SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)

2002 vs 2003 Suspension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-03, 07:14 AM
  #1  
Jayson
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Jayson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 696
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default 2002 vs 2003 Suspension

I spoke with a guy in our office parking lot the other day as he got out of his SC430 and asked him how he liked it. He couldn't say enough nice things about the car, though he did have one reservation. He said that he has now gone through his 6th tire on the car and he only has 21k miles on it. He said his is a 2002 and that his daughter, who drives a 2003, still has on her original tires at 17k miles on it. He says the suspension is weak in the 2002 and was corrected in the 2003 models. At $340 a tire he says that it's more frustrating than anything. I confimed he has the run-flats and was surprised to hear such low-mileage use coming from them. I understand the sales brochure says that owners should expect to get 20k miles or less on them, but good grief 6 tires in 1.5 years is a bit much. Any of you agree with him?

Thanks,
Old 11-19-03, 07:43 AM
  #2  
rcf8000
Pole Position
 
rcf8000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My wife's SC430 has 19,000 miles on the original run-flats, and they still look good. And almost all the driving has been on city streets. I'm amazed, frankly. The car was one of the first ones delivered in the US.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
riknchar
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
17
11-18-15 12:50 PM
TLW
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
8
03-21-06 06:04 PM
ceboyd
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
14
09-16-03 09:34 AM
Stanman
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
7
07-02-03 08:51 AM
gandro
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
9
03-29-02 10:43 PM



Quick Reply: 2002 vs 2003 Suspension



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:01 AM.