Supra prices "ticking" down? SC's prices "ticking" up?
#17
FAST AND THE FURIOUS YO!!!! Eh, from my understanding people like to take the N/A and single turbo them.
#18
Lead Lap
iTrader: (11)
Don't get me wrong. By no means am I say that SC's are at the price point of a Supra. But I am saying that there is a higher volume of $12k plus SC's on the market. A few years ago you would see maybe 2 high priced SC's. But now, you will see 5-6 at a time and not even raise your eyebrows.. I agree that the $12k-$15k have "some" mods, but nothing outrageous (i.e. roll cages etc.) Could it be that "We", SC owners are getting older/more mature?
#21
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (10)
you can still have most of the fun without the price tag of TT 6spd.
of course for collector value and resale the original cars will bring more but for fun its not a bad route.
#24
#25
#28
Driver
iTrader: (5)
I've noticed the drop in the price of Supra's across the board. Both TT's and NA's but less of a drop for a TT. I'm glad I went with my SC since I think it's one of the better looking cars of it's period and is up there with the Supra. People are catching on that we essentially have the same car and the prices have started to rise. I'm just glad I got mine for $500
#29
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Oregon
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I belive the last supra sold in the U.S. was in 1998 so the SC's could be "newer by many years as in 1998 a very few Supras were sold and had be on the "number of units sold" decline for years before that.
#30
LOL. I don't agree that Supras are overrated either. NA's aren't very different from SC300's, true, but Supra NA's are lighter from the factory comparable only to a stripped down SC track car. Not that such things matter when you get into turbos but it can help to a point when you're road racing.
I have checked with a couple of classic car insurance companies when I first bought my car. There are options available but only if you're willing to drive 1,500-2,000 miles a year. Or 3,000 at most. I think this was for Hagerty among others.
You need a few things to justify why it's a collector's item or "classic": in no particular order or hierarchy... production numbers, a professional appraisal, its history and/or awards as a show car, and some examples of what the cars regularly go for. Easier for Supra MKIV's than it is for SC's. Hagerty would have approved me were it not for my desire to drive more than 3,000 miles per year.
Still, give it time. Plenty of Dodges, Chryslers and Plymouths that weren't top dog Barracudas, Challengers and Chargers have appreciated in value and regularly list in publications like Hemmings Motor News. I've seen some SC's in there but not turbocharged and heavily modified ones.
I have checked with a couple of classic car insurance companies when I first bought my car. There are options available but only if you're willing to drive 1,500-2,000 miles a year. Or 3,000 at most. I think this was for Hagerty among others.
You need a few things to justify why it's a collector's item or "classic": in no particular order or hierarchy... production numbers, a professional appraisal, its history and/or awards as a show car, and some examples of what the cars regularly go for. Easier for Supra MKIV's than it is for SC's. Hagerty would have approved me were it not for my desire to drive more than 3,000 miles per year.
Still, give it time. Plenty of Dodges, Chryslers and Plymouths that weren't top dog Barracudas, Challengers and Chargers have appreciated in value and regularly list in publications like Hemmings Motor News. I've seen some SC's in there but not turbocharged and heavily modified ones.