Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Roll back emission standards

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 07:40 AM
  #61  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,631
Likes: 4,045
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
they've setup these rollbacks to be where a mere executive order cant undo it, it would have to go through the whole legislative process. The longer the public gets a taste of better/cheaper vehicles the harder it will be to go back.
Wait and see. What can be easily done can be easily undone.

In any event it doesn't matter, we are one country and our standards even with these regulations that were in place are not the strictest.
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 07:46 AM
  #62  
tex2670's Avatar
tex2670
Lexus Champion
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,041
Likes: 98
From: Southeastern PA
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
The problem is that too many Americans, in their diesel-thinking, are stuck in the past. Older Americans remember the awful 1970s passenger-car diesels, from companies like VW and Isuzu, and the even worse diesel 5.7L V8 from GM in the early 80s.
Your view of "older Americans" is getting skewed. I'm in my 50s and never had any first-hand experience with any of these vehicles because I got my DL in the mid 1980s. The only reason I have any clue about this history is because I was in a small subset of teens that followed cars and subscribed to C&D. I don't consider myself an "older American" yet, but I'm getting close. If I mentioned this to any of my contemporaries, none of them would have any clue.

You are a student of automotive history, and have a vast knowledge of these things--you are in a very small minority of people. Non-car people (most people) don't know and, frankly, don't care.

Last edited by tex2670; Dec 7, 2025 at 08:06 AM.
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 08:02 AM
  #63  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,631
Likes: 4,045
From: Maryland
Default

Exactly, the 70s was 50 years ago lol, people who were driving in the 70s are getting to be in their 70s. First hand experience isn't driving this
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 09:41 AM
  #64  
ChattanoogaPhil's Avatar
ChattanoogaPhil
Instructor
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2025
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 183
Default

Whether one argues that oil has liberated humanity from the shadows or anticipates that its continued use will result in an irreversible descent into the abyss; dismisses past predictions in the 1970s of only 35 years of oil remaining on Earth while clinging to projections of another 50, 100 or more years remaining… none of it matters.

Earth will never ‘run out of oil’. However, there will come a time when oil largely becomes less economically viable and dependable compared to alternatives. When these conditions are predominantly met, it will be the end time for oil. What is currently transpiring is the government’s withdrawal from perpetrating the illusion that time is imminent via absurd CAFE standards, EV mandates and all the rest.

Understand that if not a single drop of oil is burning Malthusian-like doomsayers will continue screaming about the depletion of other resources and the detrimental impact on the planet resulting in our demise. It is an industry.

Last edited by ChattanoogaPhil; Dec 8, 2025 at 07:58 AM.
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 09:48 AM
  #65  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,631
Likes: 4,045
From: Maryland
Default

At the end of the day cafe standards and emissions regulations have really improved our lives. Air is much more breathable now in cities and other congested areas vs 30 years ago directly due to emissions regulations of vehicles. Consumers overwhelmingly cite that fuel economy is one of the top if not the top most important factor when selecting a car...so this is a rare occurrence where Government mandates for efficiency and consumer desire actually align.

Like everything else though, there is a compromise that needs to be reached.
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 10:09 AM
  #66  
4TehNguyen's Avatar
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26,218
Likes: 79
From: Houston, Texas
Default

vehicle emissions has dropped something like 98% since the 1970s, how much are we prepared to pay to chase those last couple %? This was due to Clean Air Act, but not CAFE. Many fuel efficient vehicles will continue to exist even after this reduction back to 35 mpg. One big thing that was eliminated was the stupid EPA waiver given to Cali that essentially let Cali create emissions rules for the country outside of the legistlative process. Without the waiver, state emission rules could not supercede federal emission rules.
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 10:09 AM
  #67  
RNM GS3's Avatar
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 8,206
Likes: 249
From: New York
Default

I think for low volume models - say less than 25k per year, there should be no emissions restrictions. Ferrari, McLaren etc shouldn’t be forced to make complex engines to meet some arbitrary figure.

For volume models - yes there should be some minimum requirements. But what it has turned into is unrealistic demands on automakers which has compromised reliability and increased pricing.

