2011 Sienna or 2011 Odyssey?
#61
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good to see the various responses from everyone. So there is a change of plans. Well, my parents decided to put the purchase on hold for now until midyear, but now the Tacoma is put of the consideration. They decided since we have an LX470 for carrying people why not just buy a vehicle built exclusively to carry cargo for their business hence the Tacoma came up. The Tundra was ruled out because it is too big and does not fit in our driveway. The Odyssey was ruled out too. My parents were turned off by the price and the lack of selection(I explained to them its a new model). The Honda dealer estimated our 2004 Sienna trade in value at only $3500, but it has 112,000+ miles.
#62
Good to see the various responses from everyone. So there is a change of plans. Well, my parents decided to put the purchase on hold for now until midyear, but now the Tacoma is put of the consideration. They decided since we have an LX470 for carrying people why not just buy a vehicle built exclusively to carry cargo for their business hence the Tacoma came up. The Tundra was ruled out because it is too big and does not fit in our driveway. The Odyssey was ruled out too. My parents were turned off by the price and the lack of selection(I explained to them its a new model). The Honda dealer estimated our 2004 Sienna trade in value at only $3500, but it has 112,000+ miles.
Good luck.
#63
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm hoping it's either a typo or your sienna is falling apart because $3500 sounds WAY to low. And if your parents are looking at the tacoma, heres a great tacoma forum i'm with. http://www.tacomaworld.com/forum/
Good luck.
Good luck.
#66
Pole Position
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lake Country, WI
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#67
Lexus Fanatic
That sounds pretty low but unfortunately if it needs a repaint a decent paint job especially on minivan can easily cost $4K or more plus your talking $500 or more in new tires. You may want to see what a regular used car dealership will offer as sometimes they are not as picky about the condition of the car and may not figure in the repaint if it is not too bad. If they are all saying it needs an expensive repaint which is going to kill what they offer you may want to look at trying to find a place on your own that will repaint it for less, if you do your own prep that will lower the price.
#68
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SC
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am a sales consultant for Nissan and my dealership just received its first Quest. We will be doing our certification process starting tomorrow. At first glance, it is absolutely beautiful inside. It got in after dark so I didnt get a chance to see the outside too well.
#70
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've been looking at the same two minivans and plan to purchase right when the 2012s come out (there will be no changes on either van since they were both redesigned). I'm looking at a Odyssey Touring vs. Sienna XLE with nav (the Sienna SE does not offer leather, which rules it out). Both my wife and I far prefer the Odyssey for these reasons:
1. Honda drives better... you feel more 'in control.'
2. Honda interior is world's better. Sienna is plain looking and has cheap, hard plastics everywhere. I can't believe this is from the same company that makes my family's IS350 and GS350.
3. We dislike the look of roof rails and the Honda does not include them (they're optional).
4. The Sienna's 2nd row seats slide on exposed tracks. What was Toyota thinking? These will get filled with dirt, crumbs, food, etc. and be impossible to clean.
5. We actually like the look of the Odyssey in person... it is much more car-like in its stance whereas the Sienna is more like a traditional van.
6. Although the XLE with nav does not have it (and the Limited), all other Siennas have a 1970s mast antenna on the hood.
7. More legroom in the Honda's 2nd row (40.9" vs. 37.6") and 3rd row (42.4" vs. 36.3), a big difference in comfort.
8. Odyssey has a hard disc drive for storing music, Sienna only a 4-CD changer.
The only thing I like better in the Sienna is the keyless start. If there was no Odyssey the Sienna would be our #2 choice. But there is an Odyssey, and we prefer it. Just my opinion, I hope it helps.
1. Honda drives better... you feel more 'in control.'
2. Honda interior is world's better. Sienna is plain looking and has cheap, hard plastics everywhere. I can't believe this is from the same company that makes my family's IS350 and GS350.
3. We dislike the look of roof rails and the Honda does not include them (they're optional).
4. The Sienna's 2nd row seats slide on exposed tracks. What was Toyota thinking? These will get filled with dirt, crumbs, food, etc. and be impossible to clean.
5. We actually like the look of the Odyssey in person... it is much more car-like in its stance whereas the Sienna is more like a traditional van.
6. Although the XLE with nav does not have it (and the Limited), all other Siennas have a 1970s mast antenna on the hood.
7. More legroom in the Honda's 2nd row (40.9" vs. 37.6") and 3rd row (42.4" vs. 36.3), a big difference in comfort.
8. Odyssey has a hard disc drive for storing music, Sienna only a 4-CD changer.
The only thing I like better in the Sienna is the keyless start. If there was no Odyssey the Sienna would be our #2 choice. But there is an Odyssey, and we prefer it. Just my opinion, I hope it helps.
