Buying American cars vs Foreign cars.
#31
Lexus Fanatic
Originally Posted by CDNROCKIES
The UAW is the cancer of the American auto industry.
Times change.
And the excessive level of government regulations on new cars doesn't help, either. That adds a huge amount to design and production costs.
#32
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
The only GM product i would drive would be an avalanche, but that it is it. If i were to buy American it would be a ford/lincoln. Just recently i drove the lincoln equivalent to the taurus and taurus x? (previous freestyle?) and i was impressed not only by the way they drove, but the way they were made to. Also the sync system is actually quite easy to use, major props to ford
#33
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
it's still a cancer, but it's dying
sadly, the change we got with the new gm and chrysler stiffed taxpayers for over 50 billion.
on that i agree 100%
Times change.
And the excessive level of government regulations on new cars doesn't help, either. That adds a huge amount to design and production costs.
#34
Lexus Fanatic
http://www.cadillac.com/escaladeExt/2011/
If i were to buy American it would be a ford/lincoln. Just recently i drove the lincoln equivalent to the taurus and taurus x? (previous freestyle?) and i was impressed not only by the way they drove, but the way they were made to. Also the sync system is actually quite easy to use, major props to ford
I was sorry to see the Freestyle/Taurus X go. It was a sensible, well-designed vehicle.....somewhat akin to a larger, roomier Subaru Outback.
Last edited by mmarshall; 03-24-11 at 07:51 PM.
#35
Lexus Fanatic
I haven't seen the details of every new UAW plant-contract, but, in general, their wages are down to (roughly) the levels that are paid in a number of the non-UAW auto plants down south (BMW, Mercedes, Hyundai, Nissan, etc....)
Much of the arguments for the deal, though, were that, despite taxpayer money, things would be better in the long run. And the opinion of a number of posters here (they know who they are) is that getting rid of 4 divisions at GM was a good buisness decision, and that it will have the effect of reversing money-loss. I partially, but don't entirely agree.
Yes, part of it is what the government demands on new cars, and part, of course, is what consumers want.
sadly, the change we got with the new gm and chrysler stiffed taxpayers for over 50 billion.
on that i agree 100%
#36
Lexus Fanatic
We've already discussed Saturn numerous times (and disagreed)...so I won't rehash that here again, but discarding Pontiac decades ago, like you suggested, may not have been a wise move either. The Grand-Am, for quite some time, was one of the top-selling American-nameplate cars, though not quite to the popularity level of the Ford Taurus. But I agree that Pontiac also did more than its share of poorly-made vehicles with lousy fit/finish, not to mention the Aztek.
#38
Recovering Lexus Addict
When I was shopping for a winter DD last summer, it came down to a Taurus X or Outback. The Taurus X had more interior room and power than a 4 cylinder Outback. However, accessibility for my wife was somewhat worse with the X due to the added seat height and short distance between the passenger seat and front of the door frame. The X also had an unneeded (for us) 3rd row seat and took up a lot more room in my garage. Given the mediocre performance of the AWD system of my previous Lincoln MKZ, I was more interested in trying out the Subaru AWD system. The deal was sealed with I found a private party Outback in good condition for $3K under the KBB private party price.
#39
Lexus Fanatic
When I was shopping for a winter DD last summer, it came down to a Taurus X or Outback. The Taurus X had more interior room and power than a 4 cylinder Outback. However, accessibility for my wife was somewhat worse with the X due to the added seat height and short distance between the passenger seat and front of the door frame. The X also had an unneeded (for us) 3rd row seat and took up a lot more room in my garage. Given the mediocre performance of the AWD system of my previous Lincoln MKZ, I was more interested in trying out the Subaru AWD system. The deal was sealed with I found a private party Outback in good condition for $3K under the KBB private party price.
#40
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
I just found out what it was called, a lincoln mkt. And i have driven the escalade equivalent of the avalanche, but its just a bit much for me "bling" wise. It seems like the kind of truck for someone who just wants to show off, but thats just my personal opinion. I guess you could say that about a lot of cars though
#41
Super Moderator
iTrader: (6)
What has me curious about these discussions is how much of that $ is remaining stateside? The factory workers sure, corporate and off shore shareholders/investors then leading into OEM parts suppliers/contractors. These "American" vs. "Foreign" builds aren't like the 30's-60's cars. In the end it becomes an "assembled in" discussion between domestic or foreign badges.
#42
Lexus Fanatic
First, in most cases, the money that the plant-workers and plant-managers make will stay in America, unless they actually take it and spend it overseas on a vacation or have overseas financial obligations like taxes, alimony, child-support, etc....... But, even then, a good deal of it still remains in America.
Second, the money at the dealership level, in most cases, will also stay in America because the dealership has to use its income for operating expenses, running the buisness, and paying its own employees.
Now, the money that flows from the dealership to the overseas-manufacturer (e.g......when the dealer orders new vehicles from the manufacturer and they are delivered)....that's a different matter. Even if those vehicles are actually built in America, that money will probably not stay in America, but, of course, be transfered overseas into that corporation's country and accounting system and/or to the overseas-shipping companies that actually carry the vehicles.
