Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Next generation BMW 7-Series details starting to leak

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #16  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 94,472
Likes: 252
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
I agree. I do however applaud Nissan and Toyota for stepping up to the plate and providing high performance engines that *also* get good fuel economy. The IS-F's engine comes to mind, as does the G37's engine.
.........as do some hybrid powertrains as well. Some of them are now performance-oriented.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 09:27 PM
  #17  
Nextourer's Avatar
Nextourer
Lexus Champion
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 3
From: none
Default

Originally Posted by doug_999
That's direct injection at play....(at least for the Toyota products)....
At least BMW has had Valvetronic for a one and double VANOS. Two things Toyota just recently launched in their engines. (Valvematic and dual VVT-i respectively.)
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 10:09 PM
  #18  
Och's Avatar
Och
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,007
Likes: 238
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by Nextourer
At least BMW has had Valvetronic for a one and double VANOS. Two things Toyota just recently launched in their engines. (Valvematic and dual VVT-i respectively.)
AFAIK, double vanos is a copy of Honda's VTEK, just like the VVTi is.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 10:17 PM
  #19  
encore888's Avatar
encore888
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,695
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Most of all with the new 7-series, I hope that the first car to introduce the I-Drive will now be the first one to get rid if it.
Somebody had to say it!

IMO that system will not be missed. However, they should replace it with something that is simplified and streamlined, just not maddening!
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 10:28 PM
  #20  
GSteg's Avatar
GSteg
Rookie
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,018
Likes: 81
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Och
AFAIK, double vanos is a copy of Honda's VTEK, just like the VVTi is.



Honda's VTEC engages at a certain RPM where as the VVTi system is enabled depending on the oil pressure level. Both of these systems only control the intake valve side. BMW's double vanos operate on both the intake and exhaust side of the cylinder head, and the lift and duration varies depending on the throttle position and revs.

They have the same function, but the design itself are not copies at all.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 11:10 PM
  #21  
picus's Avatar
picus
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: ON
Default

Well if the 7 goes FI like the 3 and 5 than fuel economy will definitely improve. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the N54 has a very good mpg to power ratio in relation to its competition, no?

Oh, and not to go off topic; but the VQ is notorious for poor consumption; even the G37 which finally got variable valve timing is among the lowest mpg in it's class. Blame the lack of direct injection for that.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 12:12 AM
  #22  
MR_F1's Avatar
MR_F1
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by Nextourer
At least BMW has had Valvetronic for a one and double VANOS. Two things Toyota just recently launched in their engines. (Valvematic and dual VVT-i respectively.)
And without Valvematic, Toyota/Lexus engines still have better economy...... Imagine the possibilities when it is applied to the 2GR and 2UR engines.

Originally Posted by Och
AFAIK, double vanos is a copy of Honda's VTEK, just like the VVTi is.
Valvetronic in NOT a copy of Vtec, nor is VVTi. Of that group VVTi and [i]Vtec are the most similar, but all are implemented in different ways and valvetronic w/ VANOS is quite a bit more advanced than VTEC.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #23  
TRDFantasy's Avatar
TRDFantasy
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
From: A better place
Default

Originally Posted by doug_999
That's direct injection at play....(at least for the Toyota products)....
Far more than direct injection at play, especially with the IS-F's engine. For one thing, the IS-F engine has a super-light valvetrain, much lighter than any other Lexus engine. Other automakers use gasoline direct injection too, but they can't seem to achieve high performance and good fuel economy at the same time.

Originally Posted by picus
Well if the 7 goes FI like the 3 and 5 than fuel economy will definitely improve. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the N54 has a very good mpg to power ratio in relation to its competition, no?

Oh, and not to go off topic; but the VQ is notorious for poor consumption; even the G37 which finally got variable valve timing is among the lowest mpg in it's class. Blame the lack of direct injection for that.
Yes, the N54 does get very good mpg for it's power output. We shall see how the competition responds.

The VQ *was* notorious for poor fuel consumption, but the newest VQ (in the G37) changes that. It uses VVEL which is basically an electronically-controlled valve lift system that does a similar function as Valvetronic, except it's more reliable and can withstand higher RPMs. Toyota has their own system (Valvematic) and Honda is due to release their system (A-VTEC) in 2009. These systems increase HP and fuel economy at the same time.

The VQ engines for years now have had variable valve timing. You got confused with variable valve lift.

FYI, the G37's fuel economy is very close to the IS350 despite being more powerful, having slightly higher curb weight, and using 5 speed auto compared to IS350's 6 speed.

Originally Posted by MR_F1
And without Valvematic, Toyota/Lexus engines still have better economy...... Imagine the possibilities when it is applied to the 2GR and 2UR engines.
Valvematic will have an even greater benefit when combined with direct injection.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 09:09 AM
  #24  
doug_999's Avatar
doug_999
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,854
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by encore888
Somebody had to say it!

IMO that system will not be missed. However, they should replace it with something that is simplified and streamlined, just not maddening!
Guys, I don't see BMW getting rid of I-Drive in the near future. Improving it yes, getting rid of it no - the fact is OWNERS like it!
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 09:14 AM
  #25  
doug_999's Avatar
doug_999
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,854
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by MR_F1
And without Valvematic, Toyota/Lexus engines still have better economy...... Imagine the possibilities when it is applied to the 2GR and 2UR engines.
They do? Can you provide specifics please?
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 09:16 AM
  #26  
LOL!'s Avatar
LOL!
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Default

Originally Posted by doug_999
Guys, I don't see BMW getting rid of I-Drive in the near future. Improving it yes, getting rid of it no - the fact is OWNERS like it!
Exactly. I think it's great...it might take time getting used to but myself and other owners like it.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 10:00 AM
  #27  
cjf_moraga's Avatar
cjf_moraga
Rookie
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Nothing wrong conceptually with the concept of a unified controller - just the execution of iDrive is very non-intuitive to most... (It certainly was when I used it) The price for BMW of being a pioneer... The new Mercedes controller in my S600 is far easier to use... I think they got the balance right...

...interesting looking at all the manufacturers at the SF Autoshow the other day... Lexus is starting to stand out as the main luxury manufacturer that has not implemented anything like this... Given the sheer amount of functionalty available the LS looks somewhat anachronistic with all the buttons and switches all over the place... (IMO of course)

Worst execution must be Infiniti where you have to physically stretch to the dash to use the rotary controller... In that sense BMW/Mercedes/Audi are superior ergonomically in that the controller is immediately under-hand while you are in a relaxed position... Though Lexus has the touch screen I also find that ergonomically awkward to lean over to touch on our RX330...

Chris
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 10:59 AM
  #28  
G Star's Avatar
G Star
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,973
Likes: 48
From: California
Default

I believe most of what BMW is claiming but if they claim the new 7 will be better than the LS600h and cheaper, I will not believe it is cheaper because BMW is most definitely always more expensive than Lexus.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 11:39 AM
  #29  
picus's Avatar
picus
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: ON
Default

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy
FYI, the G37's fuel economy is very close to the IS350 despite being more powerful, having slightly higher curb weight, and using 5 speed auto compared to IS350's 6 speed.
Is that real world or manufacturer reported? Just wondering, afaik the G37 owners are getting 17-21mpg or so, sometimes less, very rarely more.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 11:46 AM
  #30  
RFFG's Avatar
RFFG
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Interesting...let's wait and see...
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:48 AM.