3rd Gen Lexus RX hard suspension (merged threads)
#301
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am impressed with the quality of responses on this forum. Thanks to all. I wrote a couple of weeks ago about regretting buying a 2015 RX AWD (normal, not 450h or F) due to ride harshness. Update: I drove a 2015 FWD for comparison on an identical section of concrete road which serves as a good test due to "bumps." The lead mechanic of my local N. Calif. dealer suggested the FWD would be less harsh and I agree. He told me the RX loaner I had while they worked on my ES would have been FWD. I based my 2015 purchase on that experience. Perhaps the FWD has a different rear suspension than the AWD and maybe the shocks would be interchangeable with those of the AWD. (I asked the mechanic about changing my AWD suspension to the FWD on a more global basis---not just rear shocks. Answer: can't be done and prohibitedly expensive if it could.)
Putting extra weight in the rear seems promising as some writers have said the RX 450h, which is heavier in the rear, has a softer ride. I gained some improvement with tire pressure at 30 psi vs spec of 32 psi, but not enough.
I will not have more to write as I sold the RX, feeling it was better to take the loss now and save my back. I relied too much on the loaner experience and Lexus ride reputation and agree with one writer's criticism that I should have investigated more carefully, especially given a chronic back problem.
Putting extra weight in the rear seems promising as some writers have said the RX 450h, which is heavier in the rear, has a softer ride. I gained some improvement with tire pressure at 30 psi vs spec of 32 psi, but not enough.
I will not have more to write as I sold the RX, feeling it was better to take the loss now and save my back. I relied too much on the loaner experience and Lexus ride reputation and agree with one writer's criticism that I should have investigated more carefully, especially given a chronic back problem.
Last edited by bob01; 11-24-14 at 02:11 PM.
#302
I am impressed with the quality of responses on this forum. Thanks to all. I wrote a couple of weeks ago about regretting buying a 2015 RX AWD (normal, not 450h or F) due to ride harshness. Update: I drove a 2015 FWD for comparison on an identical section of concrete road which serves as a good test due to "bumps." The lead mechanic of my local N. Calif. dealer suggested the FWD would be less harsh and I agree. He told me the RX loaner I had while they worked on my ES would have been FWD. I based my 2015 purchase on that experience. Perhaps the FWD has a different rear suspension than the AWD and maybe the shocks would be interchangeable with those of the AWD. (I asked the mechanic about changing my AWD suspension to the FWD on a more global basis---not just rear shocks. Answer: can't be done and prohibitedly expensive if it could.)
Putting extra weight in the rear seems promising as some writers have said the RX 450h, which is heavier in the rear, has a softer ride. I gained some improvement with tire pressure at 30 psi vs spec of 32 psi, but not enough.
I will not have more to write as I sold the RX, feeling it was better to take the loss now and save my back. I relied too much on the loaner experience and Lexus ride reputation and agree with one writer's criticism that I should have investigated more carefully, especially given a chronic back problem.
Putting extra weight in the rear seems promising as some writers have said the RX 450h, which is heavier in the rear, has a softer ride. I gained some improvement with tire pressure at 30 psi vs spec of 32 psi, but not enough.
I will not have more to write as I sold the RX, feeling it was better to take the loss now and save my back. I relied too much on the loaner experience and Lexus ride reputation and agree with one writer's criticism that I should have investigated more carefully, especially given a chronic back problem.
On other news, in my general travels today I did not notice the harshness the way I sometimes do. Weight in the back or just warmer asphalt on the roads? Who knows?
#305
Lexus Test Driver
I am impressed with the quality of responses on this forum. Thanks to all. I wrote a couple of weeks ago about regretting buying a 2015 RX AWD (normal, not 450h or F) due to ride harshness. Update: I drove a 2015 FWD for comparison on an identical section of concrete road which serves as a good test due to "bumps." The lead mechanic of my local N. Calif. dealer suggested the FWD would be less harsh and I agree. He told me the RX loaner I had while they worked on my ES would have been FWD. I based my 2015 purchase on that experience. Perhaps the FWD has a different rear suspension than the AWD and maybe the shocks would be interchangeable with those of the AWD. (I asked the mechanic about changing my AWD suspension to the FWD on a more global basis---not just rear shocks. Answer: can't be done and prohibitedly expensive if it could.)
Putting extra weight in the rear seems promising as some writers have said the RX 450h, which is heavier in the rear, has a softer ride. I gained some improvement with tire pressure at 30 psi vs spec of 32 psi, but not enough.
I will not have more to write as I sold the RX, feeling it was better to take the loss now and save my back. I relied too much on the loaner experience and Lexus ride reputation and agree with one writer's criticism that I should have investigated more carefully, especially given a chronic back problem.
