Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Cracking Engine Blocks on 2006, 2007 and a select few 2008 Honda Civic's (non Si)

Old 04-06-10, 09:14 AM
  #61  
ArmyofOne
Dysfunctional Veteran
Thread Starter
 
ArmyofOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Van Alstyne, TX
Posts: 7,828
Received 160 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GSteg
Complain to the Honda Consumer Affair and speak LOUDLY on the issue.

Honda is not in the wrong for only covering the short block if that's the problem. The head should not be replace because it's not 'defective'. The problem lies within the technician. Aluminum heads will warp if they are overheated enough. Any good tech knows the head should be inspected before putting back onto the engine block. On my last few headgasket installs, I had to mill the head and block clean to make an even surface otherwise the headgasket will not do its job properly. Thus her headgasket blew.

EDIT: Headgasket blowing a few days later after a new block has been installed is a high indication of technician error.
I would agree. Either they didnt check the head for specs, didnt mill the head/block, or they didnt re-torque the bolts in the right sequence. In any case, its not her problem, it is theirs.

Last edited by ArmyofOne; 04-06-10 at 09:49 AM.
ArmyofOne is online now  
Old 04-06-10, 09:40 AM
  #62  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

I hope you're not referring to me because I didn't quote you once at all, nor did I direct my replies to you. First time I let it go because I thought it was a mistake, but now it really seems like it's pointed at me
GSteg is offline  
Old 04-06-10, 09:48 AM
  #63  
ArmyofOne
Dysfunctional Veteran
Thread Starter
 
ArmyofOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Van Alstyne, TX
Posts: 7,828
Received 160 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

My bad, man, I misread the thing.

sorry, I am on a short fuse today. Post edited.

Carry on...
ArmyofOne is online now  
Old 04-06-10, 01:07 PM
  #64  
Threxx
Lexus Champion
 
Threxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,474
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by I8ABMR
my wifes TL had a broken engine mount that occurred after the warranty expired and they did the entire job under good will knowing that that ish was not normal
An engine mount is a cheap/easy job. Acura is also going to be more likely to hook up a customer just out of warranty.

Your story wouldn't make me feel any more confident in Honda's good will if I were a Civic owner.
Threxx is offline  
Old 04-06-10, 02:24 PM
  #65  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For those saying that blocks covered under the TSB are not defective, you have given NO plausible explanation as to how that makes sense.

I will repeat again, it makes NO SENSE for Honda to cover blocks under a TSB that are perfectly fine. Honda would NOT waste time and money covering perfectly sound blocks with a TSB, and having to replace them.

If the blocks are covered under the TSB, then that means they are vulnerable and susceptible to cracks. That doesn't mean it will happen, it simply means it can happen, and it means that those blocks do have a defect in the aluminum or the way they were manufactured.

Originally Posted by GSteg
Where are the thousands you speak of? The only statistics I've seen so far are those from a forum, and you know that is a very poor representation of any the problem because it's usually cluttered up with comments.
If you don't believe OCD, why don't you contact Honda yourself, or find out yourself. This is not a recall, so Honda is doing this quietly and silently.

Originally Posted by GSteg
How many pedals have they replaced compared to the amount of engine Honda has found defected? Let's not forget Toyota at one point replaced 3.0L V6 engines due to sludge problems, and we know it was blown way out of proportion relative to the amount of blocks that were made.
The Toyota MZ sludge issue was different. It was not a defective engine design, or defective manufacturing. If oil changes on the 3.0L V6 were done often and in a timely manner, sludge DID NOT occur. It's as simple as that. Almost all of the engines with sludge happened due to owner or shop negligence, leaving too long of a gap between oil changes.

Despite this, Toyota did eventually incur a tremendous cost of replacing engines and offering extended warranties.

Toyota minimized this problem with the GR V6 engine. They made it better able to tolerate long gaps between oil changes.

The fact is though, MOST engines, especially older engines will sludge up if you don't do oil changes in a timely manner.

Originally Posted by GSteg
It's not going to get attention because it's not a safety concern. No one got killed in it, so the media like they are, aren't going to make a big deal out of it. Will you not be satisfied until Honda gets national news or something? It's not a recall. And when I'm talking about free passes, I'm not talking about one from the government/media/blogs. I'm talking about free passes from you.
Not a safety concern? Are you kidding? You sound as if you have the same attitude as Honda executives .

What if this happens on the highway while someone is driving, and the car simply loses power?

Originally Posted by GSteg
Where is the information on the thousands that have occurred? All I asked for was a hard copy of the information, not guesses. Maybe I'm not looking hard enough, but I'm not going to spend hours looking up data for a car that does not affect me directly.
So you want a hard copy for information that is being kept quiet by Honda, YET you are not willing to put in the effort to find the information? You just want the information handed to you, otherwise you won't believe it?

