If you could SEPERATE 2 auto compaines, who would it be?
Guest
Posts: n/a
If you could SEPERATE 2 auto compaines, who would it be?
Well a few days ago I asked who would you like to see combined and we got some great answers, looks like Porsche and Lexus was the most favored.
Now which companies would u like SPLIT away from one another.
Not sure if we need a list of parent companies (can someone be kind)
Toyota Lexus
Honda Acura
Renault/Nissan/Infiniti
Ford/Jaguar
Ford/Aston Marton
GM/Saab
GM/ any division
VW/Audi
VW/Lamborghini
There are others....
I would like to see Jaguar totally seperate from Ford. Ford has no clue and has only made things WORSE.
Now which companies would u like SPLIT away from one another.
Not sure if we need a list of parent companies (can someone be kind)
Toyota Lexus
Honda Acura
Renault/Nissan/Infiniti
Ford/Jaguar
Ford/Aston Marton
GM/Saab
GM/ any division
VW/Audi
VW/Lamborghini
There are others....
I would like to see Jaguar totally seperate from Ford. Ford has no clue and has only made things WORSE.
Speaks French in Russian
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,397
Likes: 100
From: What is G?
OMG, VW and Lambo in a heartbeat if they go ahead and share Lambo parts with the new Audi LeMans.
GM and all foreign divisions
Chrysler and MB (well maybe)
Hmmm, I wonder if anyone here wants to see a Toyota/Lexus split??
GM and all foreign divisions
Chrysler and MB (well maybe)
Hmmm, I wonder if anyone here wants to see a Toyota/Lexus split??
well if it's last yr, i woudl say toyota and lexus. but now they have made a very strong statement that they are going to work independently, so it's taken care of
and with that said... vw and lambo please....
the lambo brand is so damn degraded now
and with that said... vw and lambo please....
the lambo brand is so damn degraded now
Lexus Fanatic
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,422
Likes: 249
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Toyota Lexus
Honda Acura
Renault/Nissan/Infiniti
Ford/Jaguar
Ford/Aston Marton
GM/Saab
GM/ any division
VW/Audi
VW/Lamborghini
There are others....
I would like to see Jaguar totally seperate from Ford. Ford has no clue and has only made things WORSE.
Honda Acura
Renault/Nissan/Infiniti
Ford/Jaguar
Ford/Aston Marton
GM/Saab
GM/ any division
VW/Audi
VW/Lamborghini
There are others....
I would like to see Jaguar totally seperate from Ford. Ford has no clue and has only made things WORSE.
My opinion, Mike?
A 100% no-brainer for me....nothing else even comes CLOSE. Saturn HAS to leave GM. Yes, I know some of you guys like the Sky roadster. It is an interesting car, but that is only one bright spot in a sea of woes. Saturn is being ruined by GM's corporate mismanagement and is losing all of the unique features that made it such a great success in the 1990's. Saturn introduced MANY great features when the company first opened up....easy-to-service spin-off transmission filters, thermoplastic body panels that ward off corrosion, dents, and dings, no-haggle pricing on a new or Certified used car, 30-day money back guarantee with an undamaged low-mileage car and a clear title, courteous customer service, hand-washing all cars in the service bay, and quality to match the best Japanese cars of the time. Consumer Reports gave the 1990-92 Saturns as good a reliability record as Toyota and Honda. The only negative thing was a noisy engine and flimsy-feeling interior plastic, but the engine noise was OK of you did not drive at high RPM, and that cheap-feeling plastic DID hold up. I was a Saturn customer myself for a few years and had a very high opinion of the company. They would even send you free tickets to any major auto shows in your area.
So....what has happened since the late 1990's, when GM stopped letting Saturn be Saturn and started sticking their nose in more and more? Well, it started with Cynthia Trudell taking the reins. She was a classic yes-woman who did nothing but give pep talks to the troops while bending over to the GM bosses who were starting to ruin the company.