Last edited by RNM GS3; Dec 7, 2025 at 10:11 AM.
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 10:11 AM
  #68  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,631
Likes: 4,045
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
vehicle emissions has dropped something like 98% since the 1970s, how much are we prepared to pay to chase those last couple %? This was due to Clean Air Act, but not CAFE. Many fuel efficient vehicles will continue to exist even after this reduction back to 35 mpg. One big thing that was eliminated was the stupid EPA waiver given to Cali that essentially let Cali create emissions rules for the country outside of the legistlative process. Without the waiver, state emission rules could not supercede federal emission rules.
I think that’s a legitimate viewpoint. However, that reduction is because of emissions regulations so you can’t fault them across the board.

CAFE standards have dramatically improved fuel economy which most consumers highly value.
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 10:27 AM
  #69  
4TehNguyen's Avatar
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26,218
Likes: 79
From: Houston, Texas
Default

yea but now CAFE requirements are going into unreasonable targets. Back in the 1980s car companies were already exceeding the CAFE targets because early on it barely crept up. Then it started getting ridiculous after 2010. Dont forget about the silly footprint formula that makes smaller cars have higher targets than a larger vehicle, basically making the market lean towards SUVs and trucks. Its the reason why midsize trucks cant compete with full size.


Last edited by 4TehNguyen; Dec 7, 2025 at 10:28 AM.
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 10:54 AM
  #70  
LeX2K's Avatar
LeX2K
Lexus Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 25,992
Likes: 4,312
From: Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
vehicle emissions has dropped something like 98% since the 1970s, how much are we prepared to pay to chase those last couple %?
Overall emissions have not dropped 98% CO, NOx and particulates fit in the ~98% category that's about it. I'd have to check but CO2 is probably higher. Ammonia and nitrous oxide are still a big problem with car exhaust and that won't change.

Also what very often gets overlooked is particulates from tire and break pad wear.
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 11:06 AM
  #71  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,631
Likes: 4,045
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
yea but now CAFE requirements are going into unreasonable targets. Back in the 1980s car companies were already exceeding the CAFE targets because early on it barely crept up. Then it started getting ridiculous after 2010. Dont forget about the silly footprint formula that makes smaller cars have higher targets than a larger vehicle, basically making the market lean towards SUVs and trucks. Its the reason why midsize trucks cant compete with full size.

I don’t disagree, that’s why I said there needs to be a compromise.

BUT, every cafe standard was thought to be unreasonable until it became reality.
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 11:12 AM
  #72  
LeX2K's Avatar
LeX2K
Lexus Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 25,992
Likes: 4,312
From: Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
BUT, every cafe standard was thought to be unreasonable until it became reality.
Truth. Automakers screamed new regulations would put them out of business.
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 11:21 AM
  #73  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,631
Likes: 4,045
From: Maryland
Default

Exactly, and they never have.
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 02:33 PM
  #74  
4TehNguyen's Avatar
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26,218
Likes: 79
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Here is a glimpse at what some of these regulations have cost the consumers in terms of price and choice. There will be a horsepower and price war in the next couple years in the industry. Some companies are able to go gloves off moreso than others.

2024 Durango with the 5.7 Hemi started $51k, now starting $43k for 2026MY
2024 Durango 392 was $86k fully loaded, now starting $50k, so $60k with full options for 2026MY?
2024 Durango Hellcat starting $103.5k, now starting $80k 2026MY
They just added back the 3.6 V6 pentastar to the Durango line for $39k

Sure the Durango is old, but find me a brand new 3 row SUV with a V6/V8 for $38-43k. The 2026 Grand Highlander starts at 43k and the Highlander starts 46k and you have to roll the dice with turbo 4 engine. It is still a good option for a budget minded buyer in a market of escalating vehicle prices.


2024 392 Wrangler Final Editions were going for $100k, now 2026 Wrangler MOAB 392s are starting $80k. Imagine how much CAFE penalties were put on a 392 Wrangler which has a smaller vehicle footprint, non aerodynamic body, and big V8. How could a company even forecast what to sell such a vehicle at when you want to sell as many as you can to make it worth it but dont sell too many to harm the fleet average and misforecast the price vs units sold vs CAFE penalties. Then take into account carbon credits that had to be purchased.
Old Dec 7, 2025 | 03:22 PM
  #75  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,631
Likes: 4,045
From: Maryland
Default

Consumers by and large just don't care. Enthusiasts care about engines like that but consumers really don't. When you adjust vehicle prices for inflation thats the thing, they actually aren't more expensive. Thats why the Highlander/Grand Highlander dramatically outsells the Durango and will continue to.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:22 AM.