Putting extra weight in the rear seems promising as some writers have said the RX 450h, which is heavier in the rear, has a softer ride. I gained some improvement with tire pressure at 30 psi vs spec of 32 psi, but not enough.
I will not have more to write as I sold the RX, feeling it was better to take the loss now and save my back. I relied too much on the loaner experience and Lexus ride reputation and agree with one writer's criticism that I should have investigated more carefully, especially given a chronic back problem.
^^LOL very good
#306
I have done some extensive driving over the holiday. I am happy to report that I have noticed a definitive change in the harshness of the back axle with the extra weight in the back.
It makes me very happy. The car handles better enough that I am fine with any decrease in mileage. It is quite worth it.
I'll add up the exact poundage and report back tomorrow.
Maybe not a home run, but a good solid double, or maybe even a triple.
By all means, if you have this issue, give it a whirl. But be sure to use sand. Total price for 100 pounds of sand about ten or fifteen bucks. And in snow areas, you can use the sand for traction if needed
It makes me very happy. The car handles better enough that I am fine with any decrease in mileage. It is quite worth it.
I'll add up the exact poundage and report back tomorrow.
Maybe not a home run, but a good solid double, or maybe even a triple.
By all means, if you have this issue, give it a whirl. But be sure to use sand. Total price for 100 pounds of sand about ten or fifteen bucks. And in snow areas, you can use the sand for traction if needed
#307
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JT4, Regarding a replacement for the sold 15RX AWD, for the time bring I am going to continue with my 02 ES. At 100k miles, it still has a lot of life left; it is maintained regularly by Lexus. If I were to replace the ES with another ES I would go with a 2012 or earlier as 2013 onward ESs have a stiffer suspension--as does the Toyota Camry and Avalon. Ultimately I will probably buy a used LS. It comes in an AWD version but given my RX experience I would have to see if there is a ride difference with AWD.
I am starting my search with Consumer Reports (laughable, I know). They rate the ride with a symbol so there is more of an apples to apples comparison. Unfortunately ride includes body sway but each vehicle report has a narrative on "Ride" which, while not perfect for comparing stiffness, is quite helpful. They think the 2013 (+?) Lincoln MKZ ride rivals some high end European sedans and is better than the current Lexus ES. Likewise the Buick Lacrosse and Ford Fusion. The Mercedes E class may be a candidate but I think not as good a ride as the Lexus LS. The E is smaller and has better fuel economy. Mercedes S class is too large and too expensive but may have the best ride of all per Consumer Reports. The LS is a little larger than I would like but smaller than the M-B S. I can live with the LS size. bob01
I am starting my search with Consumer Reports (laughable, I know). They rate the ride with a symbol so there is more of an apples to apples comparison. Unfortunately ride includes body sway but each vehicle report has a narrative on "Ride" which, while not perfect for comparing stiffness, is quite helpful. They think the 2013 (+?) Lincoln MKZ ride rivals some high end European sedans and is better than the current Lexus ES. Likewise the Buick Lacrosse and Ford Fusion. The Mercedes E class may be a candidate but I think not as good a ride as the Lexus LS. The E is smaller and has better fuel economy. Mercedes S class is too large and too expensive but may have the best ride of all per Consumer Reports. The LS is a little larger than I would like but smaller than the M-B S. I can live with the LS size. bob01
#308
Lexus Champion
Bob, I would look for a vehicle that has double-wishbone suspension up front and back, e.g. GS350. Then, I would check for aftermarket support. I can't say enough good things about Koni components. If there's anything Europeans know how to do, it is suspension.
As I mentioned before, my IS300 has very stiff Eibach springs, but I adjusted Koni shocks to make the ride very comfortable. It amazes me how well it works each time I drive it. I will take it on a long road trip any time. Now, the STi I got has softer springs, but shocks are way too stiff. So, I'm still using my ol' IS300 as my DD.
As I mentioned before, my IS300 has very stiff Eibach springs, but I adjusted Koni shocks to make the ride very comfortable. It amazes me how well it works each time I drive it. I will take it on a long road trip any time. Now, the STi I got has softer springs, but shocks are way too stiff. So, I'm still using my ol' IS300 as my DD.
#309
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: aguadulce
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi, I am glad that I am not the only one with the same harshness problem.
I have a 2010 RX fwd and I noticed that some fwd (the first ones) comes with shock absorbers in the rear and AWD (and new FWD) comes with struts (checked sewell). I thought Lexus changed to struts to improve the ride and I was thinking of changing the rear suspension for the improved one. Then luckily I read your posts and I realized even the improved rear suspension has issues too...
I changed my shocks when I noticed the old ones were leaking oil and the ride GOT WORSE!!!
