Originally Posted by Motorola
(Post 11506055)
I appreciate it but I think I can speak for myself. There's no need to get personal over a black D pillar lol.
Neither is the TX but it, the Infiniti, and a boatlaod of other vehicles sure as heck wants that association. Like the Ford, it was a decision fully conscious of the design signature of the Range Rover and what it represented (prestige). Black D pillar is a Range Rover design signature, like the kidney grilles of a BMW- that's really not up for debate. |
Originally Posted by SW17LS
(Post 11506089)
exactly…
I just don’t think of black d pillars as that iconic. Lots of vehicles have them that don’t have any design orientation towards a Range Rover. It’s a desire to make the whole rear window and side windows look like one wraparound piece. Now all black d, c and A pillars I think you have a much better argument. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.clu...cb52be9af.jpeg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.clu...1b1aa1107.jpeg |
@SW17LS Case in point.:) I've been well aware of passive aggressive comments indirectly referring to me over the years and although I didn't directly address them out of diplomacy, I kept a mental note and just treaded softly, to keep the peace. I can read between the lines very well, but skate past much of it.
We've both said enough and should just focus back on the subject matter. It's unfortunate it had to degenerate to this in the first place, which says more than enough... |
It is unfortunate you chose to drag the thread here I agree. Just talk about the subject matter and not about other people and you won’t cause something like this again. Remember opinions are opinions, yours included.
We’re passionate about cars and we enjoy debating about them. We can handle ourselves. |
Originally Posted by SW17LS
(Post 11506099)
We’re passionate about cars and we enjoy debating about them. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.clu...260beef15.jpeg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.clu...940eba8d4.jpeg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.clu...14949476e.jpeg |
@SW17LS :)...
@Rest of The Thread For most of us who don't have an unconditional inside line to Toyota, those trademarks mentioned above are a great way to keep up with new models indeed. Gerben Law Firm database is much better to navigate than the USPTO, which can turn into headache for me really quick. I really love it when many of us on here can find out for ourselves what's coming down the line, than depending on news sources to determine that for us all. We all can do much better than they can in the first place, as it's as if they don't care about the brand to exercise due diligence. I'm really curious about TX 550h+. While we've seen 450h+ below it, the naturally aspirated Dynamic Force A25A 2.5L I4 turned into PHEV, is this possibly the first application of turbocharged PHEV from Toyota? I think so, but we'll see how that is. Side note: Design patent databases are a treasure trove of trivia for me at least regarding other automakers. So many "secrets" hidden in plain sight! |
Originally Posted by SW17LS
(Post 11506086)
Then why not stop posting here if the place is so terrible? We won’t miss you.
how about we get back to the tx and leave the who's right and wrong aside. most of things here are just opinions, no right or wrong. |
Originally Posted by bitkahuna
(Post 11506133)
come now, you don't speak for everyone (we) and rather than suggest carmaker1 not post, how about let them decide?
how about we get back to the tx and leave the who's right and wrong aside. most of things here are just opinions, no right or wrong. And yes, peoples opinions are not right or wrong, that was my point. |
Originally Posted by Motorola
(Post 11506055)
Neither is the TX but it, the Infiniti, and a boatlaod of other vehicles sure as heck wants that association. Like the Ford, it was a decision fully conscious of the design signature of the Range Rover and what it represented (prestige). Black D pillar is a Range Rover design signature, like the kidney grilles of a BMW- that's really not up for debate.
|
Its very clear in the latest QX60, the Aviator, the last couple generations of Explorers that they are trying to make them look like Range Rovers....I doubt the TX will be that way...
|
Originally Posted by SW17LS
(Post 11506157)
Its very clear in the latest QX60, the Aviator, the last couple generations of Explorers that they are trying to make them look like Range Rovers....I doubt the TX will be that way...
The Explorer from a few years ago looked like a RR, attractive SUV actually. There is a smaller Ford crossover that looks a little like a Lamborghini Urus from the front if you only catch a brief look. |
Its not a vehicle designed for you, its a vehicle designed for me lol, the TX is something Lexus has needed in their lineup for a long time.
|
Originally Posted by bitkahuna
(Post 11503291)
T for THIRD row?
"T" for "Third" row. |
Originally Posted by SW17LS
(Post 11506167)
Its not a vehicle designed for you, its a vehicle designed for me lol, the TX is something Lexus has needed in their lineup for a long time.
I hope to be pleasantly surprised, however. |
Originally Posted by AJT123
(Post 11506173)
I agree but not if it's crappy and uncompetitive compared to competition. From what I've seen I don't think it's going to blow anyone's minds..
I hope to be pleasantly surprised, however. Now the RX350L, THAT was crappy and uncompetitive. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands