|
AMG SL65 In it's Element... The Dragstrip!
GOT TORQUE? :eek2:
*right-click-save-as* Stock SL65 AMG http://www.treynor.com/Scott-SL65.wmv http://web1.berlin205.server4free.de...Walter_027.jpg |
That car is crazy fast, 11.69 :yikes:
|
that car is sweet !!
|
this is so sweet. thanks for the clip txstyle.
and the porsche lost to SL?? waht... edit: ok, that amg is about as much as a 360 MSRP $179,720.00* Engine AMG-built twin-turbocharged 6.0L SOHC 36-valve V-12 engine Net Power 604 hp @ 5500 rpm Net Torque 738 lb-ft @ 2,000 - 4,000 rpm |
Originally Posted by 2000gs300
this is so sweet. thanks for the clip txstyle.
and the porsche lost to SL?? waht... edit: ok, that amg is about as much as a 360 MSRP $179,720.00* Engine AMG-built twin-turbocharged 6.0L SOHC 36-valve V-12 engine Net Power 604 hp @ 5500 rpm Net Torque 738 lb-ft @ 2,000 - 4,000 rpm How would it do against an SLR? Anyone know??? |
....................
|
Originally Posted by GS3Tek
Wow!!! Didn't look like there were any worty competitors :bigthumbu
How would it do against an SLR? Anyone know??? EDIT: Treynor's a ************ nutcase with his cars, damn! James |
Treynor'
googled it and some came out, but none really informative. |
It's weird, it's like a family website but under his page it's basically all about his cars. Here's direct to his page.
http://www.treynor.com/BenMain.htm James |
Originally Posted by jet864
It's weird, it's like a family website but under his page it's basically all about his cars. Here's direct to his page.
http://www.treynor.com/BenMain.htm James He's a "Site Reliability Czar, Google" In other words: SL65 courtesy of overvalued IPO. M. |
I love the SL65 and all, but to be perfectly honest, I could drop 30k total on a modified 2003 Mustang Cobra and have it running mid 11's.
|
jesus christ, that's stupidly fast for a stock car!!!! sub 12 at close to 120mph.... damn!
|
Sweet car, but...
According to the latest C&D article: "What you don't get with the SL65, oddly enough, is a time that is faster to 60 mph than the SL600's, a car that costs a mere $130,820. The SL600 does the deed in 3.6 seconds, the $182,720 SL65's best time was 3.8 seconds. Please don't call urging that we take competence tests. The "problem," as we've said, with the SL65 is that it doesn't have adequate traction to handle the horsepower hysteria. The rear tires have the same width as the SL600's, despite the AMG car's additional 111 horses and 148 pound-feet. All that oomph makes it nearly impossible to launch the SL65 hard without excessive wheelspin." Looks like the SL600 is still a better package despite the lack of an AMG badge & price.;) |
Originally Posted by XeroK00L
Sweet car, but...
According to the latest C&D article: "What you don't get with the SL65, oddly enough, is a time that is faster to 60 mph than the SL600's, a car that costs a mere $130,820. The SL600 does the deed in 3.6 seconds, the $182,720 SL65's best time was 3.8 seconds. Please don't call urging that we take competence tests. The "problem," as we've said, with the SL65 is that it doesn't have adequate traction to handle the horsepower hysteria. The rear tires have the same width as the SL600's, despite the AMG car's additional 111 horses and 148 pound-feet. All that oomph makes it nearly impossible to launch the SL65 hard without excessive wheelspin." Looks like the SL600 is still a better package despite the lack of an AMG badge & price.;) |
gosh now that car is pure sex on wheels! but damn for that price tag....I would definitely have to choose the Ferrari F430 :)
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:02 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands