Hybrid vs Conventional -- Consumer Reports
#1
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hybrid vs Conventional -- Consumer Reports
Does anyone get Consumer Reports?
If so please correct me if I have the numbers wrong.
After a quick news stand reading, it looked like they had the RX 450h
gas mileage @ 15 city, 31 highway, 26 combined. They went on to conclude that the hybrid was a bad investment, costing $3000 more than the conventional RX during the course of ownership.
We've discussed the value added by the upgraded trim of the hybrid package and how this is partially recouped at resale, but the Consumer Reports conclusion is a downer. I hope I read it wrong.
If so please correct me if I have the numbers wrong.
After a quick news stand reading, it looked like they had the RX 450h
gas mileage @ 15 city, 31 highway, 26 combined. They went on to conclude that the hybrid was a bad investment, costing $3000 more than the conventional RX during the course of ownership.
We've discussed the value added by the upgraded trim of the hybrid package and how this is partially recouped at resale, but the Consumer Reports conclusion is a downer. I hope I read it wrong.
#2
Does anyone get Consumer Reports?
If so please correct me if I have the numbers wrong.
After a quick news stand reading, it looked like they had the RX 450h
gas mileage @ 15 city, 31 highway, 26 combined. They went on to conclude that the hybrid was a bad investment, costing $3000 more than the conventional RX during the course of ownership.
We've discussed the value added by the upgraded trim of the hybrid package and how this is partially recouped at resale, but the Consumer Reports conclusion is a downer. I hope I read it wrong.
If so please correct me if I have the numbers wrong.
After a quick news stand reading, it looked like they had the RX 450h
gas mileage @ 15 city, 31 highway, 26 combined. They went on to conclude that the hybrid was a bad investment, costing $3000 more than the conventional RX during the course of ownership.
We've discussed the value added by the upgraded trim of the hybrid package and how this is partially recouped at resale, but the Consumer Reports conclusion is a downer. I hope I read it wrong.
#3
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,041
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes
on
42 Posts
you dont buy a hybrid to save money in the end, that is the completely wrong reason. You buy it for the added power, the added quietness in the cabin, the eco benefits (CO2, smog), and the rareness of the vehicle
#4
Plus with the additional features and trim as standard equipment, it's a model step up to the top of the line. But there will always be those that don't get that. Both cars are great but if you look at it that way so is the Toyota Highlander. Some of us took a step 'UP'. Better mileage along with the CVT tranny and horsepower make it all worthwhile. I found a link recently that discussed how Lexus comes up with the different number designations. the '450' signifies the 'It performs like a 4.5L V8' . And yep, we do get great mileage (my '03 RX averaged 19, now I'm averaging 29+) and are greener to boot.
Last edited by Cruiter; 02-22-10 at 10:57 AM.
#5
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've really enjoyed mine so far. Fabulous machine, different road feel than my X5 but very competent. The hybrid feeds my inner geek, and the fuel savings is a bonus. Less gas is less gas, and I'm happier with the Japanese getting my dollars than those who sell us oil and hate us for buying it. What hypocrites. Hypocrites isn't the best word, but whatever they are I'm giving them less business and that feels like the right thing to do.
I still can't get used to coming into stalled traffic and watching the mileage go UP. I'm averaging 27 mpg on regular. My X5 was 18-19 mpg on premium. That change feels right, too.
The article in CR bothered me with its shallow analysis, and because I know many people will read that and think no further. Sure, CR does not accept ads so they won't be biased, but they can be unbiased and and incompetent at the same time, and often are.
Anyway, we know the truth and that's good enough.
I still can't get used to coming into stalled traffic and watching the mileage go UP. I'm averaging 27 mpg on regular. My X5 was 18-19 mpg on premium. That change feels right, too.
The article in CR bothered me with its shallow analysis, and because I know many people will read that and think no further. Sure, CR does not accept ads so they won't be biased, but they can be unbiased and and incompetent at the same time, and often are.
Anyway, we know the truth and that's good enough.
#6
I've really enjoyed mine so far. Fabulous machine, different road feel than my X5 but very competent. The hybrid feeds my inner geek, and the fuel savings is a bonus. Less gas is less gas, and I'm happier with the Japanese getting my dollars than those who sell us oil and hate us for buying it. What hypocrites. Hypocrites isn't the best word, but whatever they are I'm giving them less business and that feels like the right thing to do.
I still can't get used to coming into stalled traffic and watching the mileage go UP. I'm averaging 27 mpg on regular. My X5 was 18-19 mpg on premium. That change feels right, too.
