WITH NAVIGATION OR WITHOUT?? rx 350 2010
06-08-13, 06:45 PM
#1
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ny
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WITH NAVIGATION OR WITHOUT?? rx 350 2010
I was intending on buying a 2010 rx 350 with a navigation system and am now having second thoughts. Any feedback on your experience? worth it or not? is it great or not?
06-08-13, 10:16 PM
#2
Lexus Test Driver
my iphone 5 and other smart phones have better navigation than the OEM navigation that comes with the RX.
Stand alone GPS (Garmin, Tomtom) have better screen than the RX Navi ( now, they're using glass instead of the plasticky capacitive screen).
and these stand alone GPS units, even the top of the line ones are below $400.
Since it's 2010, i'm pretty sure you will need to update it unless you're getting it from a dealer and they can update the maps for you.
However, RX 350 that have navigation usually have something else ( premium, comfort packages etc) which a Non-navi RX might be missing.
and if you plan to trade or sell the RX a few years down the road, the Navigation comes handy.
So to answer your question: Worth it or not? as a Navigation. Nope. BUT as a cleaner INFOtainment system, YES.
Is it great or not. Definitely not. and map updates are costly.
Stand alone GPS (Garmin, Tomtom) have better screen than the RX Navi ( now, they're using glass instead of the plasticky capacitive screen).
and these stand alone GPS units, even the top of the line ones are below $400.
Since it's 2010, i'm pretty sure you will need to update it unless you're getting it from a dealer and they can update the maps for you.
However, RX 350 that have navigation usually have something else ( premium, comfort packages etc) which a Non-navi RX might be missing.
and if you plan to trade or sell the RX a few years down the road, the Navigation comes handy.
So to answer your question: Worth it or not? as a Navigation. Nope. BUT as a cleaner INFOtainment system, YES.
Is it great or not. Definitely not. and map updates are costly.
Last edited by markrivers; 06-09-13 at 06:53 AM.
06-09-13, 02:15 AM
#3
Drive both, one with navigation and one without, then make your decision. I maybe in a minority, but I love the navigation/audio/climate control/destination/bluetooth/telephone/built-in dashboard system with the remote touch control.
06-09-13, 04:40 AM
#4
No, I don't play soccer!
Definitely a good suggestion David because it's not just about nav. There are other functions integrated in the screen including the back up camera. Without nav, the screen is much smaller and displays limited information. Also you get an extra storage space in place of remote touch. For directions, GPS is probably better since it can be updated frequently and costs less if not free. Lexus nav updates are behind by at least a year. It's also $300 installed. But you are not obligated to do it. Getting traffic alerts is another feature of nav. When a destination is entered, a notice will pop up if there's trouble ahead. It may change your route. That runs another $25/quarter. I recently updated nav for the first time more so for the points of interest. Roads rarely change around here. Finally there's resale consideration. A nav-equipped RX is more desirable.
06-09-13, 08:26 AM
#5
Last edited by azinn; 06-10-13 at 08:27 AM. Reason: GPS update info added.
06-09-13, 08:51 AM
#6
To answer your question. When i first bought my rx , almost every one i know asked me this question " Does it come with a nav?" I know that there are many cheaper alternate ways to navigate out there but i believe that the car comes with a factory navigation looks much better and cleaner than the one without it ( after market nav mounts on dashboard or windshield doesn't give the car a clean look at all) However, it's your money so buy what you think it's good for you.
06-09-13, 05:25 PM
#7
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: VA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a 2010 RX350 with NAV. The primary reason I purchased this car was the bi-Xenon headlights & associated characteristics. But, they only were available with the NAV package.
Trending Topics
06-09-13, 09:43 PM
#8
Originally Posted by azinn
Quote:
I would go with a Garmin or TomTom rather the factory GPS on any make or model of any car manufacture. Much more flexible and can use in any vehicle you own or rent. Just my 2 cents.
I would go with a Garmin or TomTom rather the factory GPS on any make or model of any car manufacture. Much more flexible and can use in any vehicle you own or rent. Just my 2 cents.
These questions come up all the time and to be honest, if you set out looking for a vehicle with Nav, then don't settle or you'll regret it every single time you see the ugly Garmin sitting above your dash.
Posted from ClubLexus.com App for Android
06-10-13, 05:28 AM
#9
Driver School Candidate
I initially thought about buying the non-NAV RX but a buddy of mine who buys and sells used cars for a dealership highly recommended I consider the RX with a NAV especially if my intention is to sell it in a few years. The trade-in will be higher obviously and it's an easier sell if I opted to sell privately.
Aside from that, I really like the setup/look of the NAV so I'm glad I got it.
Aside from that, I really like the setup/look of the NAV so I'm glad I got it.
06-10-13, 06:29 AM
#11
Pole Position
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I also agree that the Nav is essential in a luxury Make. I actually like my Nav, I don't know how many times my portable Magellon fell off the suction cup on my dashboard mount. I won't buy a new car without Nav.