2.) Honda's interior quality might be better, but in terms of design, that is completely suggestive. In my opinion the Sienna interior design is worlds better than the Odyssey's interior, but to each their own.
3.) Subjective, to each their own
4.) Exposed tracks? Exactly what Sienna model were you looking at? The Sienna does not have exposed tracks, the tracks are covered up almost completely.
Here is a picture of a Sienna LE:
The tracks are mostly covered, and all other Sienna models are the same.
Yes the Odyssey has no tracks at all, but that is because the Odyssey 2nd row chairs have very little sliding range. The Sienna 2nd row chairs need the tracks because of the HUGE sliding range they offer.
You mentioned you were looking at a Sienna XLE, but the XLE has the same covered tracks as the pictured LE above.
5.) Sure, if you ignore the "lightning" character line at the side that completely ruins the look of the Odyssey IMO. Again, styling is subjective.
6.) Not something that would bother me personally.
7.) Big difference in comfort, really? You can get optional 2nd row chairs in the Sienna with footrests. That is not available at all on the Odyssey. The Sienna 2nd row chairs also slide a full 23 inches. If nobody is sitting in the back, you can slide the 2nd row chairs in the Sienna to create some huge legroom. This simply can't be done in the Odyssey. For this reason alone the Sienna IMO beats out the Odyssey in terms of comfort. Not to mention, I prefer Toyota's suspension tuning over Honda specifically when it comes to comfort.
8.) Sienna has aux and USB input, this would not bother me personally.
#71
1.) Compared to a Sienna SE, this is a moot point.
2.) Honda's interior quality might be better, but in terms of design, that is completely suggestive. In my opinion the Sienna interior design is worlds better than the Odyssey's interior, but to each their own.
3.) Subjective, to each their own
4.) Exposed tracks? Exactly what Sienna model were you looking at? The Sienna does not have exposed tracks, the tracks are covered up almost completely.
The tracks are mostly covered, and all other Sienna models are the same.
Yes the Odyssey has no tracks at all, but that is because the Odyssey 2nd row chairs have very little sliding range. The Sienna 2nd row chairs need the tracks because of the HUGE sliding range they offer.
You mentioned you were looking at a Sienna XLE, but the XLE has the same covered tracks as the pictured LE above.
5.) Sure, if you ignore the "lightning" character line at the side that completely ruins the look of the Odyssey IMO. Again, styling is subjective.
6.) Not something that would bother me personally.
7.) Big difference in comfort, really? You can get optional 2nd row chairs in the Sienna with footrests. That is not available at all on the Odyssey. The Sienna 2nd row chairs also slide a full 23 inches. If nobody is sitting in the back, you can slide the 2nd row chairs in the Sienna to create some huge legroom. This simply can't be done in the Odyssey. For this reason alone the Sienna IMO beats out the Odyssey in terms of comfort. Not to mention, I prefer Toyota's suspension tuning over Honda specifically when it comes to comfort.
8.) Sienna has aux and USB input, this would not bother me personally.
Incorrect. All Sienna models run on regular gas:
2.) Honda's interior quality might be better, but in terms of design, that is completely suggestive. In my opinion the Sienna interior design is worlds better than the Odyssey's interior, but to each their own.
3.) Subjective, to each their own
4.) Exposed tracks? Exactly what Sienna model were you looking at? The Sienna does not have exposed tracks, the tracks are covered up almost completely.
The tracks are mostly covered, and all other Sienna models are the same.
Yes the Odyssey has no tracks at all, but that is because the Odyssey 2nd row chairs have very little sliding range. The Sienna 2nd row chairs need the tracks because of the HUGE sliding range they offer.
You mentioned you were looking at a Sienna XLE, but the XLE has the same covered tracks as the pictured LE above.
5.) Sure, if you ignore the "lightning" character line at the side that completely ruins the look of the Odyssey IMO. Again, styling is subjective.
6.) Not something that would bother me personally.
7.) Big difference in comfort, really? You can get optional 2nd row chairs in the Sienna with footrests. That is not available at all on the Odyssey. The Sienna 2nd row chairs also slide a full 23 inches. If nobody is sitting in the back, you can slide the 2nd row chairs in the Sienna to create some huge legroom. This simply can't be done in the Odyssey. For this reason alone the Sienna IMO beats out the Odyssey in terms of comfort. Not to mention, I prefer Toyota's suspension tuning over Honda specifically when it comes to comfort.