The first mistake was the mid-sized L-Bodies when they were introduced in July of 1999. Previous Saturns were all compacts that were TOTALLY unlike anything else in the GM lineup....in ways that I described above. The L-bodies were essentially plastic-bodied space-frame versions of the common-platform German Opel Omega, Cadillac Catera, and Saab 9-5...and they all more or less shared the same powertrains...especially the V6, rated at 182 HP in the L-Body. The L-bodies were not only poorly made, unlike previous Saturns (brand-new ones I test-drove were full of defects and rattles and squeaks) but they did away with the clever spin-off tranny filter and the plastic rear-fenders....they were sheet metal instead of plastic because Saturn said they couldn't pass the rear-impact tests with plastic.
However, the L-Bodies did keep plastic for the rest of the side panels. Well, reliability improved slightly the second year but still well-below average, and worse yet, the cars sold poorly, even though the L-body wagons at the time were the only domestic alternative to the Taurus-Sable mid-sized wagons.Well, the second mistake was then redesigning the interior for the 2000 model year in the good and unique small S-series cars. The 1996-1999's had gotten a major improvement inside in interior quality for 1996 but for 2000 was cheapened considerably inside with much plainer-looking and feeling plastic and less attention to detail....obviously the GM bean-counters at work.
People noticed this, and the S-series sales began to slide. So then......instead of just putting the former nice S-series interior back like it should have done, what does Saturn THEN do? They do the third mistake......replacing the whole S-series outright with the awful Ion. I don't enjoy discussing that car.....it made me want to throw up, even more than the Chris Bangle BMW's. Like the L-bodies, it completely did away with the spin-off tranny filter and used just another GM Ecotec in-line four instead of the Saturn-designed DOHC 4 in the S-series. The center-mount gauge speedo pod, like on the Toyota Echo, was a joke. Even Car and Driver mentioned in its initial test ..... "We waited all these years for an S-series replacement.....and Saturn gives us THIS? "
They couldn't believe it.OK...let's move on. Mistake number four was introducing the VUE small sport-utility with many of the same unproven and unreliable components used in the L-bodies. The VUE's AWD system in particular was unreliable and prone to many fluid leaks.
Mistake number five was the Relay minivan just introduced last winter. Not that there was anything wrong per se with a Saturn minivan, but for the first time in Saturn's history here was a vehicle not only without the Saturn engine and transmission spin-off filter, but WITHOUT ANY PLASTIC BODY PANELS AT ALL. And the Relay in truth is just a rebadged Chevy Uplander and Buick Terraza...they are essentially triplets...and the basic platform is some 9 years old.
Saturn reps say that plastic panels will soon be history.
Conventional sheet steel is the wave of Saturn's future, if GM has its way. The 30-day money-back guarantee and the no-haggle buying policies are even in some question now.If this sounds like a lot of negativity, keep in mind that this all happened in the last 5-6 years. Saturn was a marvelous company up to about the turn of the century. But.....what caused all of this? GM senior management.....and the fact that the people running Saturn starting with Trudell simply didn't have the guts to veto bad managemant decisions passed down from GM. If they were real managers they would have said......" No, Saturn was not meant to be this way, we are not going to allow it to deteriorate into another Chevrolet division) "
But.....sadly....they did.
So...my answer.......break Saturn off from GM once and for all and let them again be the marvelous company they once were.
Last edited by mmarshall; May 17, 2005 at 07:26 PM.
Trending Topics
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by mmarshall
My opinion, Mike?
A 100% no-brainer for me....nothing else even comes CLOSE. Saturn HAS to leave GM. Yes, I know some of you guys like the Sky roadster. It is an interesting car, but that is only one bright spot in a sea of woes. Saturn is being ruined by GM's corporate mismanagement and is losing all of the unique features that made it such a great success in the 1990's. Saturn introduced MANY great features when the company first opened up....easy-to-service spin-off transmission filters, thermoplastic body panels that ward off corrosion, dents, and dings, no-haggle pricing on a new or Certified used car, 30-day money back guarantee with an undamaged low-mileage car and a clear title, courteous customer service, hand-washing all cars in the service bay, and quality to match the best Japanese cars of the time. Consumer Reports gave the 1990-92 Saturns as good a reliability record as Toyota and Honda. The only negative thing was a noisy engine and flimsy-feeling interior plastic, but the engine noise was OK of you did not drive at high RPM, and that cheap-feeling plastic DID hold up. I was a Saturn customer myself for a few years and had a very high opinion of the company. They would even send you free tickets to any major auto shows in your area.