Last edited by mmarshall; 03-25-11 at 03:05 PM.
#43
Lexus Fanatic
And i have driven the escalade equivalent of the avalanche, but its just a bit much for me "bling" wise. It seems like the kind of truck for someone who just wants to show off, but thats just my personal opinion. I guess you could say that about a lot of cars though
#44
Lexus Champion
From the Detroit 3, I think that only the trucks and minivans can be considered to be "All American". But even then, in component content and location of assembly, they may be considered to be less American than the Toyota Camry. And the Chrysler minivans are now assembled in Canada.
Many of the "domestic" cars may be assembled in America but much of their development engineering (especially of the underlying platforms) was done in Asia or Europe.
GM now relies upon GM Korea (the former Daewoo) to develop its small cars (like the Cruze). (The Volt is based on the Cruze.) GM relies upon GM Europe for their mid-size car platforms (the Epsilon platform was developed by Opel in Germany). GM's full-size RWD platform (for the Camaro and new Chevrolet police cruiser) come from Holden in Australia. GM's Theta platform (for the mid-size crossover Chevy Equinox and GMC Terrain) was adapted from the Epsilon platform as was the Lambda platform (for the full-size crossover Chevy Traverse, Buick Enclave and GMC Acadia). The Buick Regal is a re-badged Opel Insignia. The Buick LaCrosse had much design input from the Chinese.
Ford's car platforms are also international. The new sub-compact Fiesta and compact Focus are European designs. The mid-size Fusion and MKZ are built on an adapted Mazda6 platform, as are the Edge and MKX. The Taurus and MKS are on adapted Volvo platforms, as are the Flex, MKT and Explorer. The next Fusion is supposed to be based on the European Ford Mondeo. The next Escape is likely based upon an European design also. Safety innovations seem to have come from Volvo. Off-road innovations came from Land Rover. (Ford took a lot from their former European Premium Automotive Group brands but gave them little in return.)
Chrysler's large cars (300, Charger and Challenger) use many Mercedes-Benz components. Chrysler's small cars (Caliber, Sebring/200, Avenger, Journey) use an adapted Mitsubishi platform.
Has car design and engineering expertise become centred in Western Europe (Germany) and East Asia (Korea, Japan and increasingly China) now?
Many of the "domestic" cars may be assembled in America but much of their development engineering (especially of the underlying platforms) was done in Asia or Europe.
GM now relies upon GM Korea (the former Daewoo) to develop its small cars (like the Cruze). (The Volt is based on the Cruze.) GM relies upon GM Europe for their mid-size car platforms (the Epsilon platform was developed by Opel in Germany). GM's full-size RWD platform (for the Camaro and new Chevrolet police cruiser) come from Holden in Australia. GM's Theta platform (for the mid-size crossover Chevy Equinox and GMC Terrain) was adapted from the Epsilon platform as was the Lambda platform (for the full-size crossover Chevy Traverse, Buick Enclave and GMC Acadia). The Buick Regal is a re-badged Opel Insignia. The Buick LaCrosse had much design input from the Chinese.
Ford's car platforms are also international. The new sub-compact Fiesta and compact Focus are European designs. The mid-size Fusion and MKZ are built on an adapted Mazda6 platform, as are the Edge and MKX. The Taurus and MKS are on adapted Volvo platforms, as are the Flex, MKT and Explorer. The next Fusion is supposed to be based on the European Ford Mondeo. The next Escape is likely based upon an European design also. Safety innovations seem to have come from Volvo. Off-road innovations came from Land Rover. (Ford took a lot from their former European Premium Automotive Group brands but gave them little in return.)
Chrysler's large cars (300, Charger and Challenger) use many Mercedes-Benz components. Chrysler's small cars (Caliber, Sebring/200, Avenger, Journey) use an adapted Mitsubishi platform.
Has car design and engineering expertise become centred in Western Europe (Germany) and East Asia (Korea, Japan and increasingly China) now?
#45
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC/ATL
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
another shallow stereotype. maybe you should look at michigan or almost all of the midwest, which also tends to favor 'american' vehicles, although the irony is a huge number of 'foreign' car plants are now in the midwest, employing tens of thousands of people.
your info say nyc/atl so i assume you think nyc is so much more enlightened not driving 'american garbage'? maybe there's less there because they rot out or fall apart due to pot holes and salt on the roads.
i can agree with that, although i'd never drive a gm or chrysler until all the 50+bn is paid back that was stolen from taxpayers.
your info say nyc/atl so i assume you think nyc is so much more enlightened not driving 'american garbage'? maybe there's less there because they rot out or fall apart due to pot holes and salt on the roads.
i can agree with that, although i'd never drive a gm or chrysler until all the 50+bn is paid back that was stolen from taxpayers.
The only reason I think the quality of crap is better in NY then GA is the yearly state inspections get the unsafe cars off the road.