SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)

Were the first SC430's in 2001 handbuilt ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-09, 09:46 AM
  #1  
tromly
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
tromly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 3,426
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Were the first SC430's in 2001 handbuilt ?

Is this just a rumor or were the models in Aug-Dec 2001 truly built by hand. Just curious, perhaps other SC owners have wondered about the same thing. Any input would be greatly appreciated
Old 11-09-09, 01:47 PM
  #2  
PhilipMSPT
Cycle Savant
iTrader: (5)
 
PhilipMSPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In rehab...
Posts: 21,527
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Depends on which parts.

The leather stitching, the wood polishing, and some fine tuning measurements were done by hand (and it still is).

Otherwise, the car is still built, assembled, painted, and processed by machine.
Old 11-09-09, 01:52 PM
  #3  
tromly
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
tromly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 3,426
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PhilipMSPT
Depends on which parts.

The leather stitching, the wood polishing, and some fine tuning measurements were done by hand (and it still is).

Otherwise, the car is still built, assembled, painted, and processed by machine.
Thanks for the info
Old 11-09-09, 04:47 PM
  #4  
velocity12
Driver
 
velocity12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: va
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Just for point of information - weren't the first SCs assembled in Jan. 01?
Old 11-09-09, 06:08 PM
  #5  
PHXSC
Lead Lap
 
PHXSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I don't see much of a distinction between the 2. Automobile assembly lines are still manned by humans, with lifting assist machines and such, but most of the true assembly is done by hand. Hand built, in this case may mean the first several cars that were built prior to firing up the assembly line, although these cars would likely be the first to go down the assembly line to work out the issues, if any, with the assembly process.

I would view these cars neutrally, as they receive more attention to detail, but they're also subject to making mods to get things to fit, finish, function, etc., that would be incorporated in cars produced later in the assembly year, and those mods would be SOP.

I would guess we've all heard, "don't buy the first (of anything) - let them get the bugs out", and I've always applied that to cars, until I saw the first Ford Thunderbird ever produced fetch major bucks at Barrett-Jackson.....

It would be interesting to see if serial #1 SC430, which is probably in Japan, or at least the first car to be imported into the U.S., would fetch more. I doubt it. If you want exclusive, get a Neiman Marcus car that has a verifiable build number.
Old 11-10-09, 02:22 AM
  #6  
tromly
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
tromly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 3,426
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by velocity12
Just for point of information - weren't the first SCs assembled in Jan. 01?
,my bad, it was Jan01, not Aug 01,good catch
Old 11-10-09, 02:28 AM
  #7  
tromly
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
tromly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 3,426
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PHXSC
I don't see much of a distinction between the 2. Automobile assembly lines are still manned by humans, with lifting assist machines and such, but most of the true assembly is done by hand. Hand built, in this case may mean the first several cars that were built prior to firing up the assembly line, although these cars would likely be the first to go down the assembly line to work out the issues, if any, with the assembly process.

I would view these cars neutrally, as they receive more attention to detail, but they're also subject to making mods to get things to fit, finish, function, etc., that would be incorporated in cars produced later in the assembly year, and those mods would be SOP.

I would guess we've all heard, "don't buy the first (of anything) - let them get the bugs out", and I've always applied that to cars, until I saw the first Ford Thunderbird ever produced fetch major bucks at Barrett-Jackson.....

It would be interesting to see if serial #1 SC430, which is probably in Japan, or at least the first car to be imported into the U.S., would fetch more. I doubt it. If you want exclusive, get a Neiman Marcus car that has a verifiable build number.
Good info, I'm with you about buying the first of any model year car, though I have two 04 RX's, which was the second generation RX. You're right about the term exclusive, only the NM were numbered, though the PB could have been, since they only built 400/yr. Perhaps NM #1 is also in Japan, interesting to find out who has it and its whereabouts.

Last edited by tromly; 11-10-09 at 02:32 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AWDGS300
2Gen GS430 / 400/ 300 Classifieds (98-05)
10
01-10-11 03:22 PM
JohnD
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
16
12-16-06 06:29 PM
Scott1258
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
18
10-19-05 08:02 PM
white01
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
4
03-19-02 03:21 PM
sleepybobcat
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
1
05-03-01 07:01 PM



Quick Reply: Were the first SC430's in 2001 handbuilt ?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:45 AM.