Rumormill: Jaguar working on aluminum X-Type successor
#1
Rumormill: Jaguar working on aluminum X-Type successor
Rumormill: Jaguar working on aluminum X-Type successor
Tata Motors chief executive Carl-Peter Forster has acknowledged that Jaguar needs a smaller, higher-volume vehicle and it appears that just such a car is already under development. Unlike the less-than-stellar X-Type which was based on the second-generation Ford Mondeo, the new car should actually be a real Jaguar.
Jaguar is reportedly working on a new modular aluminum platform that would be shared between the new smaller car, the mid-sized XF and the next-generation XK. In renderings posted by AutoExpress at least, the baby Jag bears a strong resemblance to the XF but with curvier rear haunches and XJ-style taillamps. Of course, what the real thing will ultimately look like is anyone's guess.
Power will likely come from downsized and boosted four-cylinder gas and diesel engines, with the current 3.0-liter diesel V6 as a range-topper. Also look for a hybrid to enter the mix. All of this will help Jaguar meet the new EU CO2 emissions limits once the new smaller Jaguar debuts, which could happen as soon as soon as 2012.
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/07/24/r...ype-successor/
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
I wish Jaguar would go upmarket and be a niche brand. Clearly the X type and S type failed hard. Hell they dropped the name S-type for XF.
So this will likely not be called a X-type. XE or something....
The X-type is one of the cars around Atlanta people through dubs on claiming "I got a Jag" having no idea how badly this car stinks.
No thanks.
So this will likely not be called a X-type. XE or something....
The X-type is one of the cars around Atlanta people through dubs on claiming "I got a Jag" having no idea how badly this car stinks.
No thanks.
#7
Cycle Savant
iTrader: (5)
Honestly, they do.
The replacement for the X-Type should be in the sport-compact league of a BMW 3-Series or Mercedes C-Class.
It should not be a dumbed-down version of the XF/XJ; those two sell luxury over performance. For a smaller vehicle, it needs to prove that the cat has prowess. It should sell performance more than luxury.
Yes. Those two (the X-Type moreso than the S-Type) did not help flourish the essence of Jaguar. It screamed Ford; it was a flawed American product with British stodginess.
The current Jaguar family is extremely unique and prominent. The XK can prove to be as agile (if not better) than most flagship coupes. The XF is a breath of fresh air from the 5-Series and E-Class's dominance. The XJ proves that a luxo-barge flagship doesn't have to look boring and dated.
I can only imagine an appropriate sport-compact sedan that will be more exclusive than the standard 3/C/IS monikers. Let it be priced a little more, but offer somewhat-equal performance with superior quality materials that define Jaguar's luxury.
SO I SAY: BRING IT ON!!!
The replacement for the X-Type should be in the sport-compact league of a BMW 3-Series or Mercedes C-Class.
It should not be a dumbed-down version of the XF/XJ; those two sell luxury over performance. For a smaller vehicle, it needs to prove that the cat has prowess. It should sell performance more than luxury.
The current Jaguar family is extremely unique and prominent. The XK can prove to be as agile (if not better) than most flagship coupes. The XF is a breath of fresh air from the 5-Series and E-Class's dominance. The XJ proves that a luxo-barge flagship doesn't have to look boring and dated.
I can only imagine an appropriate sport-compact sedan that will be more exclusive than the standard 3/C/IS monikers. Let it be priced a little more, but offer somewhat-equal performance with superior quality materials that define Jaguar's luxury.
SO I SAY: BRING IT ON!!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
5
08-31-12 01:32 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
10
07-22-12 10:50 PM