So....what has happened since the late 1990's, when GM stopped letting Saturn be Saturn and started sticking their nose in more and more? Well, it started with Cynthia Trudell taking the reins. She was a classic yes-woman who did nothing but give pep talks to the troops while bending over to the GM bosses who were starting to ruin the company.
The first mistake was the mid-sized L-Bodies when they were introduced in July of 1999. Previous Saturns were all compacts that were TOTALLY unlike anything else in the GM lineup....in ways that I described above. The L-bodies were essentially plastic-bodied space-frame versions of the common-platform German Opel Omega, Cadillac Catera, and Saab 9-5...and they all more or less shared the same powertrains...especially the V6, rated at 182 HP in the L-Body. The L-bodies were not only poorly made, unlike previous Saturns (brand-new ones I test-drove were full of defects and rattles and squeaks) but they did away with the clever spin-off tranny filter and the plastic rear-fenders....they were sheet metal instead of plastic because Saturn said they couldn't pass the rear-impact tests with plastic. However, the L-Bodies did keep plastic for the rest of the side panels. Well, reliability improved slightly the second year but still well-below average, and worse yet, the cars sold poorly, even though the L-body wagons at the time were the only domestic alternative to the Taurus-Sable mid-sized wagons.
Well, the second mistake was then redesigning the interior for the 2000 model year in the good and unique small S-series cars. The 1996-1999's had gotten a major improvement inside in interior quality for 1996 but for 2000 was cheapened considerably inside with much plainer-looking and feeling plastic and less attention to detail....obviously the GM bean-counters at work.
People noticed this, and the S-series sales began to slide. So then......instead of just putting the former nice S-series interior back like it should have done, what does Saturn THEN do? They do the third mistake......replacing the whole S-series outright with the awful Ion. I don't enjoy discussing that car.....it made me want to throw up, even more than the Chris Bangle BMW's. Like the L-bodies, it completely did away with the spin-off tranny filter and used just another GM Ecotec in-line four instead of the Saturn-designed DOHC 4 in the S-series. The center-mount gauge speedo pod, like on the Toyota Echo, was a joke. Even Car and Driver mentioned in its initial test ..... "We waited all these years for an S-series replacement.....and Saturn gives us THIS? " They couldn't believe it.
OK...let's move on. Mistake number four was introducing the VUE small sport-utility with many of the same unproven and unreliable components used in the L-bodies. The VUE's AWD system in particular was unreliable and prone to many fluid leaks.
Mistake number five was the Relay minivan just introduced last winter. Not that there was anything wrong per se with a Saturn minivan, but for the first time in Saturn's history here was a vehicle not only without the Saturn engine and transmission spin-off filter, but WITHOUT ANY PLASTIC BODY PANELS AT ALL. And the Relay in truth is just a rebadged Chevy Uplander and Buick Terraza...they are essentially triplets...and the basic platform is some 9 years old.
Saturn reps say that plastic panels will soon be history. Conventional sheet steel is the wave of Saturn's future, if GM has its way. The 30-day money-back guarantee and the no-haggle buying policies are even in some question now.
If this sounds like a lot of negativity, keep in mind that this all happened in the last 5-6 years. Saturn was a marvelous company up to about the turn of the century. But.....what caused all of this? GM senior management.....and the fact that the people running Saturn starting with Trudell simply didn't have the guts to veto bad managemant decisions passed down from GM. If they were real managers they would have said......" No, Saturn was not meant to be this way, we are not going to allow it to deteriorate into another Chevrolet division) "
But.....sadly....they did.
