob2 is online now  
Old 05-02-11, 07:51 AM
  #41  
IS-SV
Lexus Fanatic
 
IS-SV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: tech capital
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
That, and insufficient savings...
And those nearly bankrupt, unhealthy and/or senile types won't be the target buyer for any tier 1 or tier 2 premium car maker.
IS-SV is offline  
Old 05-02-11, 07:53 AM
  #42  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by IS-SV
And those nearly bankrupt, unhealthy and/or senile types won't be the target buyer for any tier 1 or tier 2 premium car maker.
They might since they can lease a G37 for $299 a month
 
Old 05-02-11, 08:38 AM
  #43  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
They might since they can lease a G37 for $299 a month
With how much down? Nissan and Infiniti had better be careful with lease rates. That's partly how they got into financial trouble before Renault bought them out. They underestimated the amount of depreciation on their cars, which set projected residual-value and lease-payments.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 05-02-11, 08:47 AM
  #44  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
With how much down? Nissan and Infiniti had better be careful with lease rates. That's partly how they got into financial trouble before Renault bought them out. They underestimated the amount of depreciation on their cars, which set projected residual-value and lease-payments.
0 in most cases or a bare minimum....don't mean to take it off topic...back to teh Regal, my bad.
 
Old 08-17-14, 10:23 AM
  #45  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,484
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

I had a chance to sit in the new Regal. It was used at a private dealer.

I was surprised how nice it was. For the first time ever I though I was not in a cheaper feeling GM car. The Regal really feels like a cut above a typical GM car. The doors were nice and heavy and material quality was a surprise.

I also like the styling. This is a sleeper type car.

Now I must point out one thing, the passenger seat had the cheapest SRT up I have ever seen in a passenger car. The forward/rear movement was manual, the recline feature was manual, but then there was this power up/down button for the height. How strange.

But overall, its a nicer car than I thought, totally different than the GM type materials and interior that I was expecting.
Toys4RJill is offline  


Quick Reply: MM Review: 2011 Buick Regal



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:12 AM.