Pics of your RC NOW!
#31
#39
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: GA
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, because from that picture, you only see the headlight, so you really don't see how conflicting the design fits into the rest of the car. You also can't tell how the headlight is shaped towards the center and how that conflicts with the shape of the car.
I swear Lexus tries to make their cars look like people adapted headlights on a car they don't belong on. The LFA looks great, but its sibling was designed by someone on acid.
This angle is catastrophically ugly to me:
and this looks like the car is cross-eyed:
This is IMO, probably shared by many, but also many more would disagree.
Iv'e spent a lot of time trying to find a car design that has this much confusion in its lines and that has so much random busy body lines that are conflicting, disappearing, etc.. but I couldn't find anything. Lexus new lines (not only on this car) makes the Chris Bangle era BMWs look clean.
I swear Lexus tries to make their cars look like people adapted headlights on a car they don't belong on. The LFA looks great, but its sibling was designed by someone on acid.
This angle is catastrophically ugly to me:
and this looks like the car is cross-eyed:
This is IMO, probably shared by many, but also many more would disagree.
Iv'e spent a lot of time trying to find a car design that has this much confusion in its lines and that has so much random busy body lines that are conflicting, disappearing, etc.. but I couldn't find anything. Lexus new lines (not only on this car) makes the Chris Bangle era BMWs look clean.
Last edited by Zfrog; 04-06-15 at 11:24 AM.
#40
No, because from that picture, you only see the headlight, so you really don't see how conflicting the design fits into the rest of the car. You also can't tell how the headlight is shaped towards the center and how that conflicts with the shape of the car.
I swear Lexus tries to make their cars look like people adapted headlights on a car they don't belong on. The LFA looks great, but its sibling was designed by someone on acid.
This angle is catastrophically ugly to me:
and this looks like the car is cross-eyed:
This is IMO, probably shared by many, but also many more would disagree.
Iv'e spent a lot of time trying to find a car design that has this much confusion in its lines and that has so much random busy body lines that are conflicting, disappearing, etc.. but I couldn't find anything. Lexus new lines (not only on this car) makes the Chris Bangle era BMWs look clean.
I swear Lexus tries to make their cars look like people adapted headlights on a car they don't belong on. The LFA looks great, but its sibling was designed by someone on acid.
This angle is catastrophically ugly to me:
and this looks like the car is cross-eyed:
This is IMO, probably shared by many, but also many more would disagree.
Iv'e spent a lot of time trying to find a car design that has this much confusion in its lines and that has so much random busy body lines that are conflicting, disappearing, etc.. but I couldn't find anything. Lexus new lines (not only on this car) makes the Chris Bangle era BMWs look clean.
like the majority of people that have voiced an opinion of the RC, I am in the camp that sees it as a fantastic looking coupe.
Great shape. Great lines. Great appeal.... inside and out. I do not see it as crosseyed and to me the lights (front and rear) are money.
The following users liked this post:
Patarac (05-02-18)