The article in CR bothered me with its shallow analysis, and because I know many people will read that and think no further. Sure, CR does not accept ads so they won't be biased, but they can be unbiased and and incompetent at the same time, and often are.
Anyway, we know the truth and that's good enough.
I still can't get used to coming into stalled traffic and watching the mileage go UP. I'm averaging 27 mpg on regular. My X5 was 18-19 mpg on premium. That change feels right, too.
The article in CR bothered me with its shallow analysis, and because I know many people will read that and think no further. Sure, CR does not accept ads so they won't be biased, but they can be unbiased and and incompetent at the same time, and often are.
Anyway, we know the truth and that's good enough.
#7
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CR holds an interesting place in public discourse. I know people who are very educated, very intelligent, and normally very thoughtful, but they will stand by a CR recommendation despite clear and overwhelming proof that the product is a turkey, sometimes even if they hate the product. Crazy stuff.
Trending Topics
#8
Does the RX450h really preform like a v8 4.5L? I have one, but I have never pushed it to its "limits" yet. Again I have never owned a V8, so I wouldnt know what I am feeling in the first place.
#11
The 'RX' means crossover and the 450 means it acts like it's a 4.5L Lexus.
#12
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RXSF, the claim is real. That IS how Lexus does their names and numerical designations. And yes, with the CVT and new 3.5L w/electric motor addition it adds up to 295 HP. Drive one, warm it up right and pass someone on a two lane country road. I won't say sex isn't better but ......
The 'RX' means crossover and the 450 means it acts like it's a 4.5L Lexus.
The 'RX' means crossover and the 450 means it acts like it's a 4.5L Lexus.
I must say that the CVT changes the hard accelerating experience substantially. Even a very smooth shifting automatic imposes very perceptible stages to the feeling of acceleration. Not so with the CVT. I try to imagine I can feel the electrics kick in on hard sprints, but I have to honestly say I cannot.
Acceleration comes in a smooth wave and just keeps building until the laws of physics or the law of the land come into play.
Or maybe common sense.
Naw, not common sense. Never.
The machines scoots when I need it to, that's what I'm after. If I had wanted a boy racer I would have sprung for a Porsche Carrera.
#13
No, I don't play soccer!
What issue is this article in? I read CR cover to cover when I receive it and haven't seen this. Last issue was a few weeks ago. In the mail maybe?
I know I didn't save money with the 450h. That's ok with me. I was more interested in the technology and yes, being more eco friendly. I'm a city driver mostly. And there's nothing like it out there.
Fogcutter, I had to laugh when I read your comment about the 450h appealing to your inner geek. Within a day or two of picking up mine, I felt like I was driving a nerd mobile. So I named him Urkel
I know I didn't save money with the 450h. That's ok with me. I was more interested in the technology and yes, being more eco friendly. I'm a city driver mostly. And there's nothing like it out there.
Fogcutter, I had to laugh when I read your comment about the 450h appealing to your inner geek. Within a day or two of picking up mine, I felt like I was driving a nerd mobile. So I named him Urkel
The following users liked this post:
Seabone726 (02-24-20)
#14
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,041
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes
on
42 Posts
RXSF, the claim is real. That IS how Lexus does their names and numerical designations. And yes, with the CVT and new 3.5L w/electric motor addition it adds up to 295 HP. Drive one, warm it up right and pass someone on a two lane country road. I won't say sex isn't better but ......
The 'RX' means crossover and the 450 means it acts like it's a 4.5L Lexus.
The 'RX' means crossover and the 450 means it acts like it's a 4.5L Lexus.
yes, i know that this is how they name their hybrids. Im just saying a modern 4.5 liter V8 will produce way more power than 295, so lets not kid ourselves. i.e. bmw's new line of turbo V8s use a 4.4 liter to put out 400+ horsepower. my comment above was to reference american engines that usually have a big displacement but little horsepower, like the latest 4.5 liter V8 on dodge ram trucks which put out a little bit over 300 horsepower
#15
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes, i know that this is how they name their hybrids. Im just saying a modern 4.5 liter V8 will produce way more power than 295, so lets not kid ourselves. i.e. bmw's new line of turbo V8s use a 4.4 liter to put out 400+ horsepower. my comment above was to reference american engines that usually have a big displacement but little horsepower, like the latest 4.5 liter V8 on dodge ram trucks which put out a little bit over 300 horsepower
Last edited by JB330Ci; 02-22-10 at 08:00 PM.