That big gap on new RX330 grill looks bad
#1
Pole Position
Thread Starter
That big gap on new RX330 grill looks bad
Just came back from the Chicago car show and saw the new RX330 there. One thing I and a number of spectators there noticed is a big gap (guessing 1.5" high) between the bottom of the grill and the top of the bumper that extends the entire length of the grill. Don't remember seeing this gap on current RX or other Lexus vehicles. I'm sure it is not a flaw but part of the design but sure seems totally out of place when the rest of the SUV shows such fine fit. The Lexus rep there said quite a few people noticed that gap and commented on it. Have you guys who saw this new RX330 noticed this gap?
#2
Lexus Diva
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 6,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Please keep in mind that auto show cars are prototype vehicles and sometimes do not reflect "fit & finish" 100%.....and if that is the ONLY issue the new RX330 has, I'm sure many people would be more than happy to live with it!
Last edited by AsianGirl007; 02-18-03 at 10:22 AM.
#3
It's my understanding the RX330 on tour right now at various shows and dealerships are NOT prototypes but rather "pre-production" models made from production tooling. There should not any distinct design changes between these show models and the final full production ones in April. That "gap" LexusPia saw is NOT a "fit & finish" flaw but part of the design. I agree that gap seems big and see no reason why it can't be smaller. It is very visible with a light color vehicle.
Lexus also says the roof rack will be standard on the new RX. I for one will be more concern with that than the gap since roof racks especially the cross-bars tend to generate a lot of wind noise while crusing at highway speed. I don't understand why Lexus would want to include the roof racks as standard when hardly anyone ever use them and besides they are a pain because they get in the way when washing and waxing the roof and not to mention potential for leaks. They are better off offering that as a separate option for people who really need them instead of jacking up the base price to include them as standard equipment.
Lexus also says the roof rack will be standard on the new RX. I for one will be more concern with that than the gap since roof racks especially the cross-bars tend to generate a lot of wind noise while crusing at highway speed. I don't understand why Lexus would want to include the roof racks as standard when hardly anyone ever use them and besides they are a pain because they get in the way when washing and waxing the roof and not to mention potential for leaks. They are better off offering that as a separate option for people who really need them instead of jacking up the base price to include them as standard equipment.
#5
Lexus Diva
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 6,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We already had our preview of the RX330 and when I asked about the car, a Lexus factory rep used the word "prototype". If you ask me, I wouldn't know the difference between "prototype" and "pre-production"!! (haha) All I know is the car didn't look quite "finished". He also said that a roof rack will not be on the car with the "large moonroof" as it does not fit. I am going to an off-road test drive on March 12th. I'll be able to take a closer look at the car then.
Last edited by AsianGirl007; 02-19-03 at 06:10 PM.
#6
Lexus Champion
Originally posted by Longo Lexus
Please keep in mind that auto show cars are prototype vehicles and sometimes do not reflect "fit & finish" 100%
Please keep in mind that auto show cars are prototype vehicles and sometimes do not reflect "fit & finish" 100%
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The current RX has the same lower lip look too.
http://lexus.com/showroom/model/rx.html
Its not as prominent as the new RX330's because of the front bumper design and the cross bar that runs across the middle of the gap.
Currently, we stick our hands into that gap on the RX300 to pull the latch to open the hood. Maybe the designers left that gap there for the same purpose... to allow us to get to the latch for the hood??
Maybe there could have been a better design (like the bmw's who have a little inverted hook like latch that pops out of the kidney shaped grills).
http://lexus.com/showroom/model/rx.html
Its not as prominent as the new RX330's because of the front bumper design and the cross bar that runs across the middle of the gap.
Currently, we stick our hands into that gap on the RX300 to pull the latch to open the hood. Maybe the designers left that gap there for the same purpose... to allow us to get to the latch for the hood??
Maybe there could have been a better design (like the bmw's who have a little inverted hook like latch that pops out of the kidney shaped grills).
#10
Lexus Diva
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 6,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey! There's 2 little gaps instead of 1 big gap. I never did notice that...not even on my '99 RX300. Now I definately cannot wait to get a closer look at it. Yes, you would think the auto show model should be completed. And funny thing is, the Lexus rep said it WAS hand built. Weird, huh?
#11
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Daddy-O is right on with his picture arrow pointing to the exact "hole" or "gap" that I was referring to. [thanks Daddy-O].
Tell me guys, why would you need a large elongated "gap" or "opening" there for you to stick your fingers in when you have an inside hood release that pops the hood loose to begin with? Just seems to me it would look much better not to indent that top of the bumper and make it smooth like the rest of the bumper instead. On the current 300, the "opening" is much narrower and separated by the thin slat which makes it part of the grill. Even the Lexus rep there agreed that "finger opening" seemed excessive and probably not necessary.
YWW, thanks for pointing out about the luggage rack. I sure didn't know that was going to be standard. I for one have absolutely no use for one and besides my garage door opening may not be able to accommodate that extra height. My brother's mini-van with a roof rack can't clear my garage door opening and the only way he can get in is to lower the tire pressure on all 4 tires to about 12 pounds of air from the normal 32 psi. The rack is definitely out in my book and I guess we won't buy a new RX330 if the rack is indeed standard (yes, we'll put up with the large grill opening).
Tell me guys, why would you need a large elongated "gap" or "opening" there for you to stick your fingers in when you have an inside hood release that pops the hood loose to begin with? Just seems to me it would look much better not to indent that top of the bumper and make it smooth like the rest of the bumper instead. On the current 300, the "opening" is much narrower and separated by the thin slat which makes it part of the grill. Even the Lexus rep there agreed that "finger opening" seemed excessive and probably not necessary.
YWW, thanks for pointing out about the luggage rack. I sure didn't know that was going to be standard. I for one have absolutely no use for one and besides my garage door opening may not be able to accommodate that extra height. My brother's mini-van with a roof rack can't clear my garage door opening and the only way he can get in is to lower the tire pressure on all 4 tires to about 12 pounds of air from the normal 32 psi. The rack is definitely out in my book and I guess we won't buy a new RX330 if the rack is indeed standard (yes, we'll put up with the large grill opening).
#14
Originally posted by LexusPia
Tell me guys, why would you need a large elongated "gap" or "opening" there for you to stick your fingers in when you have an inside hood release that pops the hood loose to begin with? Just seems to me it would look much better not to indent that top of the bumper and make it smooth like the rest of the bumper instead. On the current 300, the "opening" is much narrower and separated by the thin slat which makes it part of the grill. Even the Lexus rep there agreed that "finger opening" seemed excessive and probably not necessary.
Tell me guys, why would you need a large elongated "gap" or "opening" there for you to stick your fingers in when you have an inside hood release that pops the hood loose to begin with? Just seems to me it would look much better not to indent that top of the bumper and make it smooth like the rest of the bumper instead. On the current 300, the "opening" is much narrower and separated by the thin slat which makes it part of the grill. Even the Lexus rep there agreed that "finger opening" seemed excessive and probably not necessary.
John
Last edited by j4ydubs; 02-22-03 at 07:58 AM.
#15
Pole Position
Thread Starter
John thanks for your photos. I have to say after looking at "with gap" and "with no gap", I prefer the one without the "gap" much better. The "with no gap" design seems to be more "sporty and rugged" looking and resemble the GS a little. Let's see what others have to say.