So...my answer.......break Saturn off from GM once and for all and let them again be the marvelous company they once were.
A 100% no-brainer for me....nothing else even comes CLOSE. Saturn HAS to leave GM. Yes, I know some of you guys like the Sky roadster. It is an interesting car, but that is only one bright spot in a sea of woes. Saturn is being ruined by GM's corporate mismanagement and is losing all of the unique features that made it such a great success in the 1990's. Saturn introduced MANY great features when the company first opened up....easy-to-service spin-off transmission filters, thermoplastic body panels that ward off corrosion, dents, and dings, no-haggle pricing on a new or Certified used car, 30-day money back guarantee with an undamaged low-mileage car and a clear title, courteous customer service, hand-washing all cars in the service bay, and quality to match the best Japanese cars of the time. Consumer Reports gave the 1990-92 Saturns as good a reliability record as Toyota and Honda. The only negative thing was a noisy engine and flimsy-feeling interior plastic, but the engine noise was OK of you did not drive at high RPM, and that cheap-feeling plastic DID hold up. I was a Saturn customer myself for a few years and had a very high opinion of the company. They would even send you free tickets to any major auto shows in your area.
So....what has happened since the late 1990's, when GM stopped letting Saturn be Saturn and started sticking their nose in more and more? Well, it started with Cynthia Trudell taking the reins. She was a classic yes-woman who did nothing but give pep talks to the troops while bending over to the GM bosses who were starting to ruin the company.
The first mistake was the mid-sized L-Bodies when they were introduced in July of 1999. Previous Saturns were all compacts that were TOTALLY unlike anything else in the GM lineup....in ways that I described above. The L-bodies were essentially plastic-bodied space-frame versions of the common-platform German Opel Omega, Cadillac Catera, and Saab 9-5...and they all more or less shared the same powertrains...especially the V6, rated at 182 HP in the L-Body. The L-bodies were not only poorly made, unlike previous Saturns (brand-new ones I test-drove were full of defects and rattles and squeaks) but they did away with the clever spin-off tranny filter and the plastic rear-fenders....they were sheet metal instead of plastic because Saturn said they couldn't pass the rear-impact tests with plastic.
However, the L-Bodies did keep plastic for the rest of the side panels. Well, reliability improved slightly the second year but still well-below average, and worse yet, the cars sold poorly, even though the L-body wagons at the time were the only domestic alternative to the Taurus-Sable mid-sized wagons.Well, the second mistake was then redesigning the interior for the 2000 model year in the good and unique small S-series cars. The 1996-1999's had gotten a major improvement inside in interior quality for 1996 but for 2000 was cheapened considerably inside with much plainer-looking and feeling plastic and less attention to detail....obviously the GM bean-counters at work.
People noticed this, and the S-series sales began to slide. So then......instead of just putting the former nice S-series interior back like it should have done, what does Saturn THEN do? They do the third mistake......replacing the whole S-series outright with the awful Ion. I don't enjoy discussing that car.....it made me want to throw up, even more than the Chris Bangle BMW's. Like the L-bodies, it completely did away with the spin-off tranny filter and used just another GM Ecotec in-line four instead of the Saturn-designed DOHC 4 in the S-series. The center-mount gauge speedo pod, like on the Toyota Echo, was a joke. Even Car and Driver mentioned in its initial test ..... "We waited all these years for an S-series replacement.....and Saturn gives us THIS? "
They couldn't believe it.OK...let's move on. Mistake number four was introducing the VUE small sport-utility with many of the same unproven and unreliable components used in the L-bodies. The VUE's AWD system in particular was unreliable and prone to many fluid leaks.
Mistake number five was the Relay minivan just introduced last winter. Not that there was anything wrong per se with a Saturn minivan, but for the first time in Saturn's history here was a vehicle not only without the Saturn engine and transmission spin-off filter, but WITHOUT ANY PLASTIC BODY PANELS AT ALL. And the Relay in truth is just a rebadged Chevy Uplander and Buick Terraza...they are essentially triplets...and the basic platform is some 9 years old.