Maybe they had a break in period but I alrealdy used them for 20k miles... I think is less bumpy when it had weight in the rear but not very sure... The thing is, if your ride has shocks the only ones you can buy are the OEM ones... (48531-0E130) No aftermarket parts for them...
I have a 2010 RX fwd and I noticed that some fwd (the first ones) comes with shock absorbers in the rear and AWD (and new FWD) comes with struts (checked sewell). I thought Lexus changed to struts to improve the ride and I was thinking of changing the rear suspension for the improved one. Then luckily I read your posts and I realized even the improved rear suspension has issues too...
I changed my shocks when I noticed the old ones were leaking oil and the ride GOT WORSE!!!
Maybe they had a break in period but I alrealdy used them for 20k miles... I think is less bumpy when it had weight in the rear but not very sure... The thing is, if your ride has shocks the only ones you can buy are the OEM ones... (48531-0E130) No aftermarket parts for them...
#310
Lexus Test Driver
JT4, Regarding a replacement for the sold 15RX AWD, for the time bring I am going to continue with my 02 ES. At 100k miles, it still has a lot of life left; it is maintained regularly by Lexus. If I were to replace the ES with another ES I would go with a 2012 or earlier as 2013 onward ESs have a stiffer suspension--as does the Toyota Camry and Avalon. Ultimately I will probably buy a used LS. It comes in an AWD version but given my RX experience I would have to see if there is a ride difference with AWD.
I am starting my search with Consumer Reports (laughable, I know). They rate the ride with a symbol so there is more of an apples to apples comparison. Unfortunately ride includes body sway but each vehicle report has a narrative on "Ride" which, while not perfect for comparing stiffness, is quite helpful. They think the 2013 (+?) Lincoln MKZ ride rivals some high end European sedans and is better than the current Lexus ES. Likewise the Buick Lacrosse and Ford Fusion. The Mercedes E class may be a candidate but I think not as good a ride as the Lexus LS. The E is smaller and has better fuel economy. Mercedes S class is too large and too expensive but may have the best ride of all per Consumer Reports. The LS is a little larger than I would like but smaller than the M-B S. I can live with the LS size. bob01
I am starting my search with Consumer Reports (laughable, I know). They rate the ride with a symbol so there is more of an apples to apples comparison. Unfortunately ride includes body sway but each vehicle report has a narrative on "Ride" which, while not perfect for comparing stiffness, is quite helpful. They think the 2013 (+?) Lincoln MKZ ride rivals some high end European sedans and is better than the current Lexus ES. Likewise the Buick Lacrosse and Ford Fusion. The Mercedes E class may be a candidate but I think not as good a ride as the Lexus LS. The E is smaller and has better fuel economy. Mercedes S class is too large and too expensive but may have the best ride of all per Consumer Reports. The LS is a little larger than I would like but smaller than the M-B S. I can live with the LS size. bob01
#312
Instructor
#313
Lexus Champion
However, as Ray mentioned above, there are no direct aftermarket replacements.
#314
Hi, I am glad that I am not the only one with the same harshness problem.
I have a 2010 RX fwd and I noticed that some fwd (the first ones) comes with shock absorbers in the rear and AWD (and new FWD) comes with struts (checked sewell). I thought Lexus changed to struts to improve the ride and I was thinking of changing the rear suspension for the improved one. Then luckily I read your posts and I realized even the improved rear suspension has issues too...
I changed my shocks when I noticed the old ones were leaking oil and the ride GOT WORSE!!!
Maybe they had a break in period but I alrealdy used them for 20k miles... I think is less bumpy when it had weight in the rear but not very sure... The thing is, if your ride has shocks the only ones you can buy are the OEM ones... (48531-0E130) No aftermarket parts for them...
I have a 2010 RX fwd and I noticed that some fwd (the first ones) comes with shock absorbers in the rear and AWD (and new FWD) comes with struts (checked sewell). I thought Lexus changed to struts to improve the ride and I was thinking of changing the rear suspension for the improved one. Then luckily I read your posts and I realized even the improved rear suspension has issues too...
I changed my shocks when I noticed the old ones were leaking oil and the ride GOT WORSE!!!
Maybe they had a break in period but I alrealdy used them for 20k miles... I think is less bumpy when it had weight in the rear but not very sure... The thing is, if your ride has shocks the only ones you can buy are the OEM ones... (48531-0E130) No aftermarket parts for them...
#315
Pardon my ignorance, I am completely new to this shock absorber thing
My stupid question is: do shocks have specs like tires so that as long as we can find shocks with the same specs (length and ends?), we can replace?
My stupid question is: do shocks have specs like tires so that as long as we can find shocks with the same specs (length and ends?), we can replace?