Saturn Sky Pics
Lexus Champion
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 21
From: California
Once again you're correct.
While stuffing a 5.7 litre V8 in Sky's engine bay may sound awkward, I have the confidence to say that given correct engineering, this small car is definitely capable of mustering higher hp/torque output from a larger six cyclinder engine, as BMW's roadster stated in the previous example.
I was hoping that GM could work on the so-called baby Northstar that's good for about 3 litre/250hp or so and use it on smaller applications such as Sky. Hopefully it'll happen some day.
For some reason, the idea of further exploring the Lotus Esprit's evolution from a 2.2 litre I-4 to 3.5 twin turbo V8 kept coming up in my head.
Jon
While stuffing a 5.7 litre V8 in Sky's engine bay may sound awkward, I have the confidence to say that given correct engineering, this small car is definitely capable of mustering higher hp/torque output from a larger six cyclinder engine, as BMW's roadster stated in the previous example.
I was hoping that GM could work on the so-called baby Northstar that's good for about 3 litre/250hp or so and use it on smaller applications such as Sky. Hopefully it'll happen some day.
For some reason, the idea of further exploring the Lotus Esprit's evolution from a 2.2 litre I-4 to 3.5 twin turbo V8 kept coming up in my head.
Jon
Originally Posted by mmarshall
The 4.4 L is a smaller and lighter engine then the 5.7L LS2. You are talking about 270 c.i vs. 350. And even then....as you yourself state....it was " stuffed " into the Z3 rather then being designed for it in the first place.
It reminds me of some of the compact cars I grew up with that had overstuffed engines that they were never designed for, like the Dodge Dart 383, Chevy Nova SS396, and the Mustang 428-429's. They were terribly front-heavy, handled like boats, wore out tires, brakes, and suspensions, and were almost impossible to work on.
They were good for nothing else but wasting gas and laying twin rubber strips down the road in a straight line.
It reminds me of some of the compact cars I grew up with that had overstuffed engines that they were never designed for, like the Dodge Dart 383, Chevy Nova SS396, and the Mustang 428-429's. They were terribly front-heavy, handled like boats, wore out tires, brakes, and suspensions, and were almost impossible to work on.
They were good for nothing else but wasting gas and laying twin rubber strips down the road in a straight line.
Lexus Fanatic
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,422
Likes: 249
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Originally Posted by Baby ///M3
Once again you're correct.
While stuffing a 5.7 litre V8 in Sky's engine bay may sound awkward, I have the confidence to say that given correct engineering, this small car is definitely capable of mustering higher hp/torque output from a larger six cyclinder engine, as BMW's roadster stated in the previous example.
I was hoping that GM could work on the so-called baby Northstar that's good for about 3 litre/250hp or so and use it on smaller applications such as Sky. Hopefully it'll happen some day.
For some reason, the idea of further exploring the Lotus Esprit's evolution from a 2.2 litre I-4 to 3.5 twin turbo V8 kept coming up in my head.
Jon
While stuffing a 5.7 litre V8 in Sky's engine bay may sound awkward, I have the confidence to say that given correct engineering, this small car is definitely capable of mustering higher hp/torque output from a larger six cyclinder engine, as BMW's roadster stated in the previous example.
I was hoping that GM could work on the so-called baby Northstar that's good for about 3 litre/250hp or so and use it on smaller applications such as Sky. Hopefully it'll happen some day.
For some reason, the idea of further exploring the Lotus Esprit's evolution from a 2.2 litre I-4 to 3.5 twin turbo V8 kept coming up in my head.
Jon
Saturn supposedly already has plans for a Red Line version of this...just don't bet on seeing an LS2. My guess...as I stated before...is a Turbo 4 with 230-240 HP.
I never thought I'd see the day when I do a double take at a Saturn 
Style wise this is a very sharp looking car. I actually like this cars style better than a Lotus Elise. I do prefer a hard top though so hopefully they will make one. I can't say if I would buy one right now though but looks wise it is great.
Style wise this is a very sharp looking car. I actually like this cars style better than a Lotus Elise. I do prefer a hard top though so hopefully they will make one. I can't say if I would buy one right now though but looks wise it is great.
Lexus Champion
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by AdrianXT
You DO realize this car is small and light, right? 
I have a feeling the Miata might look weak compared to this thing, especially if Saturn introduces a RedLine version for around $25K.
I have a feeling the Miata might look weak compared to this thing, especially if Saturn introduces a RedLine version for around $25K.
Instead, I think they ought to just add discreet badges and *maybe* a slightly more aggressive wheel/tire and suspension package. The forthcoming Redline Sky will very likely be my 2nd/weekend car - when I can afford such a thing.
Saturn has a lot of pictures (that is the title of the thread after all) on their website at http://www.saturn.com/saturn/showroo...ky.jsp?nav=710 - click "show me in the sky" and then click gallery once that page loads.
M.
Last edited by whipimpin; Mar 15, 2005 at 02:22 PM.
From my understanding, GM will postion Saturn to be an Acura competitor.
Speaks French in Russian
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,397
Likes: 100
From: What is G?
That car is hot!!! This is something that Saturn desperately needed. I also really like that Saturn Aura sedan too. Pretty good looking cars. Its about time GM brings Opel to the US(well in the form of Saturn that is).
Zombie Slayer
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,053
Likes: 3
From: East Bumble F, NJ
Originally Posted by mmarshall
The 4.4 L is a smaller and lighter engine then the 5.7L LS2. You are talking about 270 c.i vs. 350. And even then....as you yourself state....it was " stuffed " into the Z3 rather then being designed for it in the first place.
It reminds me of some of the compact cars I grew up with that had overstuffed engines that they were never designed for, like the Dodge Dart 383, Chevy Nova SS396, and the Mustang 428-429's. They were terribly front-heavy, handled like boats, wore out tires, brakes, and suspensions, and were almost impossible to work on.
They were good for nothing else but wasting gas and laying twin rubber strips down the road in a straight line.
It reminds me of some of the compact cars I grew up with that had overstuffed engines that they were never designed for, like the Dodge Dart 383, Chevy Nova SS396, and the Mustang 428-429's. They were terribly front-heavy, handled like boats, wore out tires, brakes, and suspensions, and were almost impossible to work on.
They were good for nothing else but wasting gas and laying twin rubber strips down the road in a straight line.
mmarshall, please don't forget the AC Cobra, later to be called the Shelby Cobra. The original AC was built with an inline 4-cyl. When Carol Shelby got ahold of it he fit a Ford 289 in nicely. Then he squeezed a 429 in there, and a side oiler at that!!! Now, I know the Sky has it's market segment but I disagree with your statement that by stuffing a large engine in the fron of a car you are guaranteed to upset handling, braking, etc. You probably will, but it's not guaranteed if other factors are compensated for as well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
