RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015) Discussion topics related to the 2010 - 2015 RX350 and RX450H models

RX vs 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-14, 10:45 AM
  #16  
Quadro
Lead Lap
 
Quadro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: ON
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nipponbird
The Grand Cherokee doesn't feature here on the shopping list of 4x4's in the pockets of the guys that travel up in Africa. These harsh judges of off-road ability can usually be taken seriously, cause getting stuck somewhere in Central Africa can really spoil your day.
Exactly. I always said people should spent less time reading manufacturers websites and spent more time looking at what other people actually do with the vehicles in the real world. Nobody cares about JGC or ML where real capability is required.
Old 05-17-14, 08:21 AM
  #17  
CapeDave
Pole Position
 
CapeDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: MA
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by vlad_a
It is Toyota reliability that keeps me returning to the Lexus dealership. My DD has always been a Toyota product, but we have owned other makes as well. Each non-Toyota vehicle have left a sour taste in my mouth. Dealing with repairs, even under warranty, is not something I am willing to spend my time on.
Agree totally. Being blindsided by car repairs is no fun at all. Especially in Africa, as mentioned below Come to think of it, when I was in Africa in 1969, all vehicles were Toyota. No issues at all in 2 weeks driving all over the jungles and plains. We sure did appreciate that.
Old 05-19-14, 04:22 AM
  #18  
nipponbird
Lead Lap
 
nipponbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Rep of South Africa
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by CapeDave
Agree totally. Being blindsided by car repairs is no fun at all. Especially in Africa, as mentioned below Come to think of it, when I was in Africa in 1969, all vehicles were Toyota. No issues at all in 2 weeks driving all over the jungles and plains. We sure did appreciate that.
The thing is you must see a 4x4 or any vehicle, in its interface with its environment. The Grand Cherokee and especially the Wrangler have seen brilliant upgrades to their off-road ability in the last few years, but the moment you strip a diff or something in Central Africa, the guy you phone on the satellite telephone, will tell you, you should've gone with a Toyota, cause in the first place it is known not to break down and in the second place you'll most probably find the part you need in some bush mechanic's stash.
Old 05-20-14, 04:47 PM
  #19  
ngerstman
Rookie
 
ngerstman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: nj
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Last December I was looking to upgrade from my 2005 rx330 to either the Jeep or a CPO 2011 rx350. After going on some discussion forums, was horrified by all the nightmare stories about transmission and infotainment system issues on brand new Grand Cherokees. Thought better of it and went with the 2011 CPO with 31,000 miles for $31,000. You should keep in mind that the rx should be all new for 2016 model year. You could go with a CPO for two years and then trade in for new one. There should be a lot of 2011's around coming off lease, even 2012's. Regards. Ned.
Old 05-20-14, 05:03 PM
  #20  
dwlink
Driver
 
dwlink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: MO
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just going to +1 to everything said above particularly with reliability of Chrysler vehicles. Throw in the total cost of repairs over the life of the vehicle and you can easily add 10k to the price for a GC.
Old 05-21-14, 07:53 AM
  #21  
SteveCraig
Lead Lap
 
SteveCraig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Brunswick (NB)
Posts: 502
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nipponbird
The thing is you must see a 4x4 or any vehicle, in its interface with its environment.
Worked a short term underground in a potash mine about 25 years ago.
1 ton Toyota Diesel Landcruiser was the only thing that lasted more than a couple years in the environment. It was severely hard on vehicles.
Have a flat tire ? Cost was about $ 25K to repair it.
Break every stud getting the tire off. Break the leaf springs & most other suspension components getting the spindle off. It just got better with rear suspension issue. Drive shafts, U-joints, axles etc..
Old 05-21-14, 09:32 AM
  #22  
nipponbird
Lead Lap
 
nipponbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Rep of South Africa
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SteveCraig
Worked a short term underground in a potash mine about 25 years ago.
1 ton Toyota Diesel Landcruiser was the only thing that lasted more than a couple years in the environment. It was severely hard on vehicles.
Have a flat tire ? Cost was about $ 25K to repair it.
Break every stud getting the tire off. Break the leaf springs & most other suspension components getting the spindle off. It just got better with rear suspension issue. Drive shafts, U-joints, axles etc..
Myself got the itch to head up North again. I like products from Jeep, sort of have soul. Problem is just you must think with your knocker and not your heart, when you do that. Lots of 4x4 manufactures other than Toyota, sponsor guys for trips in Africa, of course for the marketing team going along with whirring Nikons. In these cases a plane is on standby with a mechanic and lots of spare parts. With Toyota's 70-series you don't need that.
However, the guy in the US, just wanting a nice SUV, like the Grand Cherokee, have of course not the same concerns as someone, who want's to go to Mount Ruwenzori to check out the wild gorillas.
Old 05-21-14, 03:53 PM
  #23  
SteveCraig
Lead Lap
 