Originally Posted by GSteg
Free pass right here. Had Honda had a fuel problem, you'd probably question Honda's ability to make something simple as a fuel line, that could abrupt and maybe catch on fire?
A fuel line problem is NOT as bad in my opinion as cracking engine blocks. Why is that so hard to understand?
TRDFantasy is offline  
Old 04-06-10, 02:34 PM
  #66  
Threxx
Lexus Champion
 
Threxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,474
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
The Toyota MZ sludge issue was different. It was not a defective engine design, or defective manufacturing. If oil changes on the 3.0L V6 were done often and in a timely manner, sludge DID NOT occur. It's as simple as that. Almost all of the engines with sludge happened due to owner or shop negligence, leaving too long of a gap between oil changes.
Sure you'll get varying degrees of sludge in any engine depending on driving conditions, oil type, maintenance habits, etc... but the MZ series engine was far far more prone to it than the average engine or than was considered normal.

If 'x' oil change habits will leave you with a perfectly reliable engine in 99.9% of cars on the road, but in a Toyota V6 it'll leave you needing an engine replacement, then you can't just blame the user. Sure the manual might specify 3000 mile oil change intervals, but that's a CYA measure and by most standards extreme overkill. The manual also might say to keep your tires at 32 psi... so if you let one hit 28 PSI is it your fault if you suffer a blow out due to being 4 psi under?

Certain reasonable tolerances are to be expected from modern vehicles.

With all that said I'd still rather deal with the sludge issue since at least I know I can change my oil constantly and keep things running. It seems that this issue with Honda is almost at random.

Last edited by Threxx; 04-06-10 at 02:38 PM.
Threxx is offline  
Old 04-06-10, 02:57 PM
  #67  
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
 
TRDFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: A better place
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Threxx
Sure you'll get varying degrees of sludge in any engine depending on driving conditions, oil type, maintenance habits, etc... but the MZ series engine was far far more prone to it than the average engine or than was considered normal.

If 'x' oil change habits will leave you with a perfectly reliable engine in 99.9% of cars on the road, but in a Toyota V6 it'll leave you needing an engine replacement, then you can't just blame the user. Sure the manual might specify 3000 mile oil change intervals, but that's a CYA measure and by most standards extreme overkill. The manual also might say to keep your tires at 32 psi... so if you let one hit 28 PSI is it your fault if you suffer a blow out due to being 4 psi under?

Certain reasonable tolerances are to be expected from modern vehicles.

With all that said I'd still rather deal with the sludge issue since at least I know I can change my oil constantly and keep things running. It seems that this issue with Honda is almost at random.
Yes the tolerances were very tight with the MZ V6 in terms of oil changes, but that does not mean it was a defective design technically. It was simply a design with very tight tolerances in terms of oil changes.

You sort of contradicted yourself there. Just because "x" oil change habits apply to many or most engines on the road, does NOT mean they apply to ALL engines on the road. It is short-sighted and naive to think that way. This is in fact how some owners with the MZ V6 thought, and neglected the owner's manual.

The point is, if people followed the owner's manual, there wouldn't be sludge. Even if the owner's manual suggestions seemed like overkill, following them wouldn't cause harm or problems for the car, which is the point. The owner's manual exists for a reason.

Yes reasonable tolerances are expected, and that is why I mentioned the GR engine was designed for more reasonable tolerances and limits in terms of oil changes compared to the MZ.
TRDFantasy is offline  
Old 04-06-10, 03:08 PM
  #68  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Okay guys lets not make this personal and the topic is the Engine Block issue on Civics, not any Toyota, Hyundai or any other brands issues.

The O.P does own a Civic and started the thread, he has no angle here and is a respected member.
 
Old 04-06-10, 05:03 PM
  #69  
ArmyofOne
Dysfunctional Veteran
Thread Starter
 
ArmyofOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Van Alstyne, TX
Posts: 7,828
Received 160 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Thanks Mike!

Look guys, All I was trying to do is get the info out there. I am not bashing honda. I am not bashing toyota. So toyota had some gas pedal recalls. Fixed the problem, right? Hopefully Honda will do the same here. At the very least, I alerted 3 people about this issue, who didnt already know.

If it were just 1 person, it would be worth it to make the thread. There are people out there who own other cars, not JUST Lexus. and If Lexus is the only thing you will ever own, I applaud you. I however, am not that kind of person. I like variety, and I realize that other carmakers have ALOT to offer.

It is my personal opinion that EVERY Civic owner in the HOA Database should be made aware of this issue. Send out a letter, make it clear it could never happen, but urge people to get their car checked out as soon as possible.

There wasnt even that. That coupled with their lack of cooperation in working with people on repairs that cost over 1/4 the value of the car...to me that is worse than the flaw itself.
ArmyofOne is online now  
Old 04-06-10, 06:08 PM
  #70  
IS350jet
Pole Position
 
IS350jet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Coral Springs, Fl
Posts: 2,882
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
I will repeat again, it makes NO SENSE for Honda to cover blocks under a TSB that are perfectly fine. Honda would NOT waste time and money covering perfectly sound blocks with a TSB, and having to replace them.
Yet it makes perfect sense for Toyota to recall (not TSB) over 8 million cars and trucks world wide that are perfectly fine?
Also, Honda isn't "covering" them. It's a TSB, not a recall. A TSB is simply a memo to the dealer on what to keep an eye out for on specific cars, and if seen, how to fix them. Customers aren't notified of TSB's. In most cases A TSB repair is only covered under the factory warranty only. In rare cases, a manufacturer will extend the warranty on a TSB issue but only on that part, not the entire car.
IS350jet is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 10:35 AM
  #71  
bagwell
Lexus Champion
 
bagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 11,205
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I just noticed the TSB is dated July 2008????????????

strange we never heard a peep about this until 2 years later???

