RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009) Discussion topics related to the 2004 -2009 RX330, RX350 and RX400H models

ML Stereo Quality?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-07, 10:10 PM
  #1  
woof
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
woof's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ML Stereo Quality?

Hello, we are brand new RX owners (about 8 hours). Our model has the Mark L stereo in it and I'm scratching my head as this does not sound any better than other stock stereos I have owned in my other vehicles (such as the system in my Chevy Avalanche). Does anyone have any insight as to why this is? Costing was about 4K for this option, I must be missing something. Thanks in advance for any help or words of advice....
Old 05-21-07, 09:49 AM
  #2  
salimshah
Moderator
 
salimshah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 15,260
Received 992 Likes on 897 Posts
Default

If you dig thorugh old posts, you will find a general consensus that the ML system in RX is not head and shoulder above the base. If I am not mistaken the 4k option buys you more than just the head-unit, amp and speakers.

How to further upgrade? Try visiting the Audio-video special interest group of CL.

Sound is so subjective ... some want deep bass and add bazookas etc and then there are purists. The aucoustics in the cab also play an important part.

I am on the other extreme where PNR reception is my criteria of audio system in a vehicle when I am alone, and conversing with the occupants when not.

Salim
Old 05-21-07, 12:03 PM
  #3  
AM1
Lexus Champion

iTrader: (6)
 
AM1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: So CaL
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i dont think its that much better. and compared to other lexus models like the IS,GS, LS it sucks *****.
Old 05-21-07, 05:40 PM
  #4  
tfischer
Moderator
 
tfischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,611
Received 189 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

You say sucking ***** like it's a bad thing.
Old 05-21-07, 07:24 PM
  #5  
mandyfig
Moderator
 
mandyfig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 12,298
Received 407 Likes on 359 Posts
Default

I would rather suck on..................a chocolate ice cream bar!
Old 05-22-07, 12:06 AM
  #6  
AM1
Lexus Champion

iTrader: (6)
 
AM1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: So CaL
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

well for the amount of $$$ they should have invested as much developmetn as they did for the other car models.
Old 05-22-07, 06:21 AM
  #7  
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 8,695
Received 68 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

The stock unit is worst than the ML.
Old 05-22-07, 06:51 AM
  #8  
jfelbab
Moderator
 
jfelbab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: FL
Posts: 3,283
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

The ML unit is really quite accurate. If you are parked in a quiet location it displays a full rich balanced sound, much better than the standard unit. BTW, the $4,000 was for an option package that included Nav as well as the ML and some other items.

That said in a moving vehicle the richness and balanced tonal quality is lost to road and wind noise. The RX, IMO, is not as quiet as any of the other Lexus models.
Old 05-22-07, 08:15 AM
  #9  
tfischer
Moderator
 
tfischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,611
Received 189 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

The ML in my RX350 sounds pretty good, but the ML in my SC sounds great. Those who are lucky enough to deserve a ride always comment on the excellent sound. I don't get that in the RX.

But the SC has a very small interior, and I would not think that the large interior space of the RX lends itself to hi fidelity. I have not heard a stock RX audio system, but the ML system does not impress me the way it does in the SC.

Finally, while we are on the subject, the ML system in the SC changes its equalization depending on whether the top is up or down, which is a nice touch.
Old 05-22-07, 08:54 AM
  #10  
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 8,695
Received 68 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

I dont think it is the large interior that cause the ML in RX to sound so good. I say this because the ML in the GX470 sounds great compare to the RX.
Old 05-22-07, 01:48 PM
  #11  
mandyfig
Moderator
 
mandyfig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 12,298
Received 407 Likes on 359 Posts
Default

The ASL feature is good on the OEM sound system. But still there leaves a lot to be desired on the OEM sound system.
Old 05-23-07, 06:18 AM
  #12  
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
 
The G Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 8,695
Received 68 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

I just leave the ASL off, I dont even use it.
Old 05-23-07, 10:16 PM
  #13  
pump142
Driver
 
pump142's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what does the ASL do?
Old 05-23-07, 10:41 PM
  #14  
AM1
Lexus Champion

iTrader: (6)
 
AM1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: So CaL
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

the asl button seems to mufle the music?
Old 05-24-07, 02:41 AM
  #15  
cheap_deal
Driver
 
cheap_deal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UAE
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the asl increases the sound depending on the road noise... right?
i havent seen any difference with it turned on or off, maybe the UAE RX350 is different??? i dont even get freakin voice commands for the navi!!!!!


Quick Reply: ML Stereo Quality?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:33 AM.