8.) Sienna has aux and USB input, this would not bother me personally.
Incorrect. All Sienna models run on regular gas:
2. Agree, to each his own. I think the Odyssey's interior design is better.
3. Agree, subjective.
4. The exposed tracks are the ones shown in your photo. Yes, they're partially covered. But not all the way. I don't care about maximum sliding range of the 2nd row. I have two little kids in car seats. But those tracks will get filled with crumbs, etc.
5. Agree, styling is subjective. But I not only prefer the Odyssey's styling, but more importantly it's stance. It's simply more car-like and less like a van.
6. Agree, a mast antenna would not stop me from buying a car. But it sure looks out of place on a car in 2011.
7. I could care less about the Limited's footrests (from what I've read, they're worthless for anybody near 6' anyway). But in my van adults will be using the 3rd row (grandparents, uncles, etc.) and the leg room difference there is huge.
8. Having a hard drive is much better in my opinion.
As for the gas, I stand corrected.
I've stated it before. Everyone has their opinion. I prefer the Odyssey. If you don't, that's great. Both are great, it comes down to personal preference and personal needs.
#72
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To further add to the discussion about the 2nd row, the tracks will only really be "exposed" when you move the 2nd row chairs far back. Besides, only the smallest crumbs and dirt particles will get in there. Large pieces of food and large crumbs will be stopped by the track covers.
#73
Moderator
iTrader: (8)
I was going to send you a pm, but will answer it here since you brought it up:
Three of the issues that you brought up are easily solved
[QUOTE=Lenscap2;6034317]
1. I will not consider the Sienna SE. No matter how it drives, you can't get nav, you can't get rear entertainment and you can't get leather. With two little kids and the fact we often take road trips, these are necessities.
I didn't care for leather. It came with the vinyl/cloth center which is great for us.
As a matter of fact, I hate toyota's, honda's, mb's, bmw's leather.
The only leather that I love is lexus-buttery soft and god forbid lexus makes a minivan
I thought about replacing the stock hu, but it's actually pretty good.
Comes with mp3 disc player, usb player, ipod controller, BT
I was going to toss out the hu and replace it with an aftermarket all-in one. Much cheaper and more functional than getting it through oem anyways.
A $99 garmin 265 is perfect, portable (brought it with me to Hawaii), and no lock out.
Wife just bought a 7" philips double headrest dvd monitor for about $100. Works great and the kids are happy.
However, I'm a little picky and will go for the aftermarket double headrest with built in monitors/dvd for about $300-problem solved
4. The exposed tracks are the ones shown in your photo. Yes, they're partially covered. But not all the way. I don't care about maximum sliding range of the 2nd row. I have two little kids in car seats. But those tracks will get filled with crumbs, etc.
I've gotten a little lazy these weeks considering the rain that I haven't cleaned the inside. Yeah, when I got the van, I said to myself also: stupid design, it's going to filled with crumbs....
I expected lots of crumb down there but surprisingly, it's very minimal.
And no, I'm not defending toyota's design
the sliding tracking is perfect b/c with the 2 kids in the 2nd row, we slide them up when passengers need to access the 3rd row.
previous gen. couldn't do this with the annoying tumble and fold
5. Agree, styling is subjective. But I not only prefer the Odyssey's styling, but more importantly it's stance. It's simply more car-like and less like a van.
I thought the le and xle were pretty good already, but I liked the se much better.
6. Agree, a mast antenna would not stop me from buying a car. But it sure looks out of place on a car in 2011.
Yeah, the antenna is ugly. that's why I'm going to replace it with a stubby antenna.
Might not be a fair comparo but even a damn $80k convertible, I think jag xk, still comes with the antenna
7. I could care less about the Limited's footrests (from what I've read, they're worthless for anybody near 6' anyway). But in my van adults will be using the 3rd row (grandparents, uncles, etc.) and the leg room difference there is huge.
with the munchkins being in the 2nd row, I slide them up and the grandparents have tons of leg room for them
8. Having a hard drive is much better in my opinion.
I plug in an 8 gb thumbdrive for lots of songs. Since it can control the ipod, I also have a 60gb ipod, way more than enough
Basically, I spent about $350 and my se has been perfect for us
#74
Thanks for all the insight, I appreciate it. I'll take it into consideration as I'm not buying until the 2012s come out. No matter what we get, I'll still have my IS350 to keep me happy
#75
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My parents finally pulled the trigger and got themselves a 2011 Toyota Tacoma SR5 V6 in Magnetic Gray Metallic. Very nice truck. Basically fulfills their needs much better than either the Sienna or Odyssey.