Last edited by bagwell; 04-08-10 at 10:45 AM.
bagwell is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 11:05 AM
  #72  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy



If you don't believe OCD, why don't you contact Honda yourself, or find out yourself. This is not a recall, so Honda is doing this quietly and silently.
Who said I didn't believe OCD? Can you find my post where I said that? I acknowledge that some Civics are having problems. There is no denying that there are some problems with the earlier R18A1. What I ask for is a factual data sheet that actually lists how many R18A1 has been replaced relative to the amount produced. It's being blown out of proportion prematurely. I'm sure hundreds of 98-00 2GS guys have had their front lower balljoints break on them while driving, but there is no mass hysteria because it's not a recall, and it does not affect every 2GS owners even though they all use the same parts.


The Toyota MZ sludge issue was different. It was not a defective engine design, or defective manufacturing. If oil changes on the 3.0L V6 were done often and in a timely manner, sludge DID NOT occur. It's as simple as that. Almost all of the engines with sludge happened due to owner or shop negligence, leaving too long of a gap between oil changes.


Despite this, Toyota did eventually incur a tremendous cost of replacing engines and offering extended warranties.
My point was that Toyota covered a lot of engines even though they did not have to. Honda isn't listing car by specific VINs. They're doing it by years because there is not enough evidence to pinpoint exactly which Civic has the problem.


Toyota minimized this problem with the GR V6 engine. They made it better able to tolerate long gaps between oil changes.

The fact is though, MOST engines, especially older engines will sludge up if you don't do oil changes in a timely manner.
That is true. I'm an advocate of oil changes in a timely manner. No argument there.


Not a safety concern? Are you kidding? You sound as if you have the same attitude as Honda executives .

What if this happens on the highway while someone is driving, and the car simply loses power?
What real threat is there if one loses power? Death? Here is an idea. Put the car in neutral and turn on your hazards to alert other drivers. Pull along side of the road and call a tow truck.

Anything can go wrong, but you aren't going to die if the engine block cracks. If a wheel falls off, or a fuel line ruptures, that could be a bigger issue. How many stories have you heard about someone dying because their car overheated? Worse case I've seen is someone pulling along side of the road sitting there while the tow truck comes.


So you want a hard copy for information that is being kept quiet by Honda, YET you are not willing to put in the effort to find the information? You just want the information handed to you, otherwise you won't believe it?
Like I said before...I am not doubting that there are problems. I am doubting the magnitude of this 'issue' as if most R18A1 produced will detonate. I don't know about you, but I rather wait for a full investigation before making any extreme accusations, even if I never get to see the report myself.

A fuel line problem is NOT as bad in my opinion as cracking engine blocks. Why is that so hard to understand?
Therefore Toyota is in the clear because you think it's not as bad? Both issues are something the consumers do not want to deal with. The negative side is that this is a TSB for Honda Civic owners so most owners are on the line of having no warranty unless Honda does something magical like replacing every R18A1 out there. But it's not happening on every single 06-07 so they're dealing with it case by case.
GSteg is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 11:09 AM
  #73  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bagwell
I just noticed the TSB is dated July 2008????????????

strange we never heard a peep about this until 2 years later???
There are so many TSBs for every car. It's not something they publicize. If you have an issue, you bring it to the dealership to get it inspected. I know for my own car, I have over 20 TSB that I did not know of until recently. My guess is that in 2008, there weren't enough engine cracks to be a concern.
GSteg is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 11:17 AM
  #74  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OCDetailer
Thanks Mike!

Look guys, All I was trying to do is get the info out there. I am not bashing honda. I am not bashing toyota. So toyota had some gas pedal recalls. Fixed the problem, right? Hopefully Honda will do the same here. At the very least, I alerted 3 people about this issue, who didnt already know.
Yes definitely have them get the car checked out even if they haven't had a problem yet. Every manufacturer has some sort of problem, so its just best to fix it and move on. Toyota had pedal recalls, frame rusting, etc, but that won't deter me away from buying another Toyota. Things happen, but what can you do?

It is my personal opinion that EVERY Civic owner in the HOA Database should be made aware of this issue. Send out a letter, make it clear it could never happen, but urge people to get their car checked out as soon as possible.
I wish that was the case, but they will definitely not do that. It's going to cause a big scare because all of the sudden you'll be receiving 20+ TSB in the mail. Imagine if there were medical TSB stating you might have an issue because you fall in a particular age/race group. With so many TSB, you would probably drop to the ground
GSteg is offline  
Old 04-08-10, 01:25 PM
  #75  
bagwell
Lexus Champion
 
bagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 11,205
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I found a newer version of the TSB that includes 2008s as well.
Attached Files
bagwell is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Cracking Engine Blocks on 2006, 2007 and a select few 2008 Honda Civic's (non Si)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:19 AM.