So I didn't get the new lexus RX-350... - Page 4

The G Man · 10-30-09, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by data2009

It seems like every time someone posts something negative on this RX forum, some members who do not own RX, not researching an entry level Lexus grocery getter, jump on every negative experience and pass their 'facts', mostly based on internet articles, as truth. On other forums, they are called trolls. On this forum, they are called true car enthusiasts. Done here. If Mods are reading this, can someone add an 'ignore' button to the list of desired enhancements for vBulletin's next release, please?

So the OP which had a 06 RX and just recently traded it in is a troll just because he did not tarde it in for a 2010 RX

The G Man · 11-02-09, 08:27 AM

The 2010 RX350 might have a tad bit stiffer suspension, but I would hardly say it is design for those who enjoy more spirited driving

DNC · 11-02-09, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The G Man

The 2010 RX350 might have a tad bit stiffer suspension, but I would hardly say it is design for those who enjoy more spirited driving

G Man, I agree the RX is not for those who desire a more spirited driving experience. It's still very much a car targeted more towards females and older drivers with it's soft ride. But a softer ride is what we were looking for

.

The G Man · 11-03-09, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DNC

G Man, I agree the RX is not for those who desire a more spirited driving experience. It's still very much a car targeted more towards females and older drivers with it's soft ride. But a softer ride is what we were looking for

.

A lot of people prefer a softer ride, thats why the RX out sells all other midsize luxury SUV. The 2010 RX I test drove handle better than our old RX330,but compare to the competition, it is not design for spirited driving. Not that there is anything wrong with that, because the RX350 excels in many other area.

DaRacerz · 11-03-09, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The G Man

A lot of people prefer a softer ride, thats why the RX out sells all other midsize luxury SUV. The 2010 RX I test drove handle better than our old RX330,but compare to the competition, it is not design for spirited driving. Not that there is anything wrong with that, because the RX350 excels in many other area.

Couldn't say it better myself. Some of us aren't situated about have a sport car out of an suv. Just simply want comfortable, quiet and relaxing ride to the destination. Don't want to be man power a steering wheel or listening to exhaust on a 3 hr trip. Just want to be at the destination relaxed and ready to do business, and this is where Lexus excels. To me the sportier ride is a deterrent as long as the car isn't "mushy soft".

data2009 · 11-04-09, 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaRacerz

Couldn't say it better myself. Some of us aren't situated about have a sport car out of an suv. Just simply want comfortable, quiet and relaxing ride to the destination. Don't want to be man power a steering wheel or listening to exhaust on a 3 hr trip. Just want to be at the destination relaxed and ready to do business, and this is where Lexus excels. To me the sportier ride is a deterrent as long as the car isn't "mushy soft".

I do not understand why the phrase "spirited driving" gets automatically rebranded into a "sportier ride". You prefer 'ECO' driving in SUV, no problem (the nick could've foolled me). Drive it as an appliance, or a grocery getter, sure, why not. Never plan on taking it above 65, again - your choice. Just do not assign labels to the car based on personal driving preferences. Car does not make the driver. The driver makes the car. As long as the car isn't "mush soft", I agree.

I find RX10 capable enough to fit my driving style, which I consider more aggressive than an average driver - something I found missing in all previous RX models I test-drove ('01, '05, '08). But I do not always drive it like the sky is falling. There are faster and more suited cars for that. I often do enjoy a quite ride from A to B, or on the long family trips. The point is RX10 does both relatively well. Plus, it offers advanced technology and traditional (argumentive) Lexus traits.

DNC · 11-04-09, 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaRacerz

Couldn't say it better myself. Some of us aren't situated about have a sport car out of an suv. Just simply want comfortable, quiet and relaxing ride to the destination. Don't want to be man power a steering wheel or listening to exhaust on a 3 hr trip. Just want to be at the destination relaxed and ready to do business, and this is where Lexus excels. To me the sportier ride is a deterrent as long as the car isn't "mushy soft".