SteveCraig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New Brunswick (NB)
Posts: 502
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I'm getting off track here but :
Even by today's standards the old Landcruisers are unbeatable.Simple yet durable. Comfort was an after thought.
When the mine needed a waste area for equipment they cut a huge cavern in the side of the drift. Mining equipment such as loaders, drills etc. Piles & piles of 1 year old Rangers, 1 year old CJ's underneath them.
Old 05-21-14, 05:01 PM
  #24  
Mike_1GO
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
Mike_1GO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 632
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

have you looked into the redesigned Toyota highlander? better looking imo and more interior space than the RX. less expensive too..
Old 05-21-14, 08:29 PM
  #25  
bmaez
Driver
Thread Starter
 
bmaez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SC
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Still undecided. There have been some pretty decent reviews of the latest version of the Grand Cherokee although not quite as stellar as the RX. The interest in the Grand Cherokee was mainly the styling, size, towing capacity and styling. We'd pick-up the 4x4 in either Lexus or Jeep but won't find ourselves on the side of Mt. Kilimanjaro any time soon so that type of performance isn't really a deal breaker.

Chances are we'll find ourselves in a 2015 RX 350 AWD once we make the move from AZ to VA in September. Maybe even wait for the Dec to Remember sales event.....either way I'm sure you see me post in the "2015 below invoice" thread. Only thing that may screw us up is the debut of the 2016 Nissan Titan. We bought the 04 new (great truck) and have been waiting for the redesign ever since.

Jeep will still be part of the family since the 2011 IS350 AWD will be making an exit this year for the 2015 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Hydro Blue.....very sharp.

Thanks for all the input, lots of great experience here.
Old 05-21-14, 08:39 PM
  #26  
jre002
Lexus Test Driver
 
jre002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 987
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

All the rough terrain areas I've been to, including Africa and the Middle East... the 4x4 of choice by everyone are Toyotas.

95% of 4x4 vehicles are Landcruiser, Hilux, and Prado. Lexus SUVs also are popular for the rich people.

Period.
Old 05-22-14, 06:35 AM
  #27  
ngerstman
Rookie
 
ngerstman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: nj
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bmaez
Still undecided. There have been some pretty decent reviews of the latest version of the Grand Cherokee although not quite as stellar as the RX. The interest in the Grand Cherokee was mainly the styling, size, towing capacity and styling. We'd pick-up the 4x4 in either Lexus or Jeep but won't find ourselves on the side of Mt. Kilimanjaro any time soon so that type of performance isn't really a deal breaker.

Chances are we'll find ourselves in a 2015 RX 350 AWD once we make the move from AZ to VA in September. Maybe even wait for the Dec to Remember sales event.....either way I'm sure you see me post in the "2015 below invoice" thread. Only thing that may screw us up is the debut of the 2016 Nissan Titan. We bought the 04 new (great truck) and have been waiting for the redesign ever since.

Jeep will still be part of the family since the 2011 IS350 AWD will be making an exit this year for the 2015 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Hydro Blue.....very sharp.

Thanks for all the input, lots of great experience here.
I find it interesting that so many like the styling of the Grand Cherokee, I find it totally underwhelming, think it is a step back from prior designs. If you are even thinking of waiting till December you might hang on to see when the newly designed 2016 rx will be available. Or buy a cpo 2011, which is almost exactly the same as a 2014 and then trade it for the new model one two years down the road. Just a thought. Regards. Ned.
Old 05-22-14, 06:39 AM
  #28  
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joeb427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 11,670
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I love the look and ride of the Grand Cherokee over an RX but the questionable reliability and worse,the no loaner policy are turn offs for me.
Old 05-22-14, 09:09 AM
  #29  
felix168
Rookie
 
felix168's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bmaez
Anyone compare the Overland to the AWD 350? What were your thoughts and what pushed you over to Lexus?

I'm not sure if we're sold on the ECO Diesel so we were looking at the V8 but no matter the engine option they were over 50K for the AWD. I think the obvious would be the offroad capabilities would go to Jeep and I think the interior is bigger but the seats felt narrow and stiff in the leather.


Also, we're moving to VA in about 3 months so I'm a little undecided if we should wait to buy. Would I get a better deal in VA as opposed to Gilbert, AZ where tax is a little higher (8%)?

Anyone have experience with Phoenix Lexus and Jeep dealers? Earnhardt Jeep in Gilbert in particular. Probably get more wiggle room out of the Jeep.
Here is my take:
Between the 2 if you're looking for a commuter car, the RX is your one and only choice.
Between the 2 if you're looking for a play car that you might occasionally go rock climbing, sand and dirty road trails, Grand Cherokee 4WD should be considered over the RX.
Old 05-22-14, 09:28 AM
  #30  
RX330inFL
Lead Lap
 
RX330inFL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 3,999
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joeb427
I love the look and ride of the Grand Cherokee over an RX but the questionable reliability and worse,the no loaner policy are turn offs for me.
At the shops in my area if you take your Lexus in for service and the expected repair is less than 2 hours you do not receive a loaner vehicle. That time is only for the repair. It does not include the amount of time to get it into a bay nor the car wash afterwards.


Quick Reply: RX vs 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:26 PM.