SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Supra vs. SC300

Old 09-24-12, 09:45 PM
  #91  
jadu
live.love.laugh.lexus

iTrader: (42)
 
jadu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CALI
Posts: 11,581
Received 88 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

What was sticker price for a 97 or 98 supra? What's that price in today's money is what I'm wondering?
Old 09-24-12, 10:49 PM
  #92  
Kira X
美少女戦士セーラームーン

iTrader: (24)
 
Kira X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 東京都
Posts: 11,183
Received 408 Likes on 336 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by jadu
What was sticker price for a 97 or 98 supra? What's that price in today's money is what I'm wondering?
I heard the TT's were in the high $40,000 range, close to the price of an SC300 if I'm not mistaken. It'd probably be in the $60,000-$70,000 range I'm guessing.
Old 09-24-12, 10:53 PM
  #93  
Kira X
美少女戦士セーラームーン

iTrader: (24)
 
Kira X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 東京都
Posts: 11,183
Received 408 Likes on 336 Posts
Default

After all these years of having an SC, I'm actually considering replacing it with an NA MKIV Supra and dropping a 1UZ and W58 in it. I've been looking at SC's for sale and it seems the clean 99-00's are going for almost as much as an NA Supra.
Old 09-25-12, 12:09 PM
  #94  
jadu
live.love.laugh.lexus

iTrader: (42)
 
jadu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CALI
Posts: 11,581
Received 88 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

^^^ i found a dirt cheap NA supra for like 6.5K not running, clean title and body had dents but mostly straight. someone picked it up with the quickness.

Last edited by jadu; 09-25-12 at 12:17 PM.
Old 09-25-12, 12:15 PM
  #95  
jadu
live.love.laugh.lexus

iTrader: (42)
 
jadu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CALI
Posts: 11,581
Received 88 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jadu
What was sticker price for a 97 or 98 supra? What's that price in today's money is what I'm wondering?
Anyways, I was finally able to google it. MSRP for a supra ranged from ~$40K ('97 TT) to $52.5K ('95 TT) according to this: http://mkiv.com/specifications/sticker/retail_sales.htm
link: http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...-MkIV-Supra-TT


Using an inflation calculator from the US bureau of labor, that equates to $57,400 ('97 TT) to $79,500 ('95 TT) in 2012
link: http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm

What does 57K to 80K buy you these days? IS-F, GT-R (used) we'll see how the value of those holds up

Last edited by jadu; 09-25-12 at 12:35 PM.
Old 09-25-12, 12:50 PM
  #96  
97-SC300
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
97-SC300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 9,238
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jadu
Anyways, I was finally able to google it. MSRP for a supra ranged from ~$40K ('97 TT) to $52.5K ('95 TT) according to this: http://mkiv.com/specifications/sticker/retail_sales.htm
link: http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...-MkIV-Supra-TT


Using an inflation calculator from the US bureau of labor, that equates to $57,400 ('97 TT) to $79,500 ('95 TT) in 2012
link: http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm

What does 57K to 80K buy you these days? IS-F, GT-R (used) we'll see how the value of those holds up
Why was there such a wide gap in the pricing between 95 and 97? If anything, I'd think they were more expensive in 97 than 95. Hm...
Old 09-25-12, 01:03 PM
  #97  
jadu
live.love.laugh.lexus

iTrader: (42)
 
jadu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CALI
Posts: 11,581
Received 88 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

^^^ That was my question as well. Some guy tries to explain it in the supraforums link
Old 09-25-12, 01:08 PM
  #98  
marshall2j
Pole Position
 
marshall2j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Contrary to popular belief, the 97 and 97 models received cheaper offerings like the interior- leather quality for instance, and those headlights were actually cheaper to manufacture. Little cost cutting items plus the fact that it was a slow seller, drastically reduced the Supra's price
Old 09-25-12, 01:11 PM
  #99  
97-SC300
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
97-SC300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 9,238
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by marshall2j
Contrary to popular belief, the 97 and 97 models received cheaper offerings like the interior- leather quality for instance, and those headlights were actually cheaper to manufacture. Little cost cutting items plus the fact that it was a slow seller, drastically reduced the Supra's price
Okay.... but $12.5k difference....
Old 09-25-12, 01:41 PM
  #100  
marshall2j
Pole Position
 
marshall2j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NY
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 97-SC300
Okay.... but $12.5k difference....
Most of it is cutting the price because of crap demand
Old 09-25-12, 02:31 PM
  #101  
Kira X
美少女戦士セーラームーン

iTrader: (24)
 
Kira X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 東京都
Posts: 11,183
Received 408 Likes on 336 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by jadu
^^^ i found a dirt cheap NA supra for like 6.5K not running, clean title and body had dents but mostly straight. someone picked it up with the quickness.
That is cheap! Supras like that sale so fast.

Originally Posted by jadu
Anyways, I was finally able to google it. MSRP for a supra ranged from ~$40K ('97 TT) to $52.5K ('95 TT) according to this: http://mkiv.com/specifications/sticker/retail_sales.htm
link: http://www.supraforums.com/forum/sho...-MkIV-Supra-TT


Using an inflation calculator from the US bureau of labor, that equates to $57,400 ('97 TT) to $79,500 ('95 TT) in 2012
link: http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm

What does 57K to 80K buy you these days? IS-F, GT-R (used) we'll see how the value of those holds up
That's a crazy difference between those two years! I figured it would be in the used GTR price range.
Old 09-25-12, 02:44 PM
  #102  
Wheel_Man
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
Wheel_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Il
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I picked up all 3 of my MKIV TT's for under $22k. 1st was a 94TT 6spd. w/ 28k miles for $21,500 from a 58 yr. old woman, 2nd was a 95TT Auto w/ 57k miles for $18k and 3rd was a 94TT Auto w/ 63k miles for $18,500 that was already single, fuel, fmic, and electronics. Buddy of mine went to jail and needed to pay for his lawyer. Anyhow, my 94 6spd. had a sticker price of $49,875.00. I 've been told by many Supra gurus that Toyota was actually using much better parts on the earlier MKIV's, hence, the higher prices.

Is there any truth to it? I really don't know. I do know, that I miss my 6spd. but, I made a very nice profit on it.
Old 09-25-12, 08:04 PM
  #103  
High PSI
Advanced
iTrader: (1)
 
High PSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 655
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Supra's are worth more due to the rarity. Like someone said earlier, in the states they have "unicorn" status.

I spent 5-months in Sydney and I saw a Supra nearly every day. Nobody gave them a second look, and talking with enthusiasts, nobody thought they were particularly special. Not surprisingly I found that I could buy a low KM '00 JDM TT 6-spd for ~$16K AUD. A similar KM early Honda S2000 was nearly 30K, because they're comparatively rare as hell.

Simple psychology - people will pay to be unique.
Old 10-02-12, 12:56 PM
  #104  
SEIDO
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
SEIDO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Trufanatic, your sig is awesome LoL

"If god owned a car..."
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LionsTent
SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)
26
10-23-16 08:17 PM
henrynguyen
SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)
26
05-19-03 11:06 AM
SC300T
SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)
1
06-21-01 08:00 AM
SC300TURBO
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
3
05-21-01 01:44 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Supra vs. SC300



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:01 PM.