Mark and G Man, I agree. The RX isn't a performance vehicle. It reminds me of a Cadillac Fleetwood my family ordered in the 1980's in that it is not meant for speed or handling like a BMW, instead what it does best is give you a degree of comfort and isolates you from the road. I like that. If I had wanted performance I would have bought with the Audi.

The G Man · 11-04-09, 08:12 AM

I think Audi have a combination of handling and comfort. BMW is too stiff for me. The RX has a great ride and accelerate nicely on the highway, but as soon you make some high speed maneuvers, you know you are not in a BMW.

sophos · 11-04-09, 12:50 PM

Cars are designed for different uses. I think the RX is great for long daily commutes, running errands, and long trips since it balances well a quiet, relaxing atmosphere and decent carrying capacity.

It isn't the best for an intense driving experience on winding mountain roads, but I don't do that very often. If that was a major focus for me, I'd get a second car for that and it would probably be a Mazda Miata, or if I was wealthy an Audi R8.

TRDFantasy · 11-06-09, 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The G Man

I think Audi have a combination of handling and comfort. BMW is too stiff for me. The RX has a great ride and accelerate nicely on the highway, but as soon you make some high speed maneuvers, you know you are not in a BMW.

Just curious. have you actually driven the 2010 RX yourself, or are you basing your opinions on internet chatter?

The 3rd gen RX has a double-wishbone rear suspension, which no generation of RX ever had before. Most reviews say the new RX handles quite nicely, including "high speed" maneuvers.

The G Man · 11-06-09, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy

Just curious. have you actually driven the 2010 RX yourself, or are you basing your opinions on internet chatter?

The 3rd gen RX has a double-wishbone rear suspension, which no generation of RX ever had before. Most reviews say the new RX handles quite nicely, including "high speed" maneuvers.

The 2010 RX was on our short list of test drive cars 2 months ago. I agree with the reviewers, the new RX handles quite nicely, unfortunately, there is alway the word "BUT" at the end of every review I have read about the RX's handling. For me, the word " BUT " means better handling than last gen, but still behind most of the competition.

TRDFantasy · 11-06-09, 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The G Man

The 2010 RX was on our short list of test drive cars 2 months ago. I agree with the reviewers, the new RX handles quite nicely, unfortunately, there is alway the word "BUT" at the end of every review I have read about the RX's handling. For me, the word " BUT " means better handling than last gen, but still behind most of the competition.

Most of the competition, with maybe the exception of the Audi Q5, also can't compare to the RX's overall refinement, ride quality and comfort. Combine that with decent handling, the RX has a ride/handling compromise that is quite hard to beat.

Most of the competing vehicles that offer better handling either have a stiffer ride than the RX, or the ride is more busy and nervous over rough roads.

I forgot to mention the 3rd gen RX has far more laser seam welds on the chassis than any previous generation RX. The 3rd gen RX therefore has a more rigid chassis than any other RX, also contributing to better ride and handling. Several reviews have mentioned how solid and composed the 3rd gen RX feels compared to previous generations.

The G Man · 11-06-09, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRDFantasy

Most of the competition, with maybe the exception of the Audi Q5, also can't compare to the RX's overall refinement, ride quality and comfort. Combine that with decent handling, the RX has a ride/handling compromise that is quite hard to beat.

Most of the competing vehicles that offer better handling either have a stiffer ride than the RX, or the ride is more busy and nervous over rough roads.

I forgot to mention the 3rd gen RX has far more laser seam welds on the chassis than any previous generation RX. The 3rd gen RX therefore has a more rigid chassis than any other RX, also contributing to better ride and handling. Several reviews have mentioned how solid and composed the 3rd gen RX feels compared to previous generations.

without a doubt the RX has refinement and rate high on ride quality and comfort. It was my wife's decision to make, and my input was to buy the RX because of dealer service and reliability, but like most of my suggestions, she ignore me

The G Man · 11-04-09, 01:56 PM

sophos, I agree. If one is looking for a point A to point B luxury SUV that is quiet and smooth. The RX cannot be beat.

smsprague · 11-06-09, 11:01 AM

G Man,

Same thing happened to me. I recommended that my wife get the 450h, but she ignored me and went with an Acura MDX.