Saturn reps say that plastic panels will soon be history.
Conventional sheet steel is the wave of Saturn's future, if GM has its way. The 30-day money-back guarantee and the no-haggle buying policies are even in some question now.If this sounds like a lot of negativity, keep in mind that this all happened in the last 5-6 years. Saturn was a marvelous company up to about the turn of the century. But.....what caused all of this? GM senior management.....and the fact that the people running Saturn starting with Trudell simply didn't have the guts to veto bad managemant decisions passed down from GM. If they were real managers they would have said......" No, Saturn was not meant to be this way, we are not going to allow it to deteriorate into another Chevrolet division) "
But.....sadly....they did.
So...my answer.......break Saturn off from GM once and for all and let them again be the marvelous company they once were.
Originally Posted by BlkGS3
VW and everything they own! Any company that creates a Flower Holder in one of their cars should NEVER touch Lambo and Audi!!!!!
VW is screwing up everything in all of their companies. That's why they're selling very low amounts of their cars. VW itself is screwing up all of their designs. Why are you trying to sell a Phaeton when you have an A8?
Their premium brands aren't getting enough attention. The only Bentley I'd consider is the GT. Audi has only the S badges going for me. I've always wanted a Ferrari over a Lambo. But Lambo isn't getting any attention these days. Bugatti... ummm do you really sell anything?
The W engines were the only thing interesting these days...
GET WITH IT VW!
Pole Position
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 29
From: Florida
Originally Posted by mmarshall
Mistake number five was the Relay minivan just introduced last winter. Not that there was anything wrong per se with a Saturn minivan
It's much worse in person. It has odd angles and a gawky appearance.
And can anyone explain to me why the rooflines on the Ion are silver regardless of the color of the car itself?
Lexus Champion
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
Well a few days ago I asked who would you like to see combined and we got some great answers, looks like Porsche and Lexus was the most favored.
Now which companies would u like SPLIT away from one another.
Not sure if we need a list of parent companies (can someone be kind)
Toyota Lexus
Honda Acura
Renault/Nissan/Infiniti
Ford/Jaguar
Ford/Aston Marton
GM/Saab
GM/ any division
VW/Audi
VW/Lamborghini
There are others....
I would like to see Jaguar totally seperate from Ford. Ford has no clue and has only made things WORSE.
Now which companies would u like SPLIT away from one another.
Not sure if we need a list of parent companies (can someone be kind)
Toyota Lexus
Honda Acura
Renault/Nissan/Infiniti
Ford/Jaguar
Ford/Aston Marton
GM/Saab
GM/ any division
VW/Audi
VW/Lamborghini
There are others....
I would like to see Jaguar totally seperate from Ford. Ford has no clue and has only made things WORSE.
seriously Ford taking over jaguar turned out to be a GOOD thing for them.
Lexus Fanatic
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,422
Likes: 249
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Originally Posted by CleanSC
Yes there is... It's BUTT *** ugly. I'm sorry but no one can look at this van and say, "Wow, that's a handsome minvan."
It's much worse in person. It has odd angles and a gawky appearance.
And can anyone explain to me why the rooflines on the Ion are silver regardless of the color of the car itself?
It's much worse in person. It has odd angles and a gawky appearance.
And can anyone explain to me why the rooflines on the Ion are silver regardless of the color of the car itself?
The Ion? Those silver roof side-panels....if they are a contrast from the regular paint color...are either special-ordered by dealerships or are bought in the Saturn parts and accessories deptartment after the sale. The essentially just clip on and off. It is one of the Ion's factory-customization features....like the wide range of Scion accesories available at Toyota dealerships. To my knowledge, they are available not just in silver ...this will explain more in detail:
http://www.saturnfans.com/Cars/ION/2...pearance.shtml
Last edited by mmarshall; May 18, 2005 at 